Browser Extensions · head to head
FireMonkey vs Rakuten

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.; Rakuten minimum withdrawal amount of $5.01 creates friction for light users
- They diverge on capability: FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Rakuten covers Cash back rewards.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FireMonkey and Rakuten actually diverge.
| Attribute | FireMonkey | Rakuten |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | free |
| Platforms | Firefox | Browser Extension (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge) |
| Founded | Unknown | 1999 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
Only in Rakuten
- Cash back rewards
- Coupon codes
- In-store offers
- Price comparisons
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
- Safari support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot Rakuten
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot Rakuten
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot Rakuten
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot Rakuten
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot Rakuten
Rakuten
- Cash back on online purchases from partner retailersnot FireMonkey
- Cash back on in-store purchases using linked cardsnot FireMonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
Rakuten
- Minimum withdrawal amount of $5.01 creates friction for light users
- Quarterly payout schedule only, with months-long delays between earning and receiving payments
- Amazon cashback limited to specific categories at 1-3% rates
- Must click through Rakuten link first or cashback does not register
Pricing, plan by plan
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
Rakuten
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Rakuten review.
Which should you pick?
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Choose Rakuten if
- You need cash back rewards.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Browser Extension (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge).
- You also want coupon codes.
Questions people ask
- Is FireMonkey or Rakuten better?
- Neither clearly leads. FireMonkey starts at Free and Rakuten at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FireMonkey or Rakuten?
- FireMonkey starts at Free and Rakuten at Free.
- Does FireMonkey or Rakuten run on more platforms?
- FireMonkey runs on Firefox. Rakuten runs on Browser Extension (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge).
- Can I use FireMonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FireMonkey best used for?
- FireMonkey is most often used for running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions, restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes, editing scripts in a full editor inside the browser, injecting css globally across every site. Of those, running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions and restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes are not what Rakuten is typically brought in for.
- What can FireMonkey do that Rakuten cannot?
- FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection. Rakuten covers Cash back rewards, Coupon codes, In-store offers, Price comparisons.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceRakuten: Does Rakuten charge membership fees?
No. Rakuten is completely free to join and use. There are no membership fees, setup fees, or any charges to members. Rakuten's revenue comes from merchant commissions, not user fees.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceRakuten: Is there a cost to use the Rakuten browser extension or mobile app?
No, both the browser extension and mobile app are free to download and use at no cost.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceRakuten: How does Rakuten make money if it's free?
Brands partner with Rakuten and pay commissions to bring them customers. Rakuten shares a portion of these commissions with members as cash back rewards.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs GoFullPage
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs Capital One Shopping
- FireMonkey vs Honey
- FireMonkey vs Arc
- FireMonkey vs Fireshot
- FireMonkey vs Redux DevTools
- FireMonkey vs WhatFont
- FireMonkey vs Wappalyzer
- FireMonkey vs Ghostery
- Rakuten vs Greasemonkey
- Rakuten vs Violentmonkey
- Rakuten vs Tampermonkey
- Rakuten vs Userscripts
- Rakuten vs Stay
- Rakuten vs GoFullPage
- Rakuten vs Stylus
- Rakuten vs Pocket
- Rakuten vs Dark Reader
- Rakuten vs Raindrop.io
- Rakuten vs Privacy Badger
- Rakuten vs AdBlock Plus
- Rakuten vs Night Eye
- Rakuten vs React Developer Tools
- Rakuten vs Save to Google Drive
- Rakuten vs Vimeo Record
- Rakuten vs Vue.js Devtools
- Rakuten vs Capital One Shopping
- Rakuten vs Honey
- Rakuten vs Arc
- Rakuten vs Fireshot
- Rakuten vs Redux DevTools
- Rakuten vs WhatFont
- Rakuten vs Wappalyzer
- Rakuten vs Ghostery

