Government · head to head
CentralSquare Asset Management vs eMaint

CentralSquare Asset Management
Government
Public sector enterprise asset management, sold for years as Lucity
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

eMaint
Manufacturing
Configurable CMMS from Fluke Reliability for asset-heavy operations
- From
- $69/user/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CentralSquare Asset Management the Lucity name is now only a suffix on a CentralSquare product, so long-standing customers should confirm which capabilities carry forward under the current release rather than assuming continuity from the Lucity they know.; eMaint the interface is dated against MaintainX and Limble, and this is the most common objection from technicians during a trial
- They diverge on capability: CentralSquare Asset Management covers Esri ArcGIS integration, eMaint covers Configurable without code.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CentralSquare Asset Management and eMaint actually diverge.
| Attribute | CentralSquare Asset Management | eMaint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $69/user/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month, three-user minimum |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Government | Manufacturing |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CentralSquare Asset Management
- Esri ArcGIS integration
- Public works asset breadth
- Citizen request intake
- Condition assessment
- Inspections
- Suite integration
Only in eMaint
- Configurable without code
- Preventive and condition-based
- Fluke sensor integration
- Parts and purchasing
- Compliance reporting
- Multi-site
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CentralSquare Asset Management
- A city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheetsnot eMaint
- A county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programmenot eMaint
- A public works department wanting citizen-reported potholes and blocked drains to become work orders without manual re-keyingnot eMaint
- A municipality already running CentralSquare finance that wants asset and work costs to land in the general ledger without an integration projectnot eMaint
eMaint
- Asset-heavy manufacturing with an established maintenance process to reproducenot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Teams moving from calendar-based to condition-based maintenancenot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Regulated environments needing audit-ready maintenance recordsnot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Organisations already invested in Fluke test and monitoring equipmentnot CentralSquare Asset Management
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CentralSquare Asset Management
- The Lucity name is now only a suffix on a CentralSquare product, so long-standing customers should confirm which capabilities carry forward under the current release rather than assuming continuity from the Lucity they know.
- CentralSquare is private-equity owned and grew by acquisition, so asset management competes for development attention against public safety and finance products with larger revenue, and its roadmap is not independently controlled.
- Pricing is unpublished and quoted per municipality, and asset management is often presented alongside other suite modules, so a department must work to get a clean, unbundled number it can defend at council.
- Esri ArcGIS is effectively a prerequisite for the spatial capability that makes the product worth buying, and that licence is a separate cost the software quote will not include.
- It is North America focused, aligned to United States municipal practice, funding structures and regulatory programmes, which limits its fit for local authorities elsewhere.
eMaint
- The interface is dated against MaintainX and Limble, and this is the most common objection from technicians during a trial
- Configurability means implementation is a project rather than a signup, and teams that under-resource it end up with a half-configured system
- The three-user minimum makes it poor value for very small teams
- Mobile is functional but clearly secondary to the web application
- Pricing above the Team tier is quote-based, so comparison against published competitors requires a sales conversation
Pricing, plan by plan
CentralSquare Asset Management
On request- CentralSquare Asset Management$undefined/year
- Subscription or on-premise licensing, quoted per municipality
- Priced on population, module selection and user counts
- Esri ArcGIS licensing purchased separately
eMaint
$69/user/month- Team$69/user/month
- Three-user minimum
- Work orders
- Preventive maintenance
- Professional$undefined/user/month
- Parts and purchasing
- Custom forms
- Advanced reporting
- Enterprise$undefined/user/month
- Condition monitoring
- API and integrations
- SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose CentralSquare Asset Management if
- You need esri arcgis integration.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want public works asset breadth.
Choose eMaint if
- You need configurable without code.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want preventive and condition-based.
Questions people ask
- Is CentralSquare Asset Management or eMaint better?
- Neither clearly leads. CentralSquare Asset Management starts at On request and eMaint at $69/user/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CentralSquare Asset Management or eMaint?
- CentralSquare Asset Management starts at On request and eMaint at $69/user/month.
