Technology · head to head
Checkmk vs Fig

Checkmk
Technology
Comprehensive IT monitoring, open and flexible
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Checkmk pricing calculated by service count, not hosts (approximately 30 services per host on average); Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Checkmk and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Checkmk
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Fig
- System observabilitynot Fig
- Enterprise compliance monitoringnot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Checkmk
- Pricing calculated by service count, not hosts (approximately 30 services per host on average)
- Professional support limited to 8-10 hours per week on base plans
- Synthetic monitoring is separate add-on with per-test pricing
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
Checkmk
Free- Community (Self-Hosted)Free
- No cost, forever
- Up to ~100 hosts
- Basic infrastructure monitoring
- Pro (Self-Hosted)$190/month
- Advanced analytics
- Reporting
- Distributed monitoring
- Ultimate (Self-Hosted)$275/month
- Full-stack observability
- Advanced security compliance
- 10 hours x 5 days professional support (upgradable to 24/7)
- CloudAI (SaaS)$240/month
- Fully managed cloud hosting
- 99.5% uptime SLA
- Supports up to 50000 services
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Checkmk or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Checkmk starts at Free and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Checkmk or Fig?
- Checkmk starts at Free and Fig at Free.
- Does Checkmk or Fig run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Checkmk for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Checkmk best used for?
- Checkmk is most often used for infrastructure monitoring, system observability, enterprise compliance monitoring. Of those, infrastructure monitoring and system observability are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Checkmk: Is there a free version of Checkmk?
Yes, Checkmk Community edition is free forever and supports up to approximately 100 hosts for basic infrastructure monitoring with no cost.
SourceCheckmk: How does Checkmk calculate pricing by host count?
Checkmk uses service-based pricing where each monitored aspect (file system, hardware sensor, switch port, metric) counts as one service. On average, there are approximately 30 services per host.
SourceCheckmk: What is the difference between Checkmk Pro and Ultimate tiers?
Pro tier at 190 EUR/month includes advanced analytics and 8x5 support, while Ultimate at 275 EUR/month adds full-stack observability, advanced compliance features, and upgradable 24/7 support.
SourceCheckmk: Does Checkmk offer a managed SaaS option?
Yes, Checkmk CloudAI is a fully managed SaaS tier at 240 EUR/month with 99.5% uptime SLA and support for up to 50000 services.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Checkmk vs Asana
- Checkmk vs ClickUp
- Checkmk vs Figma
- Checkmk vs Linear
- Checkmk vs Sentry
- Checkmk vs Nagios XI
- Checkmk vs Eclipse
- Checkmk vs Site24x7
- Checkmk vs Zabbix Cloud
- Checkmk vs Kubernetes
- Checkmk vs PostHog
- Checkmk vs Redis
- Checkmk vs UptimeRobot
- Checkmk vs Vercel
- Checkmk vs Zeta
- Checkmk vs CloudAMQP
- Checkmk vs Dropbox
- Checkmk vs Visual Studio Code
- Checkmk vs ESLint
- Checkmk vs Turborepo
- Checkmk vs pnpm
- Checkmk vs Sweep
- Checkmk vs Cody
- Checkmk vs Warp
- Checkmk vs Keycloak
- Checkmk vs Rust
- Checkmk vs CodeSandbox
- Checkmk vs Vite
- Checkmk vs Daytona
- Checkmk vs Visual Studio
- Checkmk vs Xlinesoft
- Checkmk vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Checkmk vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Asana
- Fig vs ClickUp
- Fig vs Figma
- Fig vs Linear
- Fig vs Sentry
- Fig vs Nagios XI
- Fig vs Eclipse
- Fig vs Site24x7
- Fig vs Zabbix Cloud
- Fig vs Kubernetes
- Fig vs PostHog
- Fig vs Redis
- Fig vs UptimeRobot
- Fig vs Vercel
- Fig vs Zeta
- Fig vs CloudAMQP
- Fig vs Dropbox
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
