Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Periscope Holdings

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Chainguard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Periscope Holdings actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Periscope Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Periscope Holdings
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Periscope Holdings
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Periscope Holdings
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Periscope Holdings
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Periscope Holdings
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot Chainguard
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot Chainguard
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot Chainguard
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Periscope Holdings better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Periscope Holdings at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Periscope Holdings?
- Chainguard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chainguard and On request for Periscope Holdings.
- Does Chainguard or Periscope Holdings run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Periscope Holdings runs on Web.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Yes. Chainguard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Periscope Holdings starts at On request.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Periscope Holdings is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Periscope Holdings cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
Periscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Euna Solutions
- Chainguard vs Bidnet Direct
- Chainguard vs OpenGov
- Chainguard vs Bonfire
- Chainguard vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Chainguard vs NEOGOV
- Chainguard vs ArchiveSocial
- Chainguard vs Clariti
- Chainguard vs GovPilot
- Chainguard vs mySidewalk
- Chainguard vs SAP for Government
- Chainguard vs Axon Records
- Chainguard vs CitizenLab
- Chainguard vs ClearGov
- Chainguard vs eCode360
- Chainguard vs MyRec.com
- Chainguard vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Snyk
- Periscope Holdings vs Trivy
- Periscope Holdings vs Doppler
- Periscope Holdings vs Infisical
- Periscope Holdings vs Grype
- Periscope Holdings vs Arnica
- Periscope Holdings vs HashiCorp Vault
- Periscope Holdings vs Bitwarden
- Periscope Holdings vs Semgrep
- Periscope Holdings vs Authelia
- Periscope Holdings vs Endor Labs
- Periscope Holdings vs Tenable
- Periscope Holdings vs Hanwha Vision
- Periscope Holdings vs Idira
- Periscope Holdings vs IVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Logto
- Periscope Holdings vs Malwarebytes
- Periscope Holdings vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
