Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Garden
Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Garden incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Garden actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Garden does not also cover.
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Garden
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Garden
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Garden
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Garden
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Cody
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Cody
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Cody
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely.
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost.
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police.
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tier$undefined/year
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Which should you pick?
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- You also want shared result caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Garden better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Garden at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Garden?
- Cody starts at Free and Garden at Free.
- Does Cody or Garden run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Garden is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Garden cannot?
- Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceGarden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Cody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceGarden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Cody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceGarden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Garden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Warp
- Cody vs Claude Code
- Cody vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Cody vs ConfigCat
- Cody vs Cortex
- Cody vs Dagger
- Cody vs Deno
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Okteto
- Cody vs Depot
- Cody vs Earthly
- Cody vs Ansible
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Nix
- Cody vs Blacksmith
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs Namespace
- Cody vs OpsLevel
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Vite
- Cody vs Daytona
- Cody vs Eclipse IDE
- Garden vs Turborepo
- Garden vs Visual Studio Code
- Garden vs ESLint
- Garden vs pnpm
- Garden vs Sourcegraph
- Garden vs Sweep
- Garden vs GitHub Copilot
- Garden vs Bazel
- Garden vs Fig
- Garden vs GoLand
- Garden vs Warp
- Garden vs Claude Code
- Garden vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Garden vs ConfigCat
- Garden vs Cortex
- Garden vs Dagger
- Garden vs Deno
- Garden vs PhpStorm
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Tilt
- Garden vs Namespace
- Garden vs OpsLevel
- Garden vs Webpack
- Garden vs Vite
- Garden vs Daytona
- Garden vs Eclipse IDE