Machine Learning · head to head
ClearML vs Neptune.ai

ClearML
Machine Learning
Open-source MLOps platform for experiment tracking and orchestration
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ClearML broad scope means more to learn and more to run than a focused tracking tool; Neptune.ai free tier limited to 100 hours per month, exhausted quickly with serious ML work
- They diverge on capability: ClearML covers Remote execution, Neptune.ai covers Model registry.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ClearML and Neptune.ai actually diverge.
| Attribute | ClearML | Neptune.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source self-hosted, with paid hosted and enterprise tiers | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes | Web, Self-hosted |
| Founded | Unknown | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ClearML
- Remote execution
- Data versioning
- Pipelines
Only in Neptune.ai
- Model registry
- Metadata logging
- Comparison views
- Custom dashboards
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- Keras
- scikit-learn
Both cover
- Experiment tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ClearML
- Tracking experiments across a team so results are reproduciblenot Neptune.ai
- Moving training from laptops to shared GPU hardware without repackagingnot Neptune.ai
- Versioning datasets alongside the experiments that consumed themnot Neptune.ai
Neptune.ai
- Machine learningnot ClearML
- Data analysisnot ClearML
- Model trainingnot ClearML
- Predictive analyticsnot ClearML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ClearML
- Broad scope means more to learn and more to run than a focused tracking tool
- Self-hosting the server is real infrastructure — database, file storage and web server
- Documentation quality is uneven across the newer parts of the platform
- Smaller community than the most popular tracking tools, so fewer worked examples exist
Neptune.ai
- Free tier limited to 100 hours per month, exhausted quickly with serious ML work
- Lacks hyperparameter sweeps compared to Weights and Biases
- No pipeline orchestration or broader MLOps lifecycle management
- Dashboard visualization limitations - automatic resizing affects visualization order and size
- Cloud-based SaaS only (as of last available service) requires internet connectivity
Pricing, plan by plan
ClearML
Free- Open sourceFree
- Experiment tracking
- Pipelines
- Self-hosted server
Neptune.ai
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Neptune.ai review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ClearML if
- You need remote execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want data versioning.
Choose Neptune.ai if
- You need model registry.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want metadata logging.
Questions people ask
- Is ClearML or Neptune.ai better?
- Neither clearly leads. ClearML starts at Free and Neptune.ai at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ClearML or Neptune.ai?
- ClearML starts at Free and Neptune.ai at Free.
- Does ClearML or Neptune.ai run on more platforms?
- ClearML runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Neptune.ai runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use ClearML for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ClearML best used for?
- ClearML is most often used for tracking experiments across a team so results are reproducible, moving training from laptops to shared gpu hardware without repackaging, versioning datasets alongside the experiments that consumed them. Of those, tracking experiments across a team so results are reproducible and moving training from laptops to shared gpu hardware without repackaging are not what Neptune.ai is typically brought in for.
- What can ClearML do that Neptune.ai cannot?
- ClearML covers Remote execution, Data versioning, Pipelines. Neptune.ai covers Model registry, Metadata logging, Comparison views, Custom dashboards. Both handle Experiment tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ClearML: Is ClearML free?
The open-source version is free and self-hostable. Hosted and enterprise tiers are paid.
Neptune.ai: Does Neptune.ai support self-hosting?
Yes. Neptune can be self-hosted on a Kubernetes cluster with ClickHouse, MySQL, and Redis dependencies, allowing organizations to maintain full data control.
SourceClearML: How much code does tracking require?
Very little — adding a couple of lines to an existing training script captures parameters, metrics and environment automatically.
Neptune.ai: What machine learning frameworks does Neptune integrate with?
Neptune integrates with PyTorch, TensorFlow, Keras, scikit-learn, XGBoost, LightGBM, Hugging Face Transformers, and Optuna for hyperparameter optimization.
SourceClearML: Does ClearML replace MLflow?
It covers MLflow’s tracking and adds orchestration, remote execution and data versioning. Whether that breadth is an advantage or extra weight depends on whether you need the rest.
Neptune.ai: What is the cost for a team of 10 data scientists?
Neptune's Team plan costs $49 per user per month, resulting in $490/month for 10 users, comparable to Weights and Biases at $50/user.
SourceNeptune.ai: When is Neptune.ai shutting down?
Neptune.ai is shutting down its external SaaS service on March 5, 2026, following its acquisition by OpenAI in December 2025. Customers must export and migrate data before that date.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ClearML vs MLflow
- ClearML vs Weights & Biases
- ClearML vs Comet ML
- ClearML vs Dataiku
- ClearML vs Pachyderm
- ClearML vs Azure Machine Learning
- ClearML vs Domino Data Lab
- ClearML vs DVC
- ClearML vs AWS SageMaker
- ClearML vs Google Vertex AI
- ClearML vs DataRobot
- ClearML vs Pinecone
- ClearML vs Python
- ClearML vs PyTorch
- ClearML vs scikit-learn
- ClearML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- ClearML vs Weaviate
- ClearML vs Kubeflow
- ClearML vs H2O.ai
- ClearML vs Hugging Face
- ClearML vs Langwatch
- ClearML vs LlamaIndex
- ClearML vs Milvus
- Neptune.ai vs MLflow
- Neptune.ai vs Weights & Biases
- Neptune.ai vs Comet ML
- Neptune.ai vs Dataiku
- Neptune.ai vs Pachyderm
- Neptune.ai vs Azure Machine Learning
- Neptune.ai vs Domino Data Lab
- Neptune.ai vs DVC
- Neptune.ai vs AWS SageMaker
- Neptune.ai vs Google Vertex AI
- Neptune.ai vs DataRobot
- Neptune.ai vs Pinecone
- Neptune.ai vs Python
- Neptune.ai vs PyTorch
- Neptune.ai vs scikit-learn
- Neptune.ai vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Neptune.ai vs Weaviate
- Neptune.ai vs Kubeflow
- Neptune.ai vs H2O.ai
- Neptune.ai vs Hugging Face
- Neptune.ai vs Langwatch
- Neptune.ai vs LlamaIndex
- Neptune.ai vs Milvus

