Government · head to head
CKAN vs Transmit Security

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only CKAN has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CKAN the package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install; Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- They diverge on capability: CKAN covers Dataset Management, Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CKAN and Transmit Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | CKAN | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | free | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2006 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CKAN
- Dataset Management
- Data Harvesting
- API Access
- Visualization
- Extensions
- DataPusher
- Harvester
- Third-party Tools
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CKAN
- Publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portalnot Transmit Security
- Self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an APInot Transmit Security
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot CKAN
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot CKAN
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot CKAN
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot CKAN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CKAN
- The package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install
- Only Solr 9 and Solr 8 are supported, and from CKAN 2.10 they are the only Solr versions supported at all
- A working deployment requires PostgreSQL, Solr, Redis, nginx, supervisor and uWSGI to be installed and maintained separately
- Python 3.10 or later is required
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Pricing, plan by plan
CKAN
Free- Open SourceFree
- Data Management
- API Access
- Visualization
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Which should you pick?
Choose CKAN if
- You need dataset management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want data harvesting.
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is CKAN or Transmit Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. CKAN starts at Free and Transmit Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CKAN or Transmit Security?
- CKAN has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CKAN and On request for Transmit Security.
- Does CKAN or Transmit Security run on more platforms?
- CKAN runs on Web. Transmit Security runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use CKAN for free?
- Yes. CKAN has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Transmit Security starts at On request.
- What is CKAN best used for?
- CKAN is most often used for publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portal, self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an api. Of those, publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portal and self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an api are not what Transmit Security is typically brought in for.
- What can CKAN do that Transmit Security cannot?
- CKAN covers Dataset Management, Data Harvesting, API Access, Visualization. Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CKAN: Is CKAN open-source and what license is it available under?
Yes, CKAN is an open-source data management system built on Python and available on GitHub. The license terms are available on their GitHub repository.
SourceTransmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
CKAN: Does CKAN offer commercial support for organizations?
Yes, CKAN offers commercial support through certified providers including Link Digital and Datopian. Support includes advisory services, application development, integration, managed hosting, and web development.
SourceTransmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
CKAN: Who is responsible for hosting costs when running CKAN?
Organizations deploying CKAN are responsible for their own hosting infrastructure. Commercial providers like Datopian and Link Digital offer managed hosting services if organizations prefer not to self-host.
SourceTransmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Related pages
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- CKAN vs Granicus
- CKAN vs DocuWare
- CKAN vs Accela
- CKAN vs CivicPlus
- CKAN vs Socrata
- CKAN vs DataSF
- CKAN vs mySidewalk
- CKAN vs Laserfiche
- CKAN vs IAPro
- CKAN vs Bidnet Direct
- CKAN vs eCode360
- CKAN vs Axon Records
- CKAN vs CitizenLab
- CKAN vs ClearGov
- CKAN vs DemandStar
- CKAN vs MyRec.com
- CKAN vs Legistar
- CKAN vs Descope
- CKAN vs NICE Actimize
- CKAN vs Beyond Identity
- CKAN vs Sardine
- CKAN vs Feedzai
- CKAN vs Socure
- CKAN vs Unit21
- CKAN vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- CKAN vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- CKAN vs Ping Identity
- CKAN vs Stytch
- CKAN vs Rhombus Systems
- CKAN vs Semgrep
- CKAN vs Spot AI
- CKAN vs Syft
- CKAN vs ThetaRay
- CKAN vs Trivy
- CKAN vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs Granicus
- Transmit Security vs DocuWare
- Transmit Security vs Accela
- Transmit Security vs CivicPlus
- Transmit Security vs Socrata
- Transmit Security vs DataSF
- Transmit Security vs mySidewalk
- Transmit Security vs Laserfiche
- Transmit Security vs IAPro
- Transmit Security vs Bidnet Direct
- Transmit Security vs eCode360
- Transmit Security vs Axon Records
- Transmit Security vs CitizenLab
- Transmit Security vs ClearGov
- Transmit Security vs DemandStar
- Transmit Security vs MyRec.com
- Transmit Security vs Legistar
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo

