Government · head to head
CentralSquare Asset Management vs Maintenance Connection

CentralSquare Asset Management
Government
Public sector enterprise asset management, sold for years as Lucity
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Maintenance Connection
Manufacturing
Enterprise CMMS from Accruent for multi-site asset management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CentralSquare Asset Management the Lucity name is now only a suffix on a CentralSquare product, so long-standing customers should confirm which capabilities carry forward under the current release rather than assuming continuity from the Lucity they know.; Maintenance Connection implementation is a project measured in months, and the cost of that work frequently exceeds the first year of licensing
- They diverge on capability: CentralSquare Asset Management covers Esri ArcGIS integration, Maintenance Connection covers Deep asset hierarchies.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CentralSquare Asset Management and Maintenance Connection actually diverge.
| Attribute | CentralSquare Asset Management | Maintenance Connection |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Government | Manufacturing |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CentralSquare Asset Management
- Esri ArcGIS integration
- Public works asset breadth
- Citizen request intake
- Condition assessment
- Inspections
- Suite integration
Only in Maintenance Connection
- Deep asset hierarchies
- Labour and cost tracking
- Multi-storeroom inventory
- Preventive and predictive
- Compliance reporting
- Enterprise integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CentralSquare Asset Management
- A city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheetsnot Maintenance Connection
- A county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programmenot Maintenance Connection
- A public works department wanting citizen-reported potholes and blocked drains to become work orders without manual re-keyingnot Maintenance Connection
- A municipality already running CentralSquare finance that wants asset and work costs to land in the general ledger without an integration projectnot Maintenance Connection
Maintenance Connection
- Multi-site manufacturing or healthcare estates with large asset registersnot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Organisations that must evidence a maintenance regime to a regulatornot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Operations replacing an ageing enterprise CMMS rather than papernot CentralSquare Asset Management
- Estates needing maintenance integrated with ERP and financenot CentralSquare Asset Management
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CentralSquare Asset Management
- The Lucity name is now only a suffix on a CentralSquare product, so long-standing customers should confirm which capabilities carry forward under the current release rather than assuming continuity from the Lucity they know.
- CentralSquare is private-equity owned and grew by acquisition, so asset management competes for development attention against public safety and finance products with larger revenue, and its roadmap is not independently controlled.
- Pricing is unpublished and quoted per municipality, and asset management is often presented alongside other suite modules, so a department must work to get a clean, unbundled number it can defend at council.
- Esri ArcGIS is effectively a prerequisite for the spatial capability that makes the product worth buying, and that licence is a separate cost the software quote will not include.
- It is North America focused, aligned to United States municipal practice, funding structures and regulatory programmes, which limits its fit for local authorities elsewhere.
Maintenance Connection
- Implementation is a project measured in months, and the cost of that work frequently exceeds the first year of licensing
- Pricing is entirely quote-based with no published entry point, so early comparison is impossible
- The interface reflects its age and is a common objection from technicians used to consumer-grade mobile apps
- Overpowered for single-site operations, where the configuration burden buys capability that will not be used
- Accruent sells a broad portfolio, so the buying process involves more product than a maintenance team asked for
Pricing, plan by plan
CentralSquare Asset Management
On request- CentralSquare Asset Management$undefined/year
- Subscription or on-premise licensing, quoted per municipality
- Priced on population, module selection and user counts
- Esri ArcGIS licensing purchased separately
Maintenance Connection
On request- Maintenance Connection$undefined/year
- Work and asset management
- Multi-site
- Inventory
Which should you pick?
Choose CentralSquare Asset Management if
- You need esri arcgis integration.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want public works asset breadth.
Choose Maintenance Connection if
- You need deep asset hierarchies.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want labour and cost tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is CentralSquare Asset Management or Maintenance Connection better?
- Neither clearly leads. CentralSquare Asset Management starts at On request and Maintenance Connection at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CentralSquare Asset Management or Maintenance Connection?
- CentralSquare Asset Management starts at On request and Maintenance Connection at On request.
- Does CentralSquare Asset Management or Maintenance Connection run on more platforms?
- CentralSquare Asset Management runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, On-premise. Maintenance Connection runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is CentralSquare Asset Management best used for?
