Backup · head to head
Clonezilla vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes

Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Backup
Kubernetes-native backup, disaster recovery and application mobility
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clonezilla the destination partition must be equal to or larger than the source partition; Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes licensing is per worker node, so clusters designed with many small nodes for scheduling flexibility pay considerably more than the same capacity in fewer large nodes.
- They diverge on capability: Clonezilla covers Disk/partition imaging, Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes covers Application-aware capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clonezilla and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clonezilla | Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | Per worker node |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows | Kubernetes, Linux |
| Founded | 2004 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clonezilla
- Disk/partition imaging
- Disk cloning
- Multicast deployment
- Multiple file systems
- Encryption support
- Unattended mode
- PXE boot
- DRBL
Only in Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Application-aware capture
- Policy engine
- Immutable targets
- Restore transformation
- Database hooks
- Ransomware detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clonezilla
- System backup and cloningnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Disk imaging and restorationnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Mass deployment scenariosnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Enterprise-scale cloning operationsnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- A platform team that must prove to auditors it can restore a production namespace, not just its disksnot Clonezilla
- Migrating a stateful application from on-premises OpenShift to a managed cloud Kubernetes servicenot Clonezilla
- Protecting Kubernetes workloads to an immutable object store so ransomware cannot delete the backupsnot Clonezilla
- A team using operators and custom resources that volume-snapshot tools silently fail to capturenot Clonezilla
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clonezilla
- The destination partition must be equal to or larger than the source partition
- Differential and incremental backup is not implemented
- Online imaging and cloning is not implemented; the partition being imaged or cloned has to be unmounted first
- The image format cannot be explored or mounted, so a single file cannot be recovered from an image
- Recovery media spanning multiple CDs or DVDs is not implemented; the recovery ISO must fit on one disc
- Clonezilla SE requires a DRBL server to be prepared in advance and the target machine to boot from the network
- Runs only on x86 or x86-64 processors and needs at least 196 MB of RAM
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Licensing is per worker node, so clusters designed with many small nodes for scheduling flexibility pay considerably more than the same capacity in fewer large nodes.
- The free Starter edition is scale limited and community supported, so it works for evaluation and small clusters but there is no gentle upgrade path when production grows past the limit.
- Backup performance depends on the underlying CSI driver snapshot capability, so on storage without proper CSI snapshot support it falls back to slower generic copying.
- Restores into a different cluster need matching custom resource definitions and operator versions present beforehand, so cross-cluster mobility is less automatic than the marketing suggests.
- Kasten protects Kubernetes only, so organisations with mixed virtual machine and container estates run it alongside a separate backup product and manage two retention policies and two sets of evidence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clonezilla
Free- FreeFree
- Disk cloning
- Multicast
- Multiple file systems
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Free- StarterFree
- Functionally the same as Enterprise
- Limited on scale and support
- Intended for evaluation and small non-production clusters
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Licensed per worker node, quoted annually
- Available through AWS, Azure and Google Cloud marketplaces
- Vendor support with SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose Clonezilla if
- You need disk/partition imaging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows.
- You also want disk cloning.
Choose Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes if
- You need application-aware capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want policy engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Clonezilla or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clonezilla starts at Free and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clonezilla or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes?
- Clonezilla starts at Free and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes at Free.
- Does Clonezilla or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes run on more platforms?
- Clonezilla runs on Linux, Windows. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes runs on Kubernetes, Linux.
- Can I use Clonezilla for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Clonezilla best used for?
- Clonezilla is most often used for system backup and cloning, disk imaging and restoration, mass deployment scenarios, enterprise-scale cloning operations. Of those, system backup and cloning and disk imaging and restoration are not what Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes is typically brought in for.
- What can Clonezilla do that Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes cannot?
- Clonezilla covers Disk/partition imaging, Disk cloning, Multicast deployment, Multiple file systems. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes covers Application-aware capture, Policy engine, Immutable targets, Restore transformation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clonezilla: Is Clonezilla free?
Yes, Clonezilla is completely free and open-source software licensed under GNU General Public License version 2. There are no paid versions, premium features, or subscription costs.
SourceVeeam Kasten for Kubernetes: Is Kasten K10 still a product?
It is now sold as Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes. The kasten.io domain redirects to Veeam and the documentation still lives at docs.kasten.io.
Clonezilla: What Clonezilla editions are available at no cost?
All three editions are free: Clonezilla Live for individual machine backups, Clonezilla Lite Server for mass deployment, and Clonezilla SE for large-scale enterprise cloning operations.
SourceVeeam Kasten for Kubernetes: Is there a free edition?
Yes, the Starter edition is free and functionally complete but limited on scale and support, aimed at evaluation and small non-production clusters.
Clonezilla: Can I use Clonezilla commercially?
Yes, Clonezilla's GPL v2 license allows free commercial use. The software is open-source and requires no licensing fees for any deployment scenario.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes: How is Enterprise licensed?
Per worker node. Count your nodes, not your capacity, before comparing quotes, because node sizing directly changes the price.
Related pages
More on Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Other head to heads
- Clonezilla vs Backupify
- Clonezilla vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Clonezilla vs Spanning Backup
- Clonezilla vs CloudAlly
- Clonezilla vs Restic
- Clonezilla vs Borg Backup
- Clonezilla vs UrBackup
- Clonezilla vs Velero
- Clonezilla vs Amanda Enterprise
- Clonezilla vs Bacula Enterprise
- Clonezilla vs Windows Backup
- Clonezilla vs Apple Time Machine
- Clonezilla vs Trilio
- Clonezilla vs Unitrends Backup
- Clonezilla vs Altaro VM Backup
- Clonezilla vs Bacula
- Clonezilla vs CloudCasa
- Clonezilla vs Portworx Backup
- Clonezilla vs BDRShield
- Clonezilla vs HYCU
- Clonezilla vs Redstor
- Clonezilla vs Duplicacy
- Clonezilla vs Rewind
- Clonezilla vs IBM Storage Protect
- Clonezilla vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Clonezilla vs Macrium Reflect
- Clonezilla vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- Clonezilla vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Clonezilla vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Clonezilla vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Backupify
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Spanning Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs CloudAlly
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Restic
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Borg Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs UrBackup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Velero
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Amanda Enterprise
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Bacula Enterprise
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Windows Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Apple Time Machine
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Trilio
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Unitrends Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Altaro VM Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Bacula
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs CloudCasa
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Portworx Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs BDRShield
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs HYCU
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Redstor
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Duplicacy
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Rewind
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs IBM Storage Protect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Macrium Reflect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Quest NetVault Backup

