Cloud · head to head
Portworx vs Trilio

Portworx
Cloud
Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
- From
- $0.33/node hour
- Rated
- -

Trilio
Backup
Backup and recovery for OpenStack, Kubernetes and Red Hat Virtualization
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Trilio has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Portworx bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.; Trilio coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- They diverge on capability: Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Trilio covers OpenStack backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Portworx and Trilio actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Portworx
- Container-native volumes
- Failure domain placement
- Volume encryption
- Database automation
- Disaster recovery
- Autopilot capacity management
- Hardware independence
Only in Trilio
- OpenStack backup
- Kubernetes backup
- OpenShift Virtualization
- Open format backups
- Incremental forever
- Self-service restore
- Free basic edition
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Portworx
- Running a production PostgreSQL or Cassandra cluster on Kubernetes and needing the data to survive node lossnot Trilio
- A platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal Kubernetes platformnot Trilio
- Failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery positionnot Trilio
- An OpenShift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful setsnot Trilio
Trilio
- A telco running an OpenStack cloud whose incumbent backup vendor supports it only through generic agentsnot Portworx
- An organisation migrating virtual machines from VMware to OpenShift Virtualization and needing protection on the new platform from day onenot Portworx
- A research institution protecting tenant workloads where each tenant should restore its own data without a ticketnot Portworx
- A platform team wanting to evaluate Kubernetes backup properly on ten nodes before committing budgetnot Portworx
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Portworx
- Bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- A 1,000 node hour monthly minimum applies, which means small or intermittent clusters pay for capacity they do not consume.
- Replicating volumes across nodes consumes real capacity and network bandwidth, so the underlying infrastructure cost rises alongside the licence in a way the node hour rate does not show.
- Pure Storage ownership means roadmap priorities are set by an array vendor, and buyers should confirm that hardware independence remains contractual rather than assumed.
- Operating it well requires Kubernetes storage expertise, and teams that adopted Kubernetes to simplify operations often find they have added a distributed storage system to run.
Trilio
- Coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- Trilio is a small vendor next to the backup incumbents, and buyers with ten year retention obligations should assess the risk of the company being acquired or wound down.
- Enterprise pricing is per node or per virtual machine and is not published, which makes it hard to compare against per-terabyte competitors without going through sales.
- The free basic edition stops at ten nodes with community support only, so the step from evaluation to production is a full commercial negotiation rather than a tier upgrade.
- Restore performance depends on the object storage or NFS target you supply, and egress charges from a cloud object store during a large recovery sit outside the vendor quote entirely.
Pricing, plan by plan
Portworx
$0.33/node hour- Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes$0.33/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Replicated persistent volumes
- Encryption and disaster recovery
- Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes$1.11/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Same capabilities on bare metal clusters
- Higher rate reflects node density
Trilio
Free- Basic EditionFree
- Up to ten nodes
- No time limit
- Community support only
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/year
- Priced per node or per virtual machine annually
- No scale limits
- OpenStack, Kubernetes, OpenShift and Red Hat Virtualization
Which should you pick?
Choose Portworx if
- You need container-native volumes.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want failure domain placement.
Choose Trilio if
- You need openstack backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want kubernetes backup.
Questions people ask
- Is Portworx or Trilio better?
- Neither clearly leads. Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour and Trilio at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Portworx or Trilio?
- Trilio has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.33/node hour for Portworx and Free for Trilio.
- Does Portworx or Trilio run on more platforms?
- Portworx runs on Linux. Trilio runs on Linux, Web.
- Can I use Trilio for free?
- Yes. Trilio has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour.
- What is Portworx best used for?
- Portworx is most often used for running a production postgresql or cassandra cluster on kubernetes and needing the data to survive node loss, a platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal kubernetes platform, failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery position, an openshift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful sets. Of those, running a production postgresql or cassandra cluster on kubernetes and needing the data to survive node loss and a platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal kubernetes platform are not what Trilio is typically brought in for.
- What can Portworx do that Trilio cannot?
- Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Failure domain placement, Volume encryption, Database automation. Trilio covers OpenStack backup, Kubernetes backup, OpenShift Virtualization, Open format backups.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Portworx: Is Portworx tied to Pure Storage hardware?
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
Trilio: Is the free edition production usable?
It is functionally complete up to ten nodes with community support only. Use it to evaluate, but understand that production incidents have no vendor behind them at that tier.
Portworx: What does a real cluster cost?
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
Trilio: Does it support OpenShift Virtualization?
Yes, which is the main reason it appears on shortlists for organisations moving virtual machines off VMware.
Portworx: Is backup included?
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Trilio: Where are backups stored?
On NFS or S3-compatible object storage you provide, in an open format rather than a proprietary vendor container.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Portworx vs OpenEBS
- Portworx vs Rancher
- Portworx vs Longhorn
- Portworx vs Podman
- Portworx vs Scaleway
- Portworx vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx vs Packer
- Portworx vs Crossplane
- Portworx vs Dokku
- Portworx vs Encore
- Portworx vs Fastly
- Portworx vs Google Cloud Platform
- Portworx vs K3s
- Portworx vs Flux
- Portworx vs Vagrant
- Portworx vs Kustomize
- Portworx vs minikube
- Portworx vs Velero
- Portworx vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Portworx vs Portworx Backup
- Portworx vs HYCU
- Portworx vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Portworx vs BDRShield
- Portworx vs CloudCasa
- Portworx vs Kopia
- Portworx vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Portworx vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Portworx vs Redstor
- Portworx vs rustic
- Portworx vs HPE StoreOnce
- Portworx vs MSP360 Backup
- Portworx vs N-able Backup
- Portworx vs OwnBackup
- Trilio vs OpenEBS
- Trilio vs Rancher
- Trilio vs Longhorn
- Trilio vs Podman
- Trilio vs Scaleway
- Trilio vs DigitalOcean
- Trilio vs Packer
- Trilio vs Crossplane
- Trilio vs Dokku
- Trilio vs Encore
- Trilio vs Fastly
- Trilio vs Google Cloud Platform
- Trilio vs K3s
- Trilio vs Flux
- Trilio vs Vagrant
- Trilio vs Kustomize
- Trilio vs minikube
- Trilio vs Velero
- Trilio vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Trilio vs Portworx Backup
- Trilio vs HYCU
- Trilio vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Trilio vs BDRShield
- Trilio vs CloudCasa
- Trilio vs Kopia
- Trilio vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Trilio vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Trilio vs Redstor
- Trilio vs rustic
- Trilio vs HPE StoreOnce
- Trilio vs MSP360 Backup
- Trilio vs N-able Backup
- Trilio vs OwnBackup
