Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

Manatal vs ZipRecruiter

Manatal logo

Manatal

Recruitment

Low-cost applicant tracking and recruitment CRM with candidate enrichment, sold to both in-house teams and agencies

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
ZipRecruiter logo

ZipRecruiter

Recruitment

Job posting and applicant matching platform priced per job slot, quoted individually per employer

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Manatal pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.; ZipRecruiter no rate card is published anywhere, so an employer has no way to benchmark whether its quote is competitive without seeking independent estimates or comparing notes with peers.
  • They diverge on capability: Manatal covers Candidate enrichment, ZipRecruiter covers Multi-board distribution.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Manatal and ZipRecruiter actually diverge.

Attributes where Manatal and ZipRecruiter differ
AttributeManatalZipRecruiter
Pricing modelPer user per monthPer active job slot per month, quoted individually
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Manatal

  • Candidate enrichment
  • AI candidate scoring
  • Recruitment CRM
  • Multi-board posting
  • CV parsing
  • Careers page builder
  • Custom pipelines
  • Reporting

Only in ZipRecruiter

  • Multi-board distribution
  • AI candidate matching
  • Resume database access
  • Applicant tracking basics
  • Mobile employer app
  • Sponsored job boosting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Manatal

  • A small recruitment agency that needs client, candidate and placement tracking without an enterprise contractnot ZipRecruiter
  • An in-house team in Asia Pacific that wants candidate enrichment without paying enterprise ATS pricesnot ZipRecruiter
  • A company processing high applicant volume that needs automated ranking to triage a shortlistnot ZipRecruiter
  • A recruiter running both contingent search and internal hiring from one databasenot ZipRecruiter

ZipRecruiter

  • A small or mid-sized employer with a handful of concurrent open roles wanting broad job board distribution from one postingnot Manatal
  • A hiring manager without a full ATS wanting basic pipeline and messaging tools alongside job distributionnot Manatal
  • A company that wants to proactively search a resume database rather than only waiting for applicantsnot Manatal
  • An employer comparing per-slot job board spend against a flat-fee ATS subscription for a similar hiring volumenot Manatal

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Manatal

  • Pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.
  • Candidate enrichment depends on public profile data, so accuracy drops sharply in markets where professional networking sites have low penetration and the scores become misleading rather than useful.
  • Integrations with major HRIS and payroll systems are limited compared with Western competitors, so new hire handover is frequently a CSV export rather than a sync.
  • Support operates on Indochina business hours, which leaves European afternoons and all of North American working hours outside the responsive window.
  • Reporting covers recruiter activity and source data but lacks the cohort and quality-of-hire analysis a mature talent function expects, and custom analysis means exporting to a spreadsheet.

ZipRecruiter

  • No rate card is published anywhere, so an employer has no way to benchmark whether its quote is competitive without seeking independent estimates or comparing notes with peers.
  • Cost is charged per active job slot, so an employer with several concurrent openings pays multiplicatively, and pausing then reopening roles can reset pricing negotiations.
  • It is not a full applicant tracking system, so companies with more than lightweight pipeline needs typically still run a separate ATS alongside it, adding integration overhead.
  • Quotes reportedly vary significantly by industry competitiveness and geography, so cost predictability across a multi-location or multi-department hiring plan is poor.
  • Candidate quality and match relevance depend heavily on how well the AI matching interprets a job description, and poorly written postings can under-perform without an obvious signal why.

Pricing, plan by plan

Manatal

On request
  • Professional$undefined/month
    • Per recruiter seat
    • Unlimited jobs and candidates
    • Candidate enrichment and AI scoring
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Per recruiter seat at a higher rate
    • Custom fields and advanced permissions
    • Recruitment CRM for agency use
  • Custom$undefined/year
    • Negotiated terms for larger teams
    • Single sign-on and security review
    • Dedicated account management

ZipRecruiter

On request
  • Standard$undefined/month
    • Priced per active job slot, quoted by industry, location and company size
    • Job distribution across the ZipRecruiter network
    • Basic applicant tracking and messaging
  • Premium$undefined/month
    • Priced per active job slot, quoted individually
    • Expanded resume database access and search
    • Enhanced candidate reach and visibility
  • Pro$undefined/month
    • Priced per active job slot, quoted individually
    • Highest visibility and matching priority
    • Dedicated account support

Which should you pick?

Choose Manatal if

  • You need candidate enrichment.
  • You also want ai candidate scoring.
Manatal review

Choose ZipRecruiter if

  • You need multi-board distribution.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want ai candidate matching.
ZipRecruiter review

Questions people ask

Is Manatal or ZipRecruiter better?
Neither clearly leads. Manatal starts at On request and ZipRecruiter at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Manatal or ZipRecruiter?
Manatal starts at On request and ZipRecruiter at On request.
Does Manatal or ZipRecruiter run on more platforms?
Manatal runs on Web. ZipRecruiter runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Manatal best used for?
Manatal is most often used for a small recruitment agency that needs client, candidate and placement tracking without an enterprise contract, an in-house team in asia pacific that wants candidate enrichment without paying enterprise ats prices, a company processing high applicant volume that needs automated ranking to triage a shortlist, a recruiter running both contingent search and internal hiring from one database. Of those, a small recruitment agency that needs client, candidate and placement tracking without an enterprise contract and an in-house team in asia pacific that wants candidate enrichment without paying enterprise ats prices are not what ZipRecruiter is typically brought in for.
What can Manatal do that ZipRecruiter cannot?
Manatal covers Candidate enrichment, AI candidate scoring, Recruitment CRM, Multi-board posting. ZipRecruiter covers Multi-board distribution, AI candidate matching, Resume database access, Applicant tracking basics.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Manatal: Is it for agencies or in-house teams?

Both. The agency mode adds client and placement management; the corporate mode is a conventional ATS. Buying the wrong mode means paying for modules you never open.

ZipRecruiter: How much does ZipRecruiter cost?

It is not published. Pricing is a monthly subscription per active job slot, quoted individually by industry, location, company size and hiring volume.

Manatal: How is it priced compared with other ATS products?

Per recruiter seat per month. That is not comparable with vendors that charge per active job slot or per employee, so model your real user count before comparing headline numbers.

ZipRecruiter: Is ZipRecruiter a full ATS replacement?

No. It includes basic pipeline and messaging tools but most employers with real ATS needs run a separate system alongside it.

Manatal: Where is candidate data hosted?

On cloud infrastructure with GDPR commitments, but region-specific residency guarantees are weaker than EU-native vendors offer, which matters for regulated European buyers.

ZipRecruiter: Can I post one job without a subscription?

Historically ZipRecruiter has offered pay-per-job or trial options in some markets, but its main employer product is a recurring per-slot subscription.

Manatal: Does the AI scoring actually work?

It ranks reliably against structured requirements such as skills and experience length. It is far less reliable where enrichment data is sparse.

Share

Related pages

More on Manatal

More on ZipRecruiter

Keep looking

Other head to heads