Machine Learning · head to head
ClearML vs Passbolt

ClearML
Machine Learning
Open-source MLOps platform for experiment tracking and orchestration
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ClearML broad scope means more to learn and more to run than a focused tracking tool; Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- They diverge on capability: ClearML covers Experiment tracking, Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ClearML and Passbolt actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ClearML
- Experiment tracking
- Remote execution
- Data versioning
- Pipelines
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ClearML
- Tracking experiments across a team so results are reproduciblenot Passbolt
- Moving training from laptops to shared GPU hardware without repackagingnot Passbolt
- Versioning datasets alongside the experiments that consumed themnot Passbolt
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot ClearML
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot ClearML
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot ClearML
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot ClearML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ClearML
- Broad scope means more to learn and more to run than a focused tracking tool
- Self-hosting the server is real infrastructure — database, file storage and web server
- Documentation quality is uneven across the newer parts of the platform
- Smaller community than the most popular tracking tools, so fewer worked examples exist
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
ClearML
Free- Open sourceFree
- Experiment tracking
- Pipelines
- Self-hosted server
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Which should you pick?
Choose ClearML if
- You need experiment tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want remote execution.
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Questions people ask
- Is ClearML or Passbolt better?
- Neither clearly leads. ClearML starts at Free and Passbolt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ClearML or Passbolt?
- ClearML starts at Free and Passbolt at Free.
- Does ClearML or Passbolt run on more platforms?
- ClearML runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- Can I use ClearML for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ClearML best used for?
- ClearML is most often used for tracking experiments across a team so results are reproducible, moving training from laptops to shared gpu hardware without repackaging, versioning datasets alongside the experiments that consumed them. Of those, tracking experiments across a team so results are reproducible and moving training from laptops to shared gpu hardware without repackaging are not what Passbolt is typically brought in for.
- What can ClearML do that Passbolt cannot?
- ClearML covers Experiment tracking, Remote execution, Data versioning, Pipelines. Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ClearML: Is ClearML free?
The open-source version is free and self-hostable. Hosted and enterprise tiers are paid.
Passbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourceClearML: How much code does tracking require?
Very little — adding a couple of lines to an existing training script captures parameters, metrics and environment automatically.
Passbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourceClearML: Does ClearML replace MLflow?
It covers MLflow’s tracking and adds orchestration, remote execution and data versioning. Whether that breadth is an advantage or extra weight depends on whether you need the rest.
Passbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ClearML vs MLflow
- ClearML vs Weights & Biases
- ClearML vs Comet ML
- ClearML vs Neptune.ai
- ClearML vs Dataiku
- ClearML vs Pachyderm
- ClearML vs Azure Machine Learning
- ClearML vs Domino Data Lab
- ClearML vs DVC
- ClearML vs AWS SageMaker
- ClearML vs Google Vertex AI
- ClearML vs DataRobot
- ClearML vs Pinecone
- ClearML vs Python
- ClearML vs PyTorch
- ClearML vs scikit-learn
- ClearML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- ClearML vs Weaviate
- ClearML vs Bitwarden
- ClearML vs LastPass
- ClearML vs authentik
- ClearML vs 1Password
- ClearML vs Authelia
- ClearML vs Enpass
- ClearML vs HashiCorp Vault
- ClearML vs Infisical
- ClearML vs Norton 360
- ClearML vs Semgrep
- ClearML vs Trivy
- ClearML vs Chainguard
- ClearML vs Trulioo
- ClearML vs Unit21
- ClearML vs Veracode
- ClearML vs Very Good Security
- ClearML vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- ClearML vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs MLflow
- Passbolt vs Weights & Biases
- Passbolt vs Comet ML
- Passbolt vs Neptune.ai
- Passbolt vs Dataiku
- Passbolt vs Pachyderm
- Passbolt vs Azure Machine Learning
- Passbolt vs Domino Data Lab
- Passbolt vs DVC
- Passbolt vs AWS SageMaker
- Passbolt vs Google Vertex AI
- Passbolt vs DataRobot
- Passbolt vs Pinecone
- Passbolt vs Python
- Passbolt vs PyTorch
- Passbolt vs scikit-learn
- Passbolt vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Passbolt vs Weaviate
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe
