Developer Tools · head to head
Buildkite vs Resolver

Buildkite
Developer Tools
CI/CD pipelines that run on your own compute
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Buildkite has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Buildkite free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildkite and Resolver actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildkite
Nothing recorded that Resolver does not also cover.
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildkite
- CI/CD pipeline automationnot Resolver
- Test execution at scalenot Resolver
- Deployment automationnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Buildkite
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Buildkite
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Buildkite
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Buildkite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildkite
- Free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention
- Pro plan is $30 per active user per month, capped at 50 users, with only 10 of the up to 250 concurrent agents included before extra usage
- Enterprise plan enforces a 30 user minimum even though pricing itself is custom
- Hosted compute beyond included minutes is metered at $0.004 per vCPU minute on Linux and $0.02 per vCPU minute on Mac
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildkite
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 10 concurrent jobs
- 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- Pro$30/month
- Up to 50 users
- 250 concurrent agents (10 included)
- 4000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited users (30 minimum)
- Custom usage limits
- Full platform access
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildkite or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildkite starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildkite or Resolver?
- Buildkite has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Buildkite and On request for Resolver.
- Does Buildkite or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Buildkite runs on Web. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Buildkite for free?
- Yes. Buildkite has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Buildkite best used for?
- Buildkite is most often used for ci/cd pipeline automation, test execution at scale, deployment automation. Of those, ci/cd pipeline automation and test execution at scale are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildkite do that Resolver cannot?
- Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildkite: Can I use Buildkite without paying?
Yes, Buildkite offers a free plan that includes up to 5 users, 10 concurrent jobs, 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly, and 250k test executions per month at no cost.
SourceResolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Buildkite: What happens if I exceed my included compute minutes on Buildkite?
Hosted agent compute is charged separately at $0.004 per Linux vCPU minute and $0.02 per Mac vCPU minute, billed to the second with no minimums.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Buildkite: Do I need an annual commitment for Buildkite's Pro plan?
No, Buildkite's Pro plan is billed monthly at $30 per active user with no long-term contract required. All tiers include a 30-day all-access trial.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Buildkite: What user limits apply to each Buildkite plan?
Free plan supports up to 5 users, Pro plan supports up to 50 users, and Enterprise plan provides unlimited users with a 30-user minimum.
SourceResolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Buildkite vs Depot
- Buildkite vs Dagger
- Buildkite vs pnpm
- Buildkite vs Turborepo
- Buildkite vs Visual Studio Code
- Buildkite vs ESLint
- Buildkite vs GitLab CI/CD
- Buildkite vs Keycloak
- Buildkite vs Nx Cloud
- Buildkite vs Yarn
- Buildkite vs Atlantis
- Buildkite vs Coder
- Buildkite vs Garden
- Buildkite vs HCP Terraform
- Buildkite vs Helm
- Buildkite vs Jitsu
- Buildkite vs LogicManager
- Buildkite vs Diligent
- Buildkite vs MetricStream
- Buildkite vs NICE Actimize
- Buildkite vs Omada Identity
- Buildkite vs Sardine
- Buildkite vs Silent Eight
- Buildkite vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Buildkite vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Buildkite vs OneTrust
- Buildkite vs Rhombus Systems
- Buildkite vs Trulioo
- Buildkite vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Buildkite vs ExpressVPN
- Buildkite vs Falco
- Buildkite vs Fenergo
- Buildkite vs Google Authenticator
- Buildkite vs Grype
- Resolver vs Depot
- Resolver vs Dagger
- Resolver vs pnpm
- Resolver vs Turborepo
- Resolver vs Visual Studio Code
- Resolver vs ESLint
- Resolver vs GitLab CI/CD
- Resolver vs Keycloak
- Resolver vs Nx Cloud
- Resolver vs Yarn
- Resolver vs Atlantis
- Resolver vs Coder
- Resolver vs Garden
- Resolver vs HCP Terraform
- Resolver vs Helm
- Resolver vs Jitsu
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