- Does CentralSquare Asset Management or eMaint run on more platforms?
- CentralSquare Asset Management runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise. eMaint runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is CentralSquare Asset Management best used for?
- CentralSquare Asset Management is most often used for a city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheets, a county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programme, a public works department wanting citizen-reported potholes and blocked drains to become work orders without manual re-keying, a municipality already running centralsquare finance that wants asset and work costs to land in the general ledger without an integration project. Of those, a city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheets and a county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programme are not what eMaint is typically brought in for.
- What can CentralSquare Asset Management do that eMaint cannot?
- CentralSquare Asset Management covers Esri ArcGIS integration, Public works asset breadth, Citizen request intake, Condition assessment. eMaint covers Configurable without code, Preventive and condition-based, Fluke sensor integration, Parts and purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CentralSquare Asset Management: Can I still buy Lucity?
Not under that name alone. It is sold as CentralSquare Asset Management powered by Lucity, and quotes and contracts will use the CentralSquare name.
eMaint: Who owns eMaint?
Fluke Reliability, part of Fortive. That is why condition monitoring data from Fluke instruments integrates directly.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Do I need Esri?
In practice yes. The spatial asset handling that distinguishes the product depends on ArcGIS, licensed separately from Esri.
eMaint: What does it actually cost?
The Team plan is 69 USD per user per month with a three-user minimum, so roughly 2,484 USD a year at the floor. Professional and Enterprise are quoted.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Is it cloud only?
No. Both hosted subscription and on-premise deployment are available, which matters for municipalities with data residency or network policy constraints.
eMaint: Is it better than MaintainX or Limble?
Different trade. eMaint is more configurable and better on condition-based maintenance; the others are markedly better on mobile experience and speed of setup. Asset complexity should decide it.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per municipality based on population, modules and users, usually through a public procurement process.
eMaint: How long does implementation take?
Weeks rather than days for anything beyond a basic work order setup. The configurability that makes it flexible is also what makes setup a project.
eMaint: Does it suit small teams?
Poorly. The three-user minimum and the configuration effort both assume an organisation large enough to have a maintenance function rather than a maintenance person.
Related pages
More on CentralSquare Asset Management
Other head to heads
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs VUEWorks
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Euna Solutions
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs MyRec.com
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs NEOGOV
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SAP for Government
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OpenGov
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Tyler Technologies
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Laserfiche
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OnBase
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SeeClickFix
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs ShotSpotter
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Springbrook Software
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Vigilant Solutions
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Tyler Brazos
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Maintenance Connection
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Petasense
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SKF Enlight Centre
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Hippo CMMS
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Erbessd Instruments
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Augury
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs PROGNOST Systems
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Seeq
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs TrakSYS
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Sensemore
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Prodsmart
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Propel
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs ProShop ERP
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Protolabs
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs PTC Windchill
- eMaint vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- eMaint vs VUEWorks
- eMaint vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- eMaint vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- eMaint vs Euna Solutions
- eMaint vs MyRec.com
- eMaint vs NEOGOV
- eMaint vs SAP for Government
- eMaint vs OpenGov
- eMaint vs Tyler Technologies
- eMaint vs Laserfiche
- eMaint vs OnBase
- eMaint vs SeeClickFix
- eMaint vs ShotSpotter
- eMaint vs Springbrook Software
- eMaint vs Vigilant Solutions
- eMaint vs Tyler Brazos
- eMaint vs Maintenance Connection
- eMaint vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- eMaint vs Petasense
- eMaint vs SKF Enlight Centre
- eMaint vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- eMaint vs Hippo CMMS
- eMaint vs Erbessd Instruments
- eMaint vs Augury
- eMaint vs PROGNOST Systems
- eMaint vs Seeq
- eMaint vs TrakSYS
- eMaint vs Sensemore
- eMaint vs Prodsmart
- eMaint vs Propel
- eMaint vs ProShop ERP
- eMaint vs Protolabs
- eMaint vs PTC Windchill
