Software · head to head
Clonezilla vs Restic
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clonezilla the destination partition must be equal to or larger than the source partition; Restic cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag
- They diverge on capability: Clonezilla covers Disk/partition imaging, Restic covers Content-defined chunking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clonezilla and Restic actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clonezilla | Restic |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Linux, Windows | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Founded | 2004 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clonezilla
- Disk/partition imaging
- Disk cloning
- Multicast deployment
- Multiple file systems
- Encryption support
- Unattended mode
- PXE boot
- DRBL
Only in Restic
- Content-defined chunking
- Cryptographic verification
- Deduplication
- Encryption
- Multiple backends
- Snapshot management
- AWS S3
- Azure
Both cover
- Linux support
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clonezilla
- Bare metal backup and restore of a whole disk or partitionnot Restic
- Mass deployment of a disk image to many PCs over the networknot Restic
Restic
- Encrypted deduplicated backups to S3, B2, SFTP and local disk from the command linenot Clonezilla
- Scripted server backups with snapshot retention policiesnot Clonezilla
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clonezilla
- The destination partition must be equal to or larger than the source partition
- Differential and incremental backup is not implemented
- Online imaging and cloning is not implemented; the partition being imaged or cloned has to be unmounted first
- The image format cannot be explored or mounted, so a single file cannot be recovered from an image
- Recovery media spanning multiple CDs or DVDs is not implemented; the recovery ISO must fit on one disc
- Clonezilla SE requires a DRBL server to be prepared in advance and the target machine to boot from the network
- Runs only on x86 or x86-64 processors and needs at least 196 MB of RAM
Restic
- Cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag
- A Windows file whose name contains a character Windows treats as invalid cannot be read by restic and has to be renamed
- Antivirus real-time protection degrades performance on Windows unless the restic binary is added to an exclusions list
- On large repositories the built-in five minute stuck-request timeout fires during file listing and has to be raised manually with --stuck-request-timeout
Pricing, plan by plan
Clonezilla
Free- FreeFree
- Disk cloning
- Multicast
- Multiple file systems
Restic
Free- FreeFree
- Content-defined chunking
- Encryption
- Multiple backends
Which should you pick?
Choose Clonezilla if
- You need disk/partition imaging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows.
- You also want disk cloning.
Choose Restic if
- You need content-defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Linux.
- You also want cryptographic verification.
Questions people ask
- Is Clonezilla or Restic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clonezilla starts at Free and Restic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clonezilla or Restic?
- Clonezilla starts at Free and Restic at Free.
- Does Clonezilla or Restic run on more platforms?
- Clonezilla runs on Linux, Windows. Restic runs on Windows, Mac, Linux.
- Can I use Clonezilla for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Clonezilla best used for?
- Clonezilla is most often used for bare metal backup and restore of a whole disk or partition, mass deployment of a disk image to many pcs over the network. Of those, bare metal backup and restore of a whole disk or partition and mass deployment of a disk image to many pcs over the network are not what Restic is typically brought in for.
- What can Clonezilla do that Restic cannot?
- Clonezilla covers Disk/partition imaging, Disk cloning, Multicast deployment, Multiple file systems. Restic covers Content-defined chunking, Cryptographic verification, Deduplication, Encryption. Both handle Linux support, Windows support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Clonezilla vs Backupify
- Clonezilla vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Clonezilla vs CloudAlly
- Clonezilla vs Spanning Backup
- Clonezilla vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Clonezilla vs Datto SIRIS
- Clonezilla vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Clonezilla vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Clonezilla vs Comet Backup
- Clonezilla vs Duplicacy
- Clonezilla vs Keepit
- Clonezilla vs Rewind
- Clonezilla vs Altaro VM Backup
- Clonezilla vs Borg Backup
- Clonezilla vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Clonezilla vs HPE StoreOnce
- Clonezilla vs MSP360 Backup
- Clonezilla vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Restic vs Backupify
- Restic vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Restic vs CloudAlly
- Restic vs Spanning Backup
- Restic vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Restic vs Datto SIRIS
- Restic vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Restic vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Restic vs Comet Backup
- Restic vs Duplicacy
- Restic vs Keepit
- Restic vs Rewind
- Restic vs Altaro VM Backup
- Restic vs Borg Backup
- Restic vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Restic vs HPE StoreOnce
- Restic vs MSP360 Backup
- Restic vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication


