ERP · head to head
Cin7 vs Turvo

Turvo
Logistics
Collaborative TMS for freight brokers and 3PLs, owned by cold chain operator Lineage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cin7 no free trial mentioned; Turvo turvo is owned by Lineage, a large cold storage and logistics operator, so competing 3PLs are placing operational and rate data with a platform under a competitor group; the separation is contractual, not structural.
- They diverge on capability: Cin7 covers Inventory management, Turvo covers Shared shipment feed.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cin7 and Turvo actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cin7
- Inventory management
- Order management
- Warehouse management
- EDI integration
- B2B commerce
- Shopify
- Amazon
- eBay
Only in Turvo
- Shared shipment feed
- Order and load management
- Carrier sourcing
- Driver mobile app
- Accounting and settlement
- Open API
- Analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cin7
- Inventory management and ERPnot Turvo
- Multi-location inventory controlnot Turvo
- Order and contact managementnot Turvo
- Accounting integrationnot Turvo
Turvo
- A mid-sized freight brokerage trying to raise loads per operator without adding dispatch headcountnot Cin7
- A 3PL that wants its shipper customers to see live load status without building and maintaining a customer portalnot Cin7
- A shipper with an in-house brokerage arm needing one system for both managed transport and purchased capacitynot Cin7
- A carrier-facing operation replacing email and phone check calls with structured status events tied to the load recordnot Cin7
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cin7
- No free trial mentioned
- Standard plan includes only 6,000 orders annually, average 500/month
- User counts are fixed per tier: 5 users on Standard, 10 on Pro, 15 on Advanced
- Advanced warehouse management only on Advanced plan (minimum $1,199/month)
- Pricing excludes taxes
Turvo
- Turvo is owned by Lineage, a large cold storage and logistics operator, so competing 3PLs are placing operational and rate data with a platform under a competitor group; the separation is contractual, not structural.
- No pricing is published and third-party figures vary by an order of magnitude, from a few hundred to several thousand dollars a month, which makes early budgeting guesswork.
- The collaboration model only pays off if counterparties actually log in; brokers whose shippers and carriers stay on email get the cost of the platform without the headcount benefit.
- Accounting and settlement are functional but thinner than dedicated brokerage back-office systems, so many customers still run a separate finance package and reconcile between them.
- Coverage is North American truckload and less-than-truckload first; international, ocean and customs workflows are weak, so it does not suit a forwarder-led business.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cin7
$349/month- Standard$349/month
- 5 users
- 6,000 sales orders per year
- 2 integrations
- Pro$599/month
- 10 users
- 24,000 sales orders per year
- 4 integrations
- Advanced$1199/month
- 15 users
- 120,000 sales orders per year
- 6 integrations
- Cin7 Omni$null/month
- Custom pricing
- 8 users
- Flexible order volume
Turvo
On request- Turvo TMS$undefined/year
- Quoted by user count and load volume
- Implementation, data migration and training scoped separately
- Annual contracts with tiered support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cin7 if
- You need inventory management.
- You work on Cloud, Web, Mobile.
- You also want order management.
Choose Turvo if
- You need shared shipment feed.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want order and load management.
Questions people ask
- Is Cin7 or Turvo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cin7 starts at $349/month and Turvo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cin7 or Turvo?
- Cin7 starts at $349/month and Turvo at On request.
- Does Cin7 or Turvo run on more platforms?
- Cin7 runs on Cloud, Web, Mobile. Turvo runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Cin7 best used for?
- Cin7 is most often used for inventory management and erp, multi-location inventory control, order and contact management, accounting integration. Of those, inventory management and erp and multi-location inventory control are not what Turvo is typically brought in for.
- What can Cin7 do that Turvo cannot?
- Cin7 covers Inventory management, Order management, Warehouse management, EDI integration. Turvo covers Shared shipment feed, Order and load management, Carrier sourcing, Driver mobile app.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cin7: What is the minimum cost to start using Cin7?
