Backup · head to head
CloudCasa vs Portworx

CloudCasa
Backup
SaaS Kubernetes backup and migration with published per-node pricing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Portworx
Cloud
Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
- From
- $0.33/node hour
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CloudCasa has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CloudCasa at $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.; Portworx bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- They diverge on capability: CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Portworx covers Container-native volumes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudCasa and Portworx actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudCasa
- SaaS control plane
- Free tier
- Cross-cluster restore
- Managed service support
- Bring your own storage
- Velero compatibility
Only in Portworx
- Container-native volumes
- Failure domain placement
- Volume encryption
- Database automation
- Disaster recovery
- Autopilot capacity management
- Hardware independence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudCasa
- A team wanting Kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup servernot Portworx
- A small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence costnot Portworx
- An organisation running Velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the topnot Portworx
- Migrating workloads between EKS and AKS where the tool must restore into a different distributionnot Portworx
Portworx
- Running a production PostgreSQL or Cassandra cluster on Kubernetes and needing the data to survive node lossnot CloudCasa
- A platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal Kubernetes platformnot CloudCasa
- Failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery positionnot CloudCasa
- An OpenShift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful setsnot CloudCasa
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudCasa
- At $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.
- The control plane is SaaS, so cluster metadata and backup catalogues sit with the vendor, which rules it out where policy prohibits external services holding infrastructure detail.
- Per-node pricing punishes clusters built from many small nodes, so the licensing metric can push architecture decisions in directions the platform team would not otherwise choose.
- The free tier stops at five nodes with no intermediate step, so growth from five to six nodes moves you from nothing to a full commercial rate.
- Catalogic is a much smaller vendor than Veeam or Commvault, which matters for procurement risk assessments and for long-term support commitments on a system you may depend on for years.
Portworx
- Bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- A 1,000 node hour monthly minimum applies, which means small or intermittent clusters pay for capacity they do not consume.
- Replicating volumes across nodes consumes real capacity and network bandwidth, so the underlying infrastructure cost rises alongside the licence in a way the node hour rate does not show.
- Pure Storage ownership means roadmap priorities are set by an array vendor, and buyers should confirm that hardware independence remains contractual rather than assumed.
- Operating it well requires Kubernetes storage expertise, and teams that adopted Kubernetes to simplify operations often find they have added a distributed storage system to run.
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudCasa
Free- BasicFree
- Up to 5 nodes at no cost
- Daily backup schedules for clusters and namespaces
- Basic and advanced restore options
- CloudCasa Pro$69/month
- Per node per month
- Advanced backup policies
- Application-aware backups
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Volume pricing negotiated
- Dedicated support and SLAs
- Custom retention and residency arrangements
Portworx
$0.33/node hour- Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes$0.33/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Replicated persistent volumes
- Encryption and disaster recovery
- Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes$1.11/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Same capabilities on bare metal clusters
- Higher rate reflects node density
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudCasa if
- You need saas control plane.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want free tier.
Choose Portworx if
- You need container-native volumes.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want failure domain placement.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudCasa or Portworx better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudCasa starts at Free and Portworx at $0.33/node hour, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudCasa or Portworx?
- CloudCasa has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CloudCasa and $0.33/node hour for Portworx.
- Does CloudCasa or Portworx run on more platforms?
- CloudCasa runs on Kubernetes, Web. Portworx runs on Linux.
- Can I use CloudCasa for free?
- Yes. CloudCasa has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour.
- What is CloudCasa best used for?
- CloudCasa is most often used for a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server, a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost, an organisation running velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the top, migrating workloads between eks and aks where the tool must restore into a different distribution. Of those, a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server and a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost are not what Portworx is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudCasa do that Portworx cannot?
- CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Free tier, Cross-cluster restore, Managed service support. Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Failure domain placement, Volume encryption, Database automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CloudCasa: What does it cost?
Free for up to five nodes. CloudCasa Pro is $69 per node per month. Enterprise arrangements are negotiated.
Portworx: Is Portworx tied to Pure Storage hardware?
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
CloudCasa: Where does the backup data go?
Typically to your own S3-compatible bucket. The vendor hosts the control plane and catalogue, not necessarily your data.
Portworx: What does a real cluster cost?
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
CloudCasa: Does it work with Velero?
Yes. It can manage existing Velero installations, which makes it a lower-friction upgrade than a rip and replace.
Portworx: Is backup included?
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CloudCasa vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- CloudCasa vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- CloudCasa vs HYCU
- CloudCasa vs Trilio
- CloudCasa vs Portworx Backup
- CloudCasa vs Velero
- CloudCasa vs BDRShield
- CloudCasa vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- CloudCasa vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- CloudCasa vs Redstor
- CloudCasa vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- CloudCasa vs Spanning Backup
- CloudCasa vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- CloudCasa vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- CloudCasa vs IBM Storage Protect
- CloudCasa vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- CloudCasa vs Macrium Reflect
- CloudCasa vs OpenEBS
- CloudCasa vs Rancher
- CloudCasa vs Longhorn
- CloudCasa vs Podman
- CloudCasa vs Scaleway
- CloudCasa vs DigitalOcean
- CloudCasa vs Packer
- CloudCasa vs Crossplane
- CloudCasa vs Dokku
- CloudCasa vs Encore
- CloudCasa vs Fastly
- CloudCasa vs Google Cloud Platform
- CloudCasa vs K3s
- CloudCasa vs Flux
- CloudCasa vs Vagrant
- CloudCasa vs Kustomize
- CloudCasa vs minikube
- Portworx vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Portworx vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Portworx vs HYCU
- Portworx vs Trilio
- Portworx vs Portworx Backup
- Portworx vs Velero
- Portworx vs BDRShield
- Portworx vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Portworx vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Portworx vs Redstor
- Portworx vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Portworx vs Spanning Backup
- Portworx vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Portworx vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Portworx vs IBM Storage Protect
- Portworx vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Portworx vs Macrium Reflect
- Portworx vs OpenEBS
- Portworx vs Rancher
- Portworx vs Longhorn
- Portworx vs Podman
- Portworx vs Scaleway
- Portworx vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx vs Packer
- Portworx vs Crossplane
- Portworx vs Dokku
- Portworx vs Encore
- Portworx vs Fastly
- Portworx vs Google Cloud Platform
- Portworx vs K3s
- Portworx vs Flux
- Portworx vs Vagrant
- Portworx vs Kustomize
- Portworx vs minikube
