Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Dragonfly

Cody
Developer Tools
AI coding assistant powered by code search
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Dragonfly
Databases
High-performance Redis-compatible in-memory datastore with 25x better throughput
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Dragonfly is a modern in-memory data store.
- Cody is free; Dragonfly starts at $2000/mo.
- Where Cody falls short: sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page.
- Where Dragonfly falls short: flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Dragonfly actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Dragonfly.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Dragonfly does not also cover.
Only in Dragonfly
- Redis API compatibility
- Thread-per-core architecture
- High-performance caching
- Memory efficiency
- Real-time leaderboards
- Message queue support
- ML feature serving
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Dragonfly
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Dragonfly
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Dragonfly
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Dragonfly
Dragonfly
- High-throughput caching for web applicationsnot Cody
- Real-time leaderboards and rankingsnot Cody
- Message queue and event processingnot Cody
- ML model feature serving at millisecond latenciesnot Cody
- Gaming session state and player data storagenot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Dragonfly
- Flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring
- Business tier $2,000/month represents significant jump in cost
- Limited to in-memory storage, not suitable for cold data or archival
- Bring-your-own-cloud requirement on Business tier adds operational complexity
- Cloud availability dependent on AWS/GCP/Azure uptime
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Dragonfly
Free- Free TierFree
- 100 cloud credits for new signups
- Equivalent to free trial
- Business$2,000/mo
- Starting price for enterprise offering
- Bring-your-own-cloud deployment
- Auto-scaling with custom SLAs
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom pricing
- Any-cloud deployment
- Custom instances and sizing
Which should you pick?
Choose Dragonfly if
- You need redis api compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want thread-per-core architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Dragonfly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Dragonfly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Dragonfly?
- Cody starts at Free and Dragonfly at Free.
- Does Cody or Dragonfly run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Dragonfly runs on Web, AWS, GCP, Azure.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Dragonfly is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Dragonfly cannot?
- Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Thread-per-core architecture, High-performance caching, Memory efficiency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceDragonfly: How much faster is Dragonfly than Redis?
Dragonfly achieves 3.97M queries per second compared to Redis's 718K QPS, representing a 25x improvement. Memory efficiency is also 30% better.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceDragonfly: Can I migrate from Redis to Dragonfly without code changes?
Yes. Dragonfly maintains full API compatibility with Redis and Memcached, allowing drop-in replacement with minimal to no code modifications.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Warp
- Cody vs CodeSandbox
- Cody vs GitLab
- Cody vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cody vs Eclipse
- Cody vs Garden
- Cody vs HCP Terraform
- Cody vs Helm
- Cody vs Jenkins
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs GitLab CI/CD
- Cody vs Redis
- Cody vs Valkey
- Cody vs Memcached
- Cody vs Readyset
- Cody vs SingleStore
- Cody vs Apache Druid
- Cody vs TiDB
- Cody vs ScyllaDB
- Cody vs Firebolt
- Cody vs QuestDB
- Cody vs Amazon Aurora
- Cody vs Couchbase
- Cody vs Apache Hadoop
- Cody vs Apache Spark
- Cody vs ArangoDB
- Cody vs Canary Labs
- Cody vs Chroma
- Cody vs Apache Solr
- Dragonfly vs Sourcegraph
- Dragonfly vs Sweep
- Dragonfly vs Deep Code
- Dragonfly vs GitHub Copilot
- Dragonfly vs Bazel
- Dragonfly vs Fig
- Dragonfly vs GoLand
- Dragonfly vs Warp
- Dragonfly vs CodeSandbox
- Dragonfly vs GitLab
- Dragonfly vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Dragonfly vs Eclipse
- Dragonfly vs Garden
- Dragonfly vs HCP Terraform
- Dragonfly vs Helm
- Dragonfly vs Jenkins
- Dragonfly vs PhpStorm
- Dragonfly vs GitLab CI/CD
- Dragonfly vs Redis
- Dragonfly vs Valkey
- Dragonfly vs Memcached
- Dragonfly vs Readyset
- Dragonfly vs SingleStore
- Dragonfly vs Apache Druid
- Dragonfly vs TiDB
- Dragonfly vs ScyllaDB
- Dragonfly vs Firebolt
- Dragonfly vs QuestDB
- Dragonfly vs Amazon Aurora
- Dragonfly vs Couchbase
- Dragonfly vs Apache Hadoop
- Dragonfly vs Apache Spark
- Dragonfly vs ArangoDB
- Dragonfly vs Canary Labs
- Dragonfly vs Chroma
- Dragonfly vs Apache Solr