Cin7 Core Standard plan costs $349/month (USD), including 5 users, 6,000 annual sales orders, and 2 integrations. Pricing excludes taxes.
SourceTurvo: Who owns Turvo?
Lineage Logistics, together with Bay Grove, acquired Turvo in June 2022. It operates as a wholly owned subsidiary and still sells under the Turvo brand.
Cin7: How many users are included on each Cin7 plan?
Standard includes 5 users, Pro includes 10 users, and Advanced includes 15 users. Cin7 Omni is customizable with 8 base users.
SourceTurvo: Is Turvo a TMS or a visibility tool?
It is a TMS with collaboration and visibility built in, rather than a visibility layer bolted onto a separate TMS.
Cin7: What sales order limits apply to each plan?
Standard supports 6,000 orders annually, Pro supports 24,000 orders annually, and Advanced supports 120,000 orders annually. Cin7 Omni has flexible order volumes.
SourceTurvo: Does it publish pricing?
No. Quotes are built from user counts and load volume, and implementation is separate.
Cin7: Does Cin7 offer material requirements planning on all plans?
No, material requirements planning is only available on Pro ($599/month) and Advanced ($1,199/month) plans. The Standard plan does not include this feature.
SourceTurvo: Is it suitable for a shipper with no brokerage?
It can be, but the design assumes buying capacity from many carriers. A shipper with a small dedicated fleet gets less from it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cin7 vs DEAR Systems
- Cin7 vs Fishbowl
- Cin7 vs MRPeasy
- Cin7 vs Infor CloudSuite
- Cin7 vs Visibility
- Cin7 vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Cin7 vs Blue Link ERP
- Cin7 vs NetSuite
- Cin7 vs Metasfresh
- Cin7 vs Epicor
- Cin7 vs GEP SMART
- Cin7 vs Katana MRP
- Cin7 vs Aptean
- Cin7 vs Axelor
- Cin7 vs Axonaut
- Cin7 vs BatchMaster
- Cin7 vs bexio
- Cin7 vs Bling
- Cin7 vs Rose Rocket
- Cin7 vs Alvys
- Cin7 vs Loadsmart
- Cin7 vs Transfix
- Cin7 vs McLeod Software
- Cin7 vs Transporeon
- Cin7 vs Descartes Aljex
- Cin7 vs Logiwa
- Cin7 vs CargoWise
- Cin7 vs ShipBob
- Cin7 vs Deposco
- Cin7 vs Alpega
- Cin7 vs Veeqo
- Cin7 vs Onfleet
- Cin7 vs ShipHero
- Cin7 vs Shippo
- Cin7 vs ShipStation
- Cin7 vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Turvo vs DEAR Systems
- Turvo vs Fishbowl
- Turvo vs MRPeasy
- Turvo vs Infor CloudSuite
- Turvo vs Visibility
- Turvo vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Turvo vs Blue Link ERP
- Turvo vs NetSuite
- Turvo vs Metasfresh
- Turvo vs Epicor
- Turvo vs GEP SMART
- Turvo vs Katana MRP
- Turvo vs Aptean
- Turvo vs Axelor
- Turvo vs Axonaut
- Turvo vs BatchMaster
- Turvo vs bexio
- Turvo vs Bling
- Turvo vs Rose Rocket
- Turvo vs Alvys
- Turvo vs Loadsmart
- Turvo vs Transfix
- Turvo vs McLeod Software
- Turvo vs Transporeon
- Turvo vs Descartes Aljex
- Turvo vs Logiwa
- Turvo vs CargoWise
- Turvo vs ShipBob
- Turvo vs Deposco
- Turvo vs Alpega
- Turvo vs Veeqo
- Turvo vs Onfleet
- Turvo vs ShipHero
- Turvo vs Shippo
- Turvo vs ShipStation
- Turvo vs Descartes MacroPoint

