Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs PlanetScale

Cody
Developer Tools
AI coding assistant powered by code search
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

PlanetScale
Databases
The MySQL-compatible serverless database
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- PlanetScale is a MySQL-compatible serverless database platform.
- Cody is free; PlanetScale starts at $15/mo.
- Where Cody falls short: sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page.
- Where PlanetScale falls short: pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and PlanetScale actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cody | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Usage-based |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that PlanetScale does not also cover.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot PlanetScale
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot PlanetScale
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot PlanetScale
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot PlanetScale
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot Cody
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot Cody
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot Cody
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/mo
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/mo
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or PlanetScale better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or PlanetScale?
- Cody starts at Free and PlanetScale at Free.
- Does Cody or PlanetScale run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what PlanetScale is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that PlanetScale cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourcePlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceRelated pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Warp
- Cody vs CodeSandbox
- Cody vs GitLab
- Cody vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cody vs Eclipse
- Cody vs Garden
- Cody vs HCP Terraform
- Cody vs Helm
- Cody vs Jenkins
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs GitLab CI/CD
- Cody vs Amazon Aurora
- Cody vs Nile
- Cody vs Cockroach Labs
- Cody vs PostgreSQL
- Cody vs BigQuery
- Cody vs MotherDuck
- Cody vs FaunaDB
- Cody vs DataGrip
- Cody vs TiDB
- Cody vs Readyset
- Cody vs Xata
- Cody vs Chroma
- Cody vs Cloudinary
- Cody vs Convex
- Cody vs Dgraph
- Cody vs Dragonfly
- Cody vs Dremio
- Cody vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs Sourcegraph
- PlanetScale vs Sweep
- PlanetScale vs Deep Code
- PlanetScale vs GitHub Copilot
- PlanetScale vs Bazel
- PlanetScale vs Fig
- PlanetScale vs GoLand
- PlanetScale vs Warp
- PlanetScale vs CodeSandbox
- PlanetScale vs GitLab
- PlanetScale vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- PlanetScale vs Eclipse
- PlanetScale vs Garden
- PlanetScale vs HCP Terraform
- PlanetScale vs Helm
- PlanetScale vs Jenkins
- PlanetScale vs PhpStorm
- PlanetScale vs GitLab CI/CD
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs Xata
- PlanetScale vs Chroma
- PlanetScale vs Cloudinary
- PlanetScale vs Convex
- PlanetScale vs Dgraph
- PlanetScale vs Dragonfly
- PlanetScale vs Dremio
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
