Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs OpsLevel

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

OpsLevel
Developer Tools
Internal developer portal that scores service ownership and production readiness
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Chainguard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; OpsLevel opsLevel does not publish prices at all, not even a starting figure, so you cannot size a budget or compare against Backstage's zero licence cost without entering a sales cycle.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, OpsLevel covers Service catalogue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and OpsLevel actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | OpsLevel |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in OpsLevel
- Service catalogue
- Scorecards and rubric
- Checks
- Campaigns
- Self-service actions
- Slack and Teams integration
- Catalogue auto-enrichment
- Deployment on request
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot OpsLevel
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot OpsLevel
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot OpsLevel
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot OpsLevel
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot OpsLevel
OpsLevel
- A platform team that needs to prove every production service has a named owner and an on-call rota before an auditnot Chainguard
- Driving a fleet-wide migration such as a runtime upgrade across 400 services with a deadline and visible progressnot Chainguard
- Giving developers a paved road to create a new service from a template without waiting on the platform teamnot Chainguard
- An organisation where an incident took an hour to route because nobody could identify the owning teamnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
OpsLevel
- OpsLevel does not publish prices at all, not even a starting figure, so you cannot size a budget or compare against Backstage's zero licence cost without entering a sales cycle.
- The Standard plan caps at 50 users, which is below the size at which service ownership becomes a real problem, so most genuine buyers land on Enterprise and its unpublished pricing.
- Scores are only as honest as the metadata teams maintain; where ownership records go stale the rubric produces confident numbers about a catalogue that no longer reflects reality, and leadership acts on them.
- It reports on quality rather than producing it, so it can generate friction between platform teams who set the rubric and product teams who see it as a scoreboard imposed on them without extra headcount to fix the findings.
- As a hosted product it needs read access to source control, cloud accounts and observability tooling, which is a meaningful vendor review in regulated environments; on-premises exists but only on the Enterprise tier.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
OpsLevel
On request- Standard$undefined/year
- Up to 50 users
- Unlimited catalogued components
- Scorecards, campaigns and the global rubric
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Custom integrations
- Customisable dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or OpsLevel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and OpsLevel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or OpsLevel?
- Chainguard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chainguard and On request for OpsLevel.
- Does Chainguard or OpsLevel run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. OpsLevel runs on Web.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Yes. Chainguard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OpsLevel starts at On request.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what OpsLevel is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that OpsLevel cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. OpsLevel covers Service catalogue, Scorecards and rubric, Checks, Campaigns.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceOpsLevel: How much does OpsLevel cost?
It does not publish pricing. Billing is per developer using the portal, with volume discounts, and a quote requires a sales conversation.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceOpsLevel: How does it compare with Backstage?
Backstage has no licence fee but you staff a team to build and run it. OpsLevel is hosted with checks, campaigns and scorecards out of the box, and you pay per developer instead.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceOpsLevel: Does it require writing catalogue YAML by hand?
No. It auto-discovers and enriches entries from connected systems, though teams still curate ownership and metadata.
OpsLevel: Can it run on premises?
Yes, but only on the Enterprise plan.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Backstage
- Chainguard vs Earthly
- Chainguard vs Cortex
- Chainguard vs Blacksmith
- Chainguard vs Nix
- Chainguard vs Depot
- Chainguard vs Spacelift
- Chainguard vs ConfigCat
- Chainguard vs Namespace
- Chainguard vs Ansible
- Chainguard vs Garden
- Chainguard vs WarpBuild
- Chainguard vs Pieces for Developers
- Chainguard vs RAD Studio
- Chainguard vs Refact
- Chainguard vs Restate
- Chainguard vs RubyMine
- Chainguard vs Soketi
- OpsLevel vs Snyk
- OpsLevel vs Trivy
- OpsLevel vs Doppler
- OpsLevel vs Infisical
- OpsLevel vs Grype
- OpsLevel vs Arnica
- OpsLevel vs HashiCorp Vault
- OpsLevel vs Bitwarden
- OpsLevel vs Semgrep
- OpsLevel vs Authelia
- OpsLevel vs Endor Labs
- OpsLevel vs Tenable
- OpsLevel vs Hanwha Vision
- OpsLevel vs Idira
- OpsLevel vs IVPN
- OpsLevel vs Logto
- OpsLevel vs Malwarebytes
- OpsLevel vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- OpsLevel vs Backstage
- OpsLevel vs Earthly
- OpsLevel vs Cortex
- OpsLevel vs Blacksmith
- OpsLevel vs Nix
- OpsLevel vs Depot
- OpsLevel vs Spacelift
- OpsLevel vs ConfigCat
- OpsLevel vs Namespace
- OpsLevel vs Ansible
- OpsLevel vs Garden
- OpsLevel vs WarpBuild
- OpsLevel vs Pieces for Developers
- OpsLevel vs RAD Studio
- OpsLevel vs Refact
- OpsLevel vs Restate
- OpsLevel vs RubyMine
- OpsLevel vs Soketi
