Browser Extensions · head to head
BuiltWith vs Tampermonkey
The short version
- Each has a real cost: BuiltWith free tier limited to individual site lookups with no features; Tampermonkey only source code up to version 2.9 is GPLv3; all newer versions are distributed under a proprietary license despite the extension itself being free to use
- They diverge on capability: BuiltWith covers Technology profiling, Tampermonkey covers Userscript management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BuiltWith and Tampermonkey actually diverge.
| Attribute | BuiltWith | Tampermonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | open-source |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android |
| Founded | 2007 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BuiltWith
- Technology profiling
- Market research
- Competitor analysis
- Lead generation
Only in Tampermonkey
- Userscript management
- Script editor
- Auto-update
- Cloud sync
- Safari support
- Opera support
Both cover
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BuiltWith
- Technology intelligence and market researchnot Tampermonkey
- Competitive analysis and lead generationnot Tampermonkey
- Web technology tracking and reportingnot Tampermonkey
Tampermonkey
- Auto-run custom JavaScript to add features to specific websitesnot BuiltWith
- Block ads, remove clutter, or reformat page layout via community/personal userscriptsnot BuiltWith
- Run scripts sourced from Greasy Fork or similar userscript repositoriesnot BuiltWith
- Automate repetitive web tasks such as form-filling or redirect skipping via installed scriptsnot BuiltWith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BuiltWith
- Free tier limited to individual site lookups with no features
- Basic plan severely limited: 2 technologies, 2 keywords, 2 reports
- Single login user on Basic and Pro plans
- Minimum paid plan is $295/month
- No monthly payment option mentioned; minimum 1-month term annual
Tampermonkey
- Only source code up to version 2.9 is GPLv3; all newer versions are distributed under a proprietary license despite the extension itself being free to use
- Under Manifest V3, GM_webRequest is not (yet) supported
- Under Manifest V3, GM_xmlhttpRequest fires only one progress event instead of streaming progress, requiring a responseType: 'stream' workaround
- Since v5.3.2, Chrome/Edge (MV3) requires the user to manually enable Developer Mode, or from Chrome 138+ a per-extension 'Allow User Scripts' toggle, before any userscript will run
Pricing, plan by plan
BuiltWith
Free- FreeFree
- Individual site lookups
- Limited data access
- Basic$295/month
- 2 Technologies
- 2 Keywords
- 2 Retail Reports
- Pro$495/month
- Unlimited Technologies
- Unlimited Keywords
- Unlimited Retail Reports
- Team$995/month
- Unlimited access all features
- Unlimited Pro Logins
- CRM Integration
Tampermonkey
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Tampermonkey review.
Which should you pick?
Choose BuiltWith if
- You need technology profiling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want market research.
Choose Tampermonkey if
- You need userscript management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android.
- You also want script editor.
Questions people ask
- Is BuiltWith or Tampermonkey better?
- Neither clearly leads. BuiltWith starts at Free and Tampermonkey at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BuiltWith or Tampermonkey?
- BuiltWith starts at Free and Tampermonkey at Free.
- Does BuiltWith or Tampermonkey run on more platforms?
- BuiltWith runs on Web. Tampermonkey runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android.
- Can I use BuiltWith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is BuiltWith best used for?
- BuiltWith is most often used for technology intelligence and market research, competitive analysis and lead generation, web technology tracking and reporting. Of those, technology intelligence and market research and competitive analysis and lead generation are not what Tampermonkey is typically brought in for.
- What can BuiltWith do that Tampermonkey cannot?
- BuiltWith covers Technology profiling, Market research, Competitor analysis, Lead generation. Tampermonkey covers Userscript management, Script editor, Auto-update, Cloud sync. Both handle Chrome support, Firefox support, Edge support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BuiltWith: Does BuiltWith offer a free plan?
Yes, BuiltWith offers a free tier for individual website lookups. For full features, paid plans start at $295/month (Basic).
SourceTampermonkey: How much does Tampermonkey cost?
Tampermonkey is completely free for all versions and across all supported browsers including Chrome, Edge, Safari, Opera, and Firefox.
SourceBuiltWith: What are the differences between Basic and Pro plans?
Basic ($295/month) includes 2 technologies, 2 keywords, and 2 retail reports. Pro ($495/month) provides unlimited access to technologies, keywords, and retail reports.
SourceTampermonkey: Is Tampermonkey available on all browsers?
Yes, Tampermonkey is available on Chrome 120 and later, Microsoft Edge, Safari, Opera Next, and Firefox with no cost.
SourceBuiltWith: How many users can access BuiltWith simultaneously?
Basic and Pro plans include 1 system login. The Team plan at $995/month provides unlimited Pro Logins for multi-user access.
SourceBuiltWith: What payment methods does BuiltWith accept?
BuiltWith accepts credit cards (Visa, Mastercard, Amex), PayPal, Bitcoin, and wire transfers for yearly contracts.
SourceRelated pages
More on Tampermonkey
Other head to heads
- BuiltWith vs Wappalyzer
- BuiltWith vs Dark Reader
- BuiltWith vs SimilarWeb
- BuiltWith vs Pocket
- BuiltWith vs Raindrop.io
- BuiltWith vs Privacy Badger
- BuiltWith vs React Developer Tools
- BuiltWith vs Vue.js Devtools
- BuiltWith vs Web Developer
- BuiltWith vs JSON Viewer
- BuiltWith vs Redux DevTools
- BuiltWith vs Ghostery
- BuiltWith vs Keeper
- BuiltWith vs LanguageTool
- BuiltWith vs Mercury Reader
- BuiltWith vs Momentum
- BuiltWith vs ProWritingAid
- BuiltWith vs Rakuten
- BuiltWith vs Stylus
- BuiltWith vs Violentmonkey
- BuiltWith vs Arc
- BuiltWith vs AdBlock Plus
- BuiltWith vs Evernote Web Clipper
- BuiltWith vs Night Eye
- BuiltWith vs Save to Google Drive
- BuiltWith vs Vimeo Record
- Tampermonkey vs Wappalyzer
- Tampermonkey vs Dark Reader
- Tampermonkey vs SimilarWeb
- Tampermonkey vs Pocket
- Tampermonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Tampermonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Tampermonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Tampermonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- Tampermonkey vs Web Developer
- Tampermonkey vs JSON Viewer
- Tampermonkey vs Redux DevTools
- Tampermonkey vs Ghostery
- Tampermonkey vs Keeper
- Tampermonkey vs LanguageTool
- Tampermonkey vs Mercury Reader
- Tampermonkey vs Momentum
- Tampermonkey vs ProWritingAid
- Tampermonkey vs Rakuten
- Tampermonkey vs Stylus
- Tampermonkey vs Violentmonkey
- Tampermonkey vs Arc
- Tampermonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- Tampermonkey vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Tampermonkey vs Night Eye
- Tampermonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- Tampermonkey vs Vimeo Record


