Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Restate

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Restate
Developer Tools
Durable execution engine in Rust with a free tier and low-latency workflows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Restate the runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Restate covers Durable execution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Restate actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Restate |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Per month by durable action count |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Linux, macOS, Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Restate
- Durable execution
- Virtual objects
- Single binary runtime
- Multi-language SDKs
- Workflows and sagas
- Restate Cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Restate
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Restate
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Restate
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Restate
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Restate
Restate
- Payment or order flows where a crash between two external API calls must not double-charge or lose the ordernot Chainguard
- AI agent loops that call tools over minutes or hours and must survive a deployment mid-runnot Chainguard
- Replacing hand-rolled retry, idempotency key and outbox code across a set of microservicesnot Chainguard
- A small team that wants durable workflows without operating a Temporal cluster and its databasenot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Restate
- The runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- Restate Cloud jumps from a free fifty thousand actions straight to 300 US dollars a month for twenty million, so a workload sitting at a few hundred thousand actions pays enterprise-shaped money for hobby-shaped volume.
- It is a young project against Temporal’s established base, so hiring engineers who already know it is unrealistic and the answer to most questions is in the docs rather than on Stack Overflow.
- The programming model requires structuring code around durable handlers and virtual objects, which is a genuine rewrite for existing services rather than a library you add.
- The single-binary simplicity that makes small deployments cheap also means fewer operational knobs at very large scale than a system designed as separable components.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Restate
Free- FreeFree
- Fifty thousand durable actions per month
- No credit card required
- Community support
- Starter$300/month
- Twenty million actions per month
- Two hundred actions per second, bursting to one thousand
- Twenty GB storage
- Pro$1000/month
- Fifty million actions per month
- Five hundred actions per second, bursting to two thousand
- Fifty GB storage
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume
- Twenty-four seven P0 support
- 99.99 per cent SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Restate if
- You need durable execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want virtual objects.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Restate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Restate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Restate?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Restate at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Restate run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Restate runs on Linux, macOS, Web.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Restate is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Restate cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Restate covers Durable execution, Virtual objects, Single binary runtime, Multi-language SDKs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceRestate: Is Restate open source?
The SDKs are MIT. The runtime is under a Business Source Licence, which permits self-hosting but not offering it as a competing service.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceRestate: How does it compare with Temporal?
Same problem, different shape: one Rust binary with embedded storage instead of a server plus database plus workers, and lower per-step latency.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceRestate: Is there a free tier?
Yes, fifty thousand durable actions a month on Restate Cloud with no card required.
Restate: Which languages are supported?
TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Go, Python and Rust.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Helix
- Chainguard vs Rust
- Chainguard vs Atlantis
- Chainguard vs Jitsu
- Chainguard vs Okteto
- Chainguard vs Argo CD
- Chainguard vs Steampipe
- Chainguard vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Chainguard vs Deno
- Chainguard vs Visual Studio Code
- Chainguard vs Turborepo
- Chainguard vs Keycloak
- Chainguard vs Garden
- Chainguard vs GitLab CI/CD
- Chainguard vs HCP Terraform
- Chainguard vs Helm
- Chainguard vs Notepad++
- Restate vs Snyk
- Restate vs Trivy
- Restate vs Doppler
- Restate vs Infisical
- Restate vs Grype
- Restate vs Arnica
- Restate vs HashiCorp Vault
- Restate vs Bitwarden
- Restate vs Semgrep
- Restate vs Authelia
- Restate vs Endor Labs
- Restate vs Tenable
- Restate vs Hanwha Vision
- Restate vs Idira
- Restate vs IVPN
- Restate vs Logto
- Restate vs Malwarebytes
- Restate vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Restate vs Helix
- Restate vs Rust
- Restate vs Atlantis
- Restate vs Jitsu
- Restate vs Okteto
- Restate vs Argo CD
- Restate vs Steampipe
- Restate vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Restate vs Deno
- Restate vs Visual Studio Code
- Restate vs Turborepo
- Restate vs Keycloak
- Restate vs Garden
- Restate vs GitLab CI/CD
- Restate vs HCP Terraform
- Restate vs Helm
- Restate vs Notepad++
