Maritime · head to head
CargoSmart vs Turvo

Turvo
Logistics
Collaborative TMS for freight brokers and 3PLs, owned by cold chain operator Lineage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CargoSmart has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CargoSmart no pricing published on website; Turvo turvo is owned by Lineage, a large cold storage and logistics operator, so competing 3PLs are placing operational and rate data with a platform under a competitor group; the separation is contractual, not structural.
- They diverge on capability: CargoSmart covers Real-time tracking, Turvo covers Shared shipment feed.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CargoSmart and Turvo actually diverge.
| Attribute | CargoSmart | Turvo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Maritime | Logistics |
| Founded | 2000 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, Ios, Android, Api), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CargoSmart
- Real-time tracking
- ETA predictions
- Exception management
- Carbon tracking
- SAP TM
- Oracle
- Shipping lines
- TMS
Only in Turvo
- Shared shipment feed
- Order and load management
- Carrier sourcing
- Driver mobile app
- Accounting and settlement
- Open API
- Analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CargoSmart
- Logistics and cargo managementnot Turvo
- Shipping and supply chain coordinationnot Turvo
- Freight forwarding servicesnot Turvo
Turvo
- A mid-sized freight brokerage trying to raise loads per operator without adding dispatch headcountnot CargoSmart
- A 3PL that wants its shipper customers to see live load status without building and maintaining a customer portalnot CargoSmart
- A shipper with an in-house brokerage arm needing one system for both managed transport and purchased capacitynot CargoSmart
- A carrier-facing operation replacing email and phone check calls with structured status events tied to the load recordnot CargoSmart
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CargoSmart
- No pricing published on website
- Pricing model not disclosed
- Requires direct contact with sales
- No free trial or freemium tier mentioned
Turvo
- Turvo is owned by Lineage, a large cold storage and logistics operator, so competing 3PLs are placing operational and rate data with a platform under a competitor group; the separation is contractual, not structural.
- No pricing is published and third-party figures vary by an order of magnitude, from a few hundred to several thousand dollars a month, which makes early budgeting guesswork.
- The collaboration model only pays off if counterparties actually log in; brokers whose shippers and carriers stay on email get the cost of the platform without the headcount benefit.
- Accounting and settlement are functional but thinner than dedicated brokerage back-office systems, so many customers still run a separate finance package and reconcile between them.
- Coverage is North American truckload and less-than-truckload first; international, ocean and customs workflows are weak, so it does not suit a forwarder-led business.
Pricing, plan by plan
CargoSmart
Free- Professional$299/month
- Unlimited tracking
- ETA predictions
- Analytics
Turvo
On request- Turvo TMS$undefined/year
- Quoted by user count and load volume
- Implementation, data migration and training scoped separately
- Annual contracts with tiered support
Which should you pick?
Choose CargoSmart if
- You need real-time tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want eta predictions.
Choose Turvo if
- You need shared shipment feed.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want order and load management.
Questions people ask
- Is CargoSmart or Turvo better?
- Neither clearly leads. CargoSmart starts at Free and Turvo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CargoSmart or Turvo?
- CargoSmart has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CargoSmart and On request for Turvo.
- Does CargoSmart or Turvo run on more platforms?
- CargoSmart runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Turvo runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use CargoSmart for free?
- Yes. CargoSmart has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Turvo starts at On request.
- What is CargoSmart best used for?
- CargoSmart is most often used for logistics and cargo management, shipping and supply chain coordination, freight forwarding services. Of those, logistics and cargo management and shipping and supply chain coordination are not what Turvo is typically brought in for.
- What can CargoSmart do that Turvo cannot?
- CargoSmart covers Real-time tracking, ETA predictions, Exception management, Carbon tracking. Turvo covers Shared shipment feed, Order and load management, Carrier sourcing, Driver mobile app.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CargoSmart: How much does CargoSmart cost?
CargoSmart does not publish pricing on its website. Pricing is customized based on specific requirements and must be obtained by contacting their sales team directly.
SourceTurvo: Who owns Turvo?
Lineage Logistics, together with Bay Grove, acquired Turvo in June 2022. It operates as a wholly owned subsidiary and still sells under the Turvo brand.
CargoSmart: Does CargoSmart offer a free trial?
CargoSmart's website does not mention a free trial or freemium tier. Pricing and trial availability must be discussed with their sales team.
SourceTurvo: Is Turvo a TMS or a visibility tool?
It is a TMS with collaboration and visibility built in, rather than a visibility layer bolted onto a separate TMS.
Turvo: Does it publish pricing?
No. Quotes are built from user counts and load volume, and implementation is separate.
Turvo: Is it suitable for a shipper with no brokerage?
It can be, but the design assumes buying capacity from many carriers. A shipper with a small dedicated fleet gets less from it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CargoSmart vs Kaleris
- CargoSmart vs MarineTraffic
- CargoSmart vs Kongsberg Maritime
- CargoSmart vs ChartCo
- CargoSmart vs Sea Machines
- CargoSmart vs Flexport
- CargoSmart vs FourKites
- CargoSmart vs project44
- CargoSmart vs Container xChange
- CargoSmart vs Terminal49
- CargoSmart vs Freightos
- CargoSmart vs Portcast
- CargoSmart vs DTN
- CargoSmart vs FleetMon
- CargoSmart vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- CargoSmart vs Linerlytica
- CargoSmart vs MDS Transmodal
- CargoSmart vs Rose Rocket
- CargoSmart vs Alvys
- CargoSmart vs Loadsmart
- CargoSmart vs Transfix
- CargoSmart vs McLeod Software
- CargoSmart vs Transporeon
- CargoSmart vs Descartes Aljex
- CargoSmart vs Logiwa
- CargoSmart vs CargoWise
- CargoSmart vs ShipBob
- CargoSmart vs Deposco
- CargoSmart vs Alpega
- CargoSmart vs Veeqo
- CargoSmart vs Onfleet
- CargoSmart vs ShipHero
- CargoSmart vs Shippo
- CargoSmart vs ShipStation
- CargoSmart vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Turvo vs Kaleris
- Turvo vs MarineTraffic
- Turvo vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Turvo vs ChartCo
- Turvo vs Sea Machines
- Turvo vs Flexport
- Turvo vs FourKites
- Turvo vs project44
- Turvo vs Container xChange
- Turvo vs Terminal49
- Turvo vs Freightos
- Turvo vs Portcast
- Turvo vs DTN
- Turvo vs FleetMon
- Turvo vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- Turvo vs Linerlytica
- Turvo vs MDS Transmodal
- Turvo vs Rose Rocket
- Turvo vs Alvys
- Turvo vs Loadsmart
- Turvo vs Transfix
- Turvo vs McLeod Software
- Turvo vs Transporeon
- Turvo vs Descartes Aljex
- Turvo vs Logiwa
- Turvo vs CargoWise
- Turvo vs ShipBob
- Turvo vs Deposco
- Turvo vs Alpega
- Turvo vs Veeqo
- Turvo vs Onfleet
- Turvo vs ShipHero
- Turvo vs Shippo
- Turvo vs ShipStation
- Turvo vs Descartes MacroPoint

