Softwr

Proposals · pricing

Cone pricing

Cone publishes a single tier. Below is what it costs, what it covers, and how that compares with the proposals tools listed alongside it.

As of 31 August 2026, Cone pricing is on request. Figures are the vendor's list prices as recorded on this page's last check; the vendor's site is the final word.

Entry price
On request
Model
Quote
Tiers
1
Free tier
Not on record

Cone plans, side by side

Every published tier in ascending order of price, with the number of features each one lists. An absence here means the record does not itemise it, not that the tier lacks it.

Cone pricing tiers
PlanPriceFeatures listedStep up from the tier below
ConeOn request5Entry tier

What the product covers

The full Cone feature record, grouped as the catalogue groups it. This is the product as a whole; the record does not map every feature onto a specific tier.

Other

  • Engagement letters
  • Electronic signature
  • Recurring billing
  • Direct debit collection
  • Scope creep flagging
  • Service line templates
  • Client onboarding tasks

People bring Cone in for a bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreements, an accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasons, a practice losing revenue to out of scope work that is never billed because nobody notices it, standardising pricing across a firm so that partners stop quoting the same service at different rates. If that is not the job you are buying for, the alternatives to Cone are worth a look before you commit to a tier.

How that compares in Proposals

Too few proposals tools in this directory publish a starting price to quote a meaningful median, so the table below is a like-for-like list rather than a ranking.

Cone entry price against other Proposals tools
ToolEntry priceModelRatedHead to head
Cone (this page)On requestquote-
Quoter$299/monthPer month by published quote volume-vs Cone
Nusii$29/monthPer month by active proposal count-vs Cone
SubskribeOn requestquote-vs Cone
ProsperoOn requestquote-vs Cone
MoxieOn requestquote-vs Cone
PaperbellOn requestquote-vs Cone

Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry, they are not reviews hosted on Softwr. How each figure is used is set out on the Cone badges page.

Before you pay for Cone

Three things this page cannot tell you, and all three change the bill. The record carries a price and a billing period but not the unit - per-seat and flat-rate pricing are indistinguishable in this data, so a five-person team may be looking at five times the figure above. It carries no annual rate, so any discount for paying yearly is not something this page can quote. And it carries no trial length.

What it can tell you is the shape of the ladder: a single tier at On request. With no free tier on record, the cheapest way to answer the rest is to compare Cone against the tools that do have one before committing.

Cone runs on web, and is published by Cone of Remote, Worldwide. The full record is on the Cone review, and the rest of the category is under best proposals tools.

Cone pricing on the vendor's own site

Cone pricing questions

How much does Cone cost?
Cone publishes a single tier, Cone, at On request.
Does Cone have a free plan?
Not on the record we hold: Cone is listed as quote. Whether a free trial is offered is not something this record captures, so check the vendor's site.
Which proposals tools can I use without paying?
1 of the 8 proposals tools listed alongside Cone have a free tier: Indy.
What am I actually paying for with Cone?
The record lists 7 features across 1 area: other. In practice it is brought in for a bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreements, an accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasons, a practice losing revenue to out of scope work that is never billed because nobody notices it.
Does Cone charge per user?
The record carries a price and a billing period for each of its 1 tiers, but not the unit that price is charged in. Per-seat and flat-rate billing look identical in this data, so check the vendor's page before budgeting for a team.
Are these Cone prices current?
They are what the catalogue entry holds, refreshed when the entry is. Vendors change pricing without notice and nobody at Softwr re-verifies each tier by hand, so treat this as a structured summary and the vendor's own pricing page as the authority.
What should I compare Cone against before paying?
The closest proposals tools in this directory are Quoter, Nusii, Subskribe, Prospero. Each has a side-by-side comparison with Cone covering price, platforms and features.

Related pages