Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs NEOGOV

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

NEOGOV
Government
Public sector HR suite covering civil service recruiting, onboarding, training and policy management
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Arnica has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; NEOGOV each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.
- They diverge on capability: Arnica covers AI SAST, NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and NEOGOV actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in NEOGOV
- Civil service recruiting
- Veterans preference handling
- GovernmentJobs.com posting
- Onboarding workflows
- Learning and training records
- Policy management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot NEOGOV
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot NEOGOV
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot NEOGOV
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot NEOGOV
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot NEOGOV
NEOGOV
- A city or county HR department that must run scored examinations and ranked eligibility listsnot Arnica
- A public safety agency needing policy acknowledgement records that stand up in litigationnot Arnica
- An agency replacing a commercial applicant tracking system that cannot handle veterans preferencenot Arnica
- A school district or university consolidating recruiting, onboarding and mandated training recordsnot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
NEOGOV
- Each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.
- Policy management arrived through the PowerDMS acquisition rather than being built in, and the join between it and the rest of the suite still reads as two products.
- Implementation is long and configuration heavy because the civil service rules that make the product valuable have to be encoded for your jurisdiction, and that work is billed.
- Pricing is not published and scales with headcount, so a large agency can pay several times what a comparable one pays without knowing it unless someone reads the public contracts.
- Private equity ownership since the Warburg Pincus investment has coincided with an acquisition led strategy, and buyers should expect further products bolted on rather than deeper integration of the existing ones.
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
NEOGOV
On request- NEOGOV Suite$undefined/year
- Quoted per module and scaled by employee headcount
- Implementation and data migration priced separately from the subscription
- Available through cooperative purchasing and state term contracts
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose NEOGOV if
- You need civil service recruiting.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want veterans preference handling.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or NEOGOV better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and NEOGOV at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or NEOGOV?
- Arnica has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Arnica and On request for NEOGOV.
- Does Arnica or NEOGOV run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. NEOGOV runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Yes. Arnica has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NEOGOV starts at On request.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what NEOGOV is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that NEOGOV cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning. NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting, Veterans preference handling, GovernmentJobs.com posting, Onboarding workflows.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceNEOGOV: Why not use a commercial applicant tracking system?
Because civil service rules such as ranked eligibility lists, rule of three certification and veterans preference are not expressible in commercial products, so the statutory steps end up in spreadsheets.
Arnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceNEOGOV: Can I find out what other agencies pay?
Yes. These are public procurements, so executed contract values appear in council agenda packets and state term contract listings. Read several before negotiating.
Arnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceNEOGOV: What did NEOGOV acquire?
PowerDMS, a policy management and accreditation product, in 2021, which is now sold as the policy module of the suite.
NEOGOV: Is it only for the United States?
Effectively yes. The value is in encoding US civil service and public safety requirements.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs Tyler Technologies
- Arnica vs Granicus
- Arnica vs Bonfire
- Arnica vs ArchiveSocial
- Arnica vs Clariti
- Arnica vs GovPilot
- Arnica vs Periscope Holdings
- Arnica vs Zencity
- Arnica vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Arnica vs mySidewalk
- Arnica vs Euna Solutions
- Arnica vs VUEWorks
- Arnica vs IAPro
- Arnica vs iCompass
- Arnica vs Mapbox Government
- Arnica vs Mark43
- Arnica vs MuckRock
- Arnica vs GovQA
- NEOGOV vs Semgrep
- NEOGOV vs Snyk
- NEOGOV vs Chainguard
- NEOGOV vs Tenable
- NEOGOV vs Doppler
- NEOGOV vs Aikido
- NEOGOV vs Endor Labs
- NEOGOV vs Trivy
- NEOGOV vs Socket
- NEOGOV vs Infisical
- NEOGOV vs Bitwarden
- NEOGOV vs RoboForm
- NEOGOV vs Sardine
- NEOGOV vs Semperis
- NEOGOV vs SentinelOne
- NEOGOV vs Shufti Pro
- NEOGOV vs Nessus
- NEOGOV vs SentinelOne Singularity
- NEOGOV vs Tyler Technologies
- NEOGOV vs Granicus
- NEOGOV vs Bonfire
- NEOGOV vs ArchiveSocial
- NEOGOV vs Clariti
- NEOGOV vs GovPilot
- NEOGOV vs Periscope Holdings
- NEOGOV vs Zencity
- NEOGOV vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- NEOGOV vs mySidewalk
- NEOGOV vs Euna Solutions
- NEOGOV vs VUEWorks
- NEOGOV vs IAPro
- NEOGOV vs iCompass
- NEOGOV vs Mapbox Government
- NEOGOV vs Mark43
- NEOGOV vs MuckRock
- NEOGOV vs GovQA
