Portworxvs
Ceph


Ceph: Ceph with Rook for open source Kubernetes storage without a per node hour charge

Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
As of 1 September 2026, Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour. Container-native storage for Kubernetes, owned by Pure Storage since 2020 and now sold with published consumption pricing at 0. Softwr lists it under Cloud. Portworx is made by Portworx by Pure Storage, available on Linux.
Overview
Portworx provides persistent storage, high availability, encryption and data services for stateful workloads on Kubernetes. It aggregates the disks attached to cluster nodes into a virtual storage pool, then provisions replicated volumes with placement rules that keep replicas away from the node running the pod, so a node failure does not take the data with it. It supports database automation, disaster recovery between clusters and volume-level encryption. The distinguishing capability is Kubernetes-awareness rather than raw storage performance. Portworx understands pods, namespaces and stateful sets, so it can place replicas by failure domain, rebalance when a node joins, and give a database operator storage that follows the workload. Container Storage Interface drivers from traditional array vendors expose a volume; Portworx participates in scheduling decisions. For teams running production databases on Kubernetes rather than in managed cloud services, that difference determines whether the platform survives a node loss. Pure Storage acquired Portworx in 2020 and it is sold as part of the Pure portfolio while remaining hardware-independent. The trade-off is cost structure. Consumption pricing is transparent, but at 0.33 dollars per virtual node hour a 20 node cluster running continuously is roughly 4,800 dollars a month, and bare metal at 1.11 dollars per node hour is over three times that. Storage that was previously an included cluster capability becomes a visible recurring line.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Portworx.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Ceph: Ceph with Rook for open source Kubernetes storage without a per node hour charge


Rancher: Rancher where the requirement is cluster management rather than storage, with Longhorn as its storage option


Portworx Backup: Portworx Backup for protecting Kubernetes applications rather than providing their persistent storage
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes
$0.33 /node hour
Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes
$1.11 /node hour
Capabilities
Container-native volumes
Replicated persistent volumes provisioned by Kubernetes storage classes
Failure domain placement
Replicas placed across nodes, racks and availability zones
Volume encryption
Per-volume encryption with external key management support
Database automation
Operators for running and scaling databases on Kubernetes
Disaster recovery
Synchronous and asynchronous replication between clusters
Autopilot capacity management
Automatic volume and pool expansion as usage grows
Hardware independence
Runs on any Kubernetes distribution and any underlying storage
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Keep looking
Open source distributed block storage for Kubernetes, incubating at the CNCF
Single-server platform that accepts a git push and runs Heroku buildpacks on Docker
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Portworx, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Open source distributed block storage for Kubernetes, incubating at the CNCF
Open source, no licence feeDeployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
quoteCloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
Free open source tool, then per month by run volumeFree self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates
Open source, no licence feeOpen source self-hosted platform that deploys applications and databases to servers you already own
Open source, no licence fee