Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Octopus Deploy

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Octopus Deploy free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Octopus Deploy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Octopus Deploy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | subscription |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Octopus Deploy
Nothing recorded that Chainguard does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Octopus Deploy
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Octopus Deploy
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Octopus Deploy
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Octopus Deploy
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot Chainguard
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot Chainguard
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot Chainguard
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4330/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2080/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24600/year
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Octopus Deploy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Octopus Deploy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Octopus Deploy?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Octopus Deploy at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Octopus Deploy run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Octopus Deploy runs on Web.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Octopus Deploy is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Octopus Deploy cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceOctopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceChainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceOctopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceChainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceOctopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceOctopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceRelated pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Visual Studio Code
- Chainguard vs ESLint
- Chainguard vs pnpm
- Chainguard vs Turborepo
- Chainguard vs Harness
- Chainguard vs HCP Terraform
- Chainguard vs Earthly
- Chainguard vs Moonrepo
- Chainguard vs Ansible
- Chainguard vs Argo CD
- Chainguard vs Garden
- Chainguard vs GitLab CI/CD
- Chainguard vs Frappe
- Chainguard vs Git
- Chainguard vs GoLand
- Chainguard vs Hookdeck
- Chainguard vs JFrog Artifactory
- Chainguard vs Namespace
- Octopus Deploy vs Snyk
- Octopus Deploy vs Trivy
- Octopus Deploy vs Doppler
- Octopus Deploy vs Infisical
- Octopus Deploy vs Grype
- Octopus Deploy vs Arnica
- Octopus Deploy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Octopus Deploy vs Bitwarden
- Octopus Deploy vs Semgrep
- Octopus Deploy vs Authelia
- Octopus Deploy vs Endor Labs
- Octopus Deploy vs Tenable
- Octopus Deploy vs Hanwha Vision
- Octopus Deploy vs Idira
- Octopus Deploy vs IVPN
- Octopus Deploy vs Logto
- Octopus Deploy vs Malwarebytes
- Octopus Deploy vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Octopus Deploy vs Visual Studio Code
- Octopus Deploy vs ESLint
- Octopus Deploy vs pnpm
- Octopus Deploy vs Turborepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Frappe
- Octopus Deploy vs Git
- Octopus Deploy vs GoLand
- Octopus Deploy vs Hookdeck
- Octopus Deploy vs JFrog Artifactory
- Octopus Deploy vs Namespace
