Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Okteto

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Okteto
Developer Tools
Runs production-like development environments on your own Kubernetes cluster
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Okteto two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Okteto covers Cluster development environments.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Okteto actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Okteto |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | quote |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Okteto
- Cluster development environments
- File synchronisation
- Development containers
- Environment catalogue
- Preview environments
- Bring your own cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Okteto
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Okteto
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Okteto
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Okteto
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Okteto
Okteto
- A microservices estate where no developer can run the full dependency graph on a laptopnot Chainguard
- Giving each pull request a working environment reviewers can click rather than describenot Chainguard
- Letting coding agents build and test against real databases and queues instead of mocksnot Chainguard
- Removing a fleet of local Kubernetes installations that drift from production and produce false test resultsnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Okteto
- Two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.
- The Apache-2.0 CLI is restricted to the development section of the manifest, so build services, user management and observability all require the commercial platform and the open licence provides very little continuity insurance.
- The last disclosed funding round is a 15 million US dollar Series A from February 2022 with nothing announced since, and the contributor base is dominated by company employees, which is concentrated risk for something embedded in every developer daily loop.
- You must bring and pay for the Kubernetes cluster, so node cost, capacity planning and version upgrades stay with your platform team on top of the licence fee.
- The 2026 repositioning towards AI agents means the classic developer inner loop is no longer what the marketing leads with, so a buyer purchasing that use case should confirm roadmap commitment rather than assume it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Okteto
Free- StarterFree
- 5 seats included
- Self-hosted deployment into your own cluster
- Community support
- Scale$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price, currency or billing period published
- More seats and environments than Starter
- Self-hosted deployment
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price published
- Bring your own cloud deployment
- Available through Google Cloud and AWS marketplaces
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Okteto if
- You need cluster development environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want file synchronisation.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Okteto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Okteto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Okteto?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Okteto at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Okteto run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Okteto runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Okteto is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Okteto cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Okteto covers Cluster development environments, File synchronisation, Development containers, Environment catalogue.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceOkteto: Is Okteto open source?
The CLI is Apache-2.0, but the README states it supports only the development section of the manifest. Everything operationally interesting, including builds, user management and observability, is in the commercial platform.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceOkteto: What does it cost?
Only the free Starter tier with five seats is published. Scale and Enterprise are both contact sales, with no price, currency or billing period disclosed on the pricing page.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceOkteto: Do I need my own Kubernetes cluster?
Yes. Okteto installs into a cluster you provide and pay for, so capacity, upgrades and node costs remain your responsibility in addition to the licence.
Okteto: How is this different from running Kubernetes locally?
Environments run against the same managed databases, queues and service mesh as production, so a class of failures that only appears in a real cluster is caught before merge rather than after deploy.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Tilt
- Chainguard vs Garden
- Chainguard vs Argo CD
- Chainguard vs Atlantis
- Chainguard vs Nix
- Chainguard vs Spacelift
- Chainguard vs ConfigCat
- Chainguard vs Restate
- Chainguard vs Helm
- Chainguard vs StackBlitz
- Chainguard vs Avo
- Chainguard vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Chainguard vs Nixpacks
- Chainguard vs Octopus Deploy
- Chainguard vs OpsLevel
- Chainguard vs PartyKit
- Chainguard vs PhpStorm
- Okteto vs Snyk
- Okteto vs Trivy
- Okteto vs Doppler
- Okteto vs Infisical
- Okteto vs Grype
- Okteto vs Arnica
- Okteto vs HashiCorp Vault
- Okteto vs Bitwarden
- Okteto vs Semgrep
- Okteto vs Authelia
- Okteto vs Endor Labs
- Okteto vs Tenable
- Okteto vs Hanwha Vision
- Okteto vs Idira
- Okteto vs IVPN
- Okteto vs Logto
- Okteto vs Malwarebytes
- Okteto vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Okteto vs Tilt
- Okteto vs Garden
- Okteto vs Argo CD
- Okteto vs Atlantis
- Okteto vs Nix
- Okteto vs Spacelift
- Okteto vs ConfigCat
- Okteto vs Restate
- Okteto vs Helm
- Okteto vs StackBlitz
- Okteto vs Avo
- Okteto vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Okteto vs Nixpacks
- Okteto vs Octopus Deploy
- Okteto vs OpsLevel
- Okteto vs PartyKit
- Okteto vs PhpStorm
