Technology · head to head
CloudAMQP vs Fig

CloudAMQP
Technology
Managed RabbitMQ and LavinMQ clusters, hosted and fully managed
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CloudAMQP free tier messaging limits are low: 1-2M messages/month; Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudAMQP and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudAMQP
- Message queue servicesnot Fig
- Message brokers for distributed systemsnot Fig
- RabbitMQ and LavinMQ hostingnot Fig
- Asynchronous task processingnot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudAMQP
- Free tier messaging limits are low: 1-2M messages/month
- Free tier connection limits are restrictive: 20-40
- Multi-tenant plans have queue limits (200-2,000 max)
- Dedicated plans expensive at scale: up to $14,995-$17,495/month
- Extra disk space add-on at $0.35/month per GB may add significant cost
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudAMQP
Free- LavinMQ - Loyal Lemming (Free)Free
- 2 million messages per month
- 40 connection limit
- 200 queue maximum
- RabbitMQ - Little Lemur (Free)Free
- 1 million messages per month
- 20 connection limit
- 100 queue maximum
- LavinMQ - Elegant Ermine$19/month
- 20 million messages per month
- 200 connections
- 2,000 queue maximum
- RabbitMQ - Tough Tiger$19/month
- 10 million messages per month
- 100 connections
- 1,000 queue maximum
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is CloudAMQP or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudAMQP starts at Free and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudAMQP or Fig?
- CloudAMQP starts at Free and Fig at Free.
- Does CloudAMQP or Fig run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use CloudAMQP for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudAMQP best used for?
- CloudAMQP is most often used for message queue services, message brokers for distributed systems, rabbitmq and lavinmq hosting, asynchronous task processing. Of those, message queue services and message brokers for distributed systems are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CloudAMQP: Does CloudAMQP offer free plans?
Yes, CloudAMQP offers free tiers: LavinMQ Loyal Lemming with 2M messages/month, and RabbitMQ Little Lemur with 1M messages/month. Both include connection and queue limits.
SourceCloudAMQP: What is the cheapest paid plan?
Both LavinMQ Elegant Ermine and RabbitMQ Tough Tiger cost $19/month. LavinMQ includes 20M messages/month with 200 connections; RabbitMQ includes 10M messages/month with 100 connections.
SourceCloudAMQP: How are messages charged on CloudAMQP?
CloudAMQP plans include monthly message quotas. All plans are charged on a per-second basis with monthly billing cycles.
SourceCloudAMQP: What add-ons are available?
CloudAMQP offers Virtual Private Cloud add-on at $99/month, and extra disk space at $0.35/month per GB (25-2,000 GB available).
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- CloudAMQP vs Asana
- CloudAMQP vs ClickUp
- CloudAMQP vs Figma
- CloudAMQP vs Linear
- CloudAMQP vs Confluent Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs MongoDB Atlas
- CloudAMQP vs Zabbix Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs Alkami
- CloudAMQP vs Sentry
- CloudAMQP vs Dropbox
- CloudAMQP vs Jenkins
- CloudAMQP vs Checkmk
- CloudAMQP vs Aha!
- CloudAMQP vs Attio
- CloudAMQP vs Canny
- CloudAMQP vs Close
- CloudAMQP vs Coda
- CloudAMQP vs Drift
- CloudAMQP vs Visual Studio Code
- CloudAMQP vs ESLint
- CloudAMQP vs Turborepo
- CloudAMQP vs pnpm
- CloudAMQP vs Sweep
- CloudAMQP vs Cody
- CloudAMQP vs Warp
- CloudAMQP vs Keycloak
- CloudAMQP vs Rust
- CloudAMQP vs CodeSandbox
- CloudAMQP vs Vite
- CloudAMQP vs Daytona
- CloudAMQP vs Visual Studio
- CloudAMQP vs Xlinesoft
- CloudAMQP vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- CloudAMQP vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Asana
- Fig vs ClickUp
- Fig vs Figma
- Fig vs Linear
- Fig vs Confluent Cloud
- Fig vs MongoDB Atlas
- Fig vs Zabbix Cloud
- Fig vs Alkami
- Fig vs Sentry
- Fig vs Dropbox
- Fig vs Jenkins
- Fig vs Checkmk
- Fig vs Aha!
- Fig vs Attio
- Fig vs Canny
- Fig vs Close
- Fig vs Coda
- Fig vs Drift
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
