Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Tilt

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Tilt
Developer Tools
Local Kubernetes development loop that rebuilds and live-updates containers on save
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Tilt docker acquired Tilt in 2022 and the team now splits its time across Compose and Docker Desktop, so feature velocity is modest and the product's long-term priority inside Docker is not guaranteed; treat it as a stable utility, not a growing platform.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Tilt covers Live update.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Tilt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Tilt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Tilt
- Live update
- Tiltfile as code
- Unified web UI
- Selective rebuilds
- Local and remote clusters
- Resource dependencies
- Extensions registry
- Custom buttons and triggers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Tilt
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Tilt
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Tilt
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Tilt
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Tilt
Tilt
- A team of ten or more engineers whose application is fifteen microservices on Kubernetes and who currently wait on CI to test a changenot Chainguard
- An organisation onboarding new developers who want a single command that stands up the whole stack from a committed Tiltfilenot Chainguard
- A platform team giving product engineers a consistent local environment against a shared remote development clusternot Chainguard
- A codebase where one repository contains several services and rebuilding all of them on every edit is the main source of lost timenot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Tilt
- Docker acquired Tilt in 2022 and the team now splits its time across Compose and Docker Desktop, so feature velocity is modest and the product's long-term priority inside Docker is not guaranteed; treat it as a stable utility, not a growing platform.
- The Tiltfile is Starlark, a Python dialect, so non-trivial setups become real programs that need reviewing and maintaining, and the person who wrote yours becomes a single point of failure.
- Live update only works when the running container can accept synced files and restart the process; compiled languages, distroless images and read-only filesystems often force you back to a full image rebuild, which removes the main benefit.
- It assumes Kubernetes. If your development target is plain Docker Compose or serverless functions, Tilt adds a cluster you did not need and a layer of abstraction with no payoff.
- There is no commercial support contract, no SLA and no paid tier, so when a Kubernetes version upgrade breaks something you are dependent on GitHub issues and a Slack channel rather than a vendor you can escalate to.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Tilt
Free- TiltFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- All features, no paid tier
- Community support via the Kubernetes Slack #tilt channel
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Tilt if
- You need live update.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want tiltfile as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Tilt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Tilt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Tilt?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Tilt at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Tilt run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Tilt runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Tilt is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Tilt cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Tilt covers Live update, Tiltfile as code, Unified web UI, Selective rebuilds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceTilt: Is Tilt free?
Yes, entirely. It is Apache 2.0 open source with no paid tier and no licence fee.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceTilt: Who owns Tilt now?
Docker, which acquired it in May 2022. It remains open source and the repository is still actively maintained.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceTilt: Do I need a remote cluster?
No. It works against a local cluster such as kind, minikube or Docker Desktop, and also against a shared remote development cluster if your services are too heavy to run locally.
Tilt: How is it different from Skaffold?
Both automate the build-deploy loop. Tilt puts more weight on the live-update path and a multi-service dashboard; Skaffold is more configuration-driven and closer to Google's tooling.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Okteto
- Chainguard vs Dagger
- Chainguard vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Chainguard vs Bazel
- Chainguard vs Atlantis
- Chainguard vs Backstage
- Chainguard vs Visual Studio Code
- Chainguard vs Pants Build
- Chainguard vs Garden
- Chainguard vs Jitsu
- Chainguard vs Frappe
- Chainguard vs Nixpacks
- Chainguard vs OpsLevel
- Chainguard vs PartyKit
- Chainguard vs PhpStorm
- Chainguard vs Pieces for Developers
- Chainguard vs RAD Studio
- Chainguard vs Refact
- Tilt vs Snyk
- Tilt vs Trivy
- Tilt vs Doppler
- Tilt vs Infisical
- Tilt vs Grype
- Tilt vs Arnica
- Tilt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Tilt vs Bitwarden
- Tilt vs Semgrep
- Tilt vs Authelia
- Tilt vs Endor Labs
- Tilt vs Tenable
- Tilt vs Hanwha Vision
- Tilt vs Idira
- Tilt vs IVPN
- Tilt vs Logto
- Tilt vs Malwarebytes
- Tilt vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Tilt vs Okteto
- Tilt vs Dagger
- Tilt vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Tilt vs Bazel
- Tilt vs Atlantis
- Tilt vs Backstage
- Tilt vs Visual Studio Code
- Tilt vs Pants Build
- Tilt vs Garden
- Tilt vs Jitsu
- Tilt vs Frappe
- Tilt vs Nixpacks
- Tilt vs OpsLevel
- Tilt vs PartyKit
- Tilt vs PhpStorm
- Tilt vs Pieces for Developers
- Tilt vs RAD Studio
- Tilt vs Refact