- CentralSquare Asset Management is most often used for a city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheets, a county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programme, a public works department wanting citizen-reported potholes and blocked drains to become work orders without manual re-keying, a municipality already running centralsquare finance that wants asset and work costs to land in the general ledger without an integration project. Of those, a city consolidating streets, water, parks and facilities maintenance into one asset register instead of four departmental spreadsheets and a county needing auditable stormwater and backflow inspection records for a regulatory programme are not what Maintenance Connection is typically brought in for.
- What can CentralSquare Asset Management do that Maintenance Connection cannot?
- CentralSquare Asset Management covers Esri ArcGIS integration, Public works asset breadth, Citizen request intake, Condition assessment. Maintenance Connection covers Deep asset hierarchies, Labour and cost tracking, Multi-storeroom inventory, Preventive and predictive.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CentralSquare Asset Management: Can I still buy Lucity?
Not under that name alone. It is sold as CentralSquare Asset Management powered by Lucity, and quotes and contracts will use the CentralSquare name.
Maintenance Connection: Who is Maintenance Connection for?
Multi-site organisations with large asset registers and formal maintenance governance. Below that scale, the configuration effort is not repaid.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Do I need Esri?
In practice yes. The spatial asset handling that distinguishes the product depends on ArcGIS, licensed separately from Esri.
Maintenance Connection: What does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted, and implementation is a separate line that often exceeds first-year licensing.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Is it cloud only?
No. Both hosted subscription and on-premise deployment are available, which matters for municipalities with data residency or network policy constraints.
Maintenance Connection: How does it differ from MaintainX?
Almost entirely. This is an enterprise system configured to enforce an existing process; MaintainX is a mobile app a team adopts in a day. They rarely appear on the same shortlist honestly.
CentralSquare Asset Management: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per municipality based on population, modules and users, usually through a public procurement process.
Maintenance Connection: Is it good for regulated industries?
That is its strongest case. Audit trails, evidence of preventive regimes and multi-site consistency are what it is built to produce.
Maintenance Connection: What is the biggest risk in adopting it?
Under-resourcing implementation. A partially configured enterprise CMMS is worse than a well-run simple one, and this is the most common way these projects disappoint.
Related pages
More on CentralSquare Asset Management
More on Maintenance Connection
Other head to heads
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs VUEWorks
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Euna Solutions
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs MyRec.com
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs NEOGOV
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SAP for Government
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OpenGov
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Tyler Technologies
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Laserfiche
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OnBase
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SeeClickFix
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs ShotSpotter
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Springbrook Software
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Vigilant Solutions
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Tyler Brazos
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs eMaint
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Hippo CMMS
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Litmus Edge
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Aras Innovator
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Fusion 360
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Ignition
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs SolidWorks
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs TrakSYS
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs AVEVA System Platform
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Materialise Magics
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Oden Technologies
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs OpenBOM
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Oqton
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Paperless Parts
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Petasense
- CentralSquare Asset Management vs Poseidon Systems
- Maintenance Connection vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Maintenance Connection vs VUEWorks
- Maintenance Connection vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Maintenance Connection vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Maintenance Connection vs Euna Solutions
- Maintenance Connection vs MyRec.com
- Maintenance Connection vs NEOGOV
- Maintenance Connection vs SAP for Government
- Maintenance Connection vs OpenGov
- Maintenance Connection vs Tyler Technologies
- Maintenance Connection vs Laserfiche
- Maintenance Connection vs OnBase
- Maintenance Connection vs SeeClickFix
- Maintenance Connection vs ShotSpotter
- Maintenance Connection vs Springbrook Software
- Maintenance Connection vs Vigilant Solutions
- Maintenance Connection vs Tyler Brazos
- Maintenance Connection vs eMaint
- Maintenance Connection vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Maintenance Connection vs Hippo CMMS
- Maintenance Connection vs Litmus Edge
- Maintenance Connection vs Aras Innovator
- Maintenance Connection vs Fusion 360
- Maintenance Connection vs Ignition
- Maintenance Connection vs SolidWorks
- Maintenance Connection vs TrakSYS
- Maintenance Connection vs AVEVA System Platform
- Maintenance Connection vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Maintenance Connection vs Materialise Magics
- Maintenance Connection vs Oden Technologies
- Maintenance Connection vs OpenBOM
- Maintenance Connection vs Oqton
- Maintenance Connection vs Paperless Parts
- Maintenance Connection vs Petasense
- Maintenance Connection vs Poseidon Systems
