Cloud · head to head
Neon vs QuestDB

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neon compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neon and QuestDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neon
- Serverless PostgreSQL
- Database Branching
- Autoscaling
- Bottomless Storage
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Connection Pooling
- Read Replicas
- Instant Cloning
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neon
- Serverless applicationsnot QuestDB
- Development databasesnot QuestDB
- Preview environmentsnot QuestDB
- Testingnot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot Neon
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot Neon
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not Neon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neon
- Compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Separation of compute and storage may add complexity to cost prediction compared to all-in-one plans
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Neon
Free- FreeFree
- 100 CU-hours/month
- 0.5 GB storage
- 1 project
- Launch$15/month
- Pay-as-you-go compute
- $0.35/GB storage
- Multiple projects
- Scale$31/month
- Higher compute rates
- 99.95% SLA
- HIPAA compliance
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Neon if
- You need serverless postgresql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want database branching.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Neon or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neon starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neon or QuestDB?
- Neon starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does Neon or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- Neon runs on Cloud. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use Neon for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neon best used for?
- Neon is most often used for serverless applications, development databases, preview environments, testing. Of those, serverless applications and development databases are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Neon do that QuestDB cannot?
- Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Database Branching, Autoscaling, Bottomless Storage. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neon: What is Neon and what makes it different?
Neon is a serverless PostgreSQL database that separates compute and storage, enabling automatic scaling and instant database branching. After acquisition by Databricks in May 2025, pricing has been significantly reduced.
SourceQuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceNeon: Does Neon offer a free tier?
Yes, Neon's free tier includes 100 compute units per month and 0.5 GB of storage. This is suitable for development and small projects.
SourceQuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceNeon: What are the paid plans and pricing for Neon?
Neon offers consumption-based pricing on Launch ($0.106/CU-hour, approximately $15/month) and Scale ($0.222/CU-hour, approximately $31/month) plans with separate storage billing at $0.35/GB-month. No monthly minimum required.
SourceQuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceNeon: What features does Neon provide?
Neon includes git-like branching for database copies, point-in-time recovery, data anonymization for testing, managed authentication, serverless functions, and object storage that branches with projects.
SourceNeon: What compliance and reliability guarantees does Neon provide?
Neon's Scale tier offers 99.95% uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, SOC2 certification, and private networking via PrivateLink at no extra cost.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Neon vs Upstash
- Neon vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Neon vs DigitalOcean
- Neon vs Render
- Neon vs Oracle Cloud
- Neon vs Fly.io
- Neon vs Railway
- Neon vs Scaleway
- Neon vs Proxmox VE
- Neon vs Vultr
- Neon vs Tencent Cloud
- Neon vs Lambda
- Neon vs Linode
- Neon vs Longhorn
- Neon vs Northflank
- Neon vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Neon vs minikube
- Neon vs OpenTelemetry
- Neon vs TimescaleDB
- Neon vs PostgreSQL
- Neon vs Cockroach Labs
- Neon vs Amazon Aurora
- Neon vs Airtable
- Neon vs Firebolt
- Neon vs Apache Flink
- Neon vs DuckDB
- Neon vs OpenSearch
- Neon vs ClickHouse
- Neon vs NATS
- Neon vs Canary Labs
- Neon vs Chroma
- Neon vs Cloudinary
- Neon vs Convex
- Neon vs Dgraph
- Neon vs Dragonfly
- Neon vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Upstash
- QuestDB vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- QuestDB vs DigitalOcean
- QuestDB vs Render
- QuestDB vs Oracle Cloud
- QuestDB vs Fly.io
- QuestDB vs Railway
- QuestDB vs Scaleway
- QuestDB vs Proxmox VE
- QuestDB vs Vultr
- QuestDB vs Tencent Cloud
- QuestDB vs Lambda
- QuestDB vs Linode
- QuestDB vs Longhorn
- QuestDB vs Northflank
- QuestDB vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- QuestDB vs minikube
- QuestDB vs OpenTelemetry
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid

