Backup · head to head
Restic vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes

Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Backup
Kubernetes-native backup, disaster recovery and application mobility
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Restic cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag; Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes licensing is per worker node, so clusters designed with many small nodes for scheduling flexibility pay considerably more than the same capacity in fewer large nodes.
- They diverge on capability: Restic covers Content-defined chunking, Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes covers Application-aware capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Restic and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes actually diverge.
| Attribute | Restic | Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | Per worker node |
| Platforms | Windows, Mac, Linux | Kubernetes, Linux |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Restic
- Content-defined chunking
- Cryptographic verification
- Deduplication
- Encryption
- Multiple backends
- Snapshot management
- AWS S3
- Azure
Only in Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Application-aware capture
- Policy engine
- Immutable targets
- Restore transformation
- Database hooks
- Ransomware detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Restic
- Encrypted deduplicated backups to S3, B2, SFTP and local disk from the command linenot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Scripted server backups with snapshot retention policiesnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- A platform team that must prove to auditors it can restore a production namespace, not just its disksnot Restic
- Migrating a stateful application from on-premises OpenShift to a managed cloud Kubernetes servicenot Restic
- Protecting Kubernetes workloads to an immutable object store so ransomware cannot delete the backupsnot Restic
- A team using operators and custom resources that volume-snapshot tools silently fail to capturenot Restic
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Restic
- Cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag
- A Windows file whose name contains a character Windows treats as invalid cannot be read by restic and has to be renamed
- Antivirus real-time protection degrades performance on Windows unless the restic binary is added to an exclusions list
- On large repositories the built-in five minute stuck-request timeout fires during file listing and has to be raised manually with --stuck-request-timeout
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Licensing is per worker node, so clusters designed with many small nodes for scheduling flexibility pay considerably more than the same capacity in fewer large nodes.
- The free Starter edition is scale limited and community supported, so it works for evaluation and small clusters but there is no gentle upgrade path when production grows past the limit.
- Backup performance depends on the underlying CSI driver snapshot capability, so on storage without proper CSI snapshot support it falls back to slower generic copying.
- Restores into a different cluster need matching custom resource definitions and operator versions present beforehand, so cross-cluster mobility is less automatic than the marketing suggests.
- Kasten protects Kubernetes only, so organisations with mixed virtual machine and container estates run it alongside a separate backup product and manage two retention policies and two sets of evidence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Restic
Free- FreeFree
- Content-defined chunking
- Encryption
- Multiple backends
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Free- StarterFree
- Functionally the same as Enterprise
- Limited on scale and support
- Intended for evaluation and small non-production clusters
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Licensed per worker node, quoted annually
- Available through AWS, Azure and Google Cloud marketplaces
- Vendor support with SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose Restic if
- You need content-defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Linux.
- You also want cryptographic verification.
Choose Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes if
- You need application-aware capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want policy engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Restic or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes better?
- Neither clearly leads. Restic starts at Free and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Restic or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes?
- Restic starts at Free and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes at Free.
- Does Restic or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes run on more platforms?
- Restic runs on Windows, Mac, Linux. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes runs on Kubernetes, Linux.
- Can I use Restic for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Restic best used for?
- Restic is most often used for encrypted deduplicated backups to s3, b2, sftp and local disk from the command line, scripted server backups with snapshot retention policies. Of those, encrypted deduplicated backups to s3, b2, sftp and local disk from the command line and scripted server backups with snapshot retention policies are not what Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes is typically brought in for.
- What can Restic do that Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes cannot?
- Restic covers Content-defined chunking, Cryptographic verification, Deduplication, Encryption. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes covers Application-aware capture, Policy engine, Immutable targets, Restore transformation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Restic: How much does restic cost?
Restic is entirely free to use and completely open source. There are no subscription tiers, paid plans, or licensing costs.
SourceVeeam Kasten for Kubernetes: Is Kasten K10 still a product?
It is now sold as Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes. The kasten.io domain redirects to Veeam and the documentation still lives at docs.kasten.io.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes: Is there a free edition?
Yes, the Starter edition is free and functionally complete but limited on scale and support, aimed at evaluation and small non-production clusters.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes: How is Enterprise licensed?
Per worker node. Count your nodes, not your capacity, before comparing quotes, because node sizing directly changes the price.
Related pages
More on Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Other head to heads
- Restic vs Velero
- Restic vs Kopia
- Restic vs rustic
- Restic vs Backupify
- Restic vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Restic vs Spanning Backup
- Restic vs CloudAlly
- Restic vs Borg Backup
- Restic vs Clonezilla
- Restic vs Comet Backup
- Restic vs Amanda Enterprise
- Restic vs Apple Time Machine
- Restic vs BDRShield
- Restic vs Clumio
- Restic vs Cohesity
- Restic vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Restic vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Restic vs CloudCasa
- Restic vs Portworx Backup
- Restic vs HYCU
- Restic vs Redstor
- Restic vs Trilio
- Restic vs Duplicacy
- Restic vs Rewind
- Restic vs IBM Storage Protect
- Restic vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Restic vs Macrium Reflect
- Restic vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- Restic vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Restic vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Restic vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Velero
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Kopia
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs rustic
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Backupify
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Spanning Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs CloudAlly
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Borg Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Clonezilla
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Comet Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Amanda Enterprise
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Apple Time Machine
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs BDRShield
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Clumio
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Cohesity
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs CloudCasa
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Portworx Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs HYCU
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Redstor
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Trilio
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Duplicacy
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Rewind
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs IBM Storage Protect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Macrium Reflect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Quest NetVault Backup

