APIs · head to head
Bruno vs Trivy

Bruno
APIs
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trivy
Cybersecurity
Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; Trivy reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, Trivy covers Multi-target scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bruno and Trivy actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- GitHub
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
Only in Trivy
- Multi-target scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Misconfiguration checks
- Secret detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Trivy
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Trivy
- Offline API development without an accountnot Trivy
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Trivy
Trivy
- Failing a pull request when a container image introduces a known CVEnot Bruno
- Scanning Terraform and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration before applynot Bruno
- Catching committed secrets as part of an existing CI stepnot Bruno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Trivy
- Reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- No built-in triage or exception workflow, so suppressing accepted risk is managed in config files
- Findings are point-in-time from CI, with no continuous runtime monitoring unless you add the commercial platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core API Client
- Limited Git integration
- 2 Workspaces
- Pro$6/month
- Core API Client
- Native Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
- Ultimate$11/month
- Core API Client
- Full Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
Trivy
Free- TrivyFree
- Full scanner
- Unlimited scans
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Choose Trivy if
- You need multi-target scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Bruno or Trivy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and Trivy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bruno or Trivy?
- Bruno starts at Free and Trivy at Free.
- Does Bruno or Trivy run on more platforms?
- Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Trivy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Bruno for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bruno best used for?
- Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Trivy is typically brought in for.
- What can Bruno do that Trivy cannot?
- Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub. Trivy covers Multi-target scanning, Vulnerability detection, Misconfiguration checks, Secret detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bruno: What is included in Bruno's free tier?
The Open Source plan includes the core API client, limited Git integration, and up to 2 workspaces at no cost. A 14-day free trial of the Ultimate plan is also available without requiring a credit card.
SourceTrivy: Is Trivy free?
Yes, open source from Aqua Security with no licence fee. Aqua sells a commercial platform around it.
Bruno: What is the difference between Bruno Pro and Ultimate plans?
Pro ($6/month) includes native Git integration and unlimited workspaces. Ultimate ($11/month) adds SSO/SCIM support, audit logs, 24-hour support (vs. 48-hour), and an account manager. Ultimate supports unlimited OpenAPI syncs while Pro is limited to 5 per month.
SourceTrivy: What can Trivy scan?
Container images, filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters and infrastructure-as-code, for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets and licences.
Bruno: How much does Bruno Pro save compared to other API tools?
The vendor claims Ultimate saves teams more than 70% versus Postman, though this comparison is promotional rather than a specific cost metric.
SourceTrivy: Does Trivy need a server?
No. It is a single binary, which is a large part of why it became a default in CI.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs REST Client VSCode
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs Apidog
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Hoppscotch
- Bruno vs HTTPie
- Bruno vs Kong
- Bruno vs Thunder Client
- Bruno vs Tyk
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Basis Theory
- Bruno vs Boomi API Management
- Bruno vs Codat
- Bruno vs Kong Gateway
- Bruno vs Grype
- Bruno vs Snyk
- Bruno vs Chainguard
- Bruno vs Semgrep
- Bruno vs Bitwarden
- Bruno vs Infisical
- Bruno vs Authelia
- Bruno vs Ory Kratos
- Bruno vs HashiCorp Vault
- Bruno vs Arnica
- Bruno vs OWASP ZAP
- Bruno vs Proton Mail
- Bruno vs Veriff
- Bruno vs Brave Browser
- Bruno vs March Networks
- Bruno vs Salient CompleteView
- Bruno vs Sumsub
- Bruno vs Syft
- Trivy vs PocketBase
- Trivy vs REST Client VSCode
- Trivy vs Appwrite
- Trivy vs Hasura
- Trivy vs Apidog
- Trivy vs Sanity
- Trivy vs Hoppscotch
- Trivy vs HTTPie
- Trivy vs Kong
- Trivy vs Thunder Client
- Trivy vs Tyk
- Trivy vs Asyncapi
- Trivy vs AWS API Gateway
- Trivy vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Trivy vs Basis Theory
- Trivy vs Boomi API Management
- Trivy vs Codat
- Trivy vs Kong Gateway
- Trivy vs Grype
- Trivy vs Snyk
- Trivy vs Chainguard
- Trivy vs Semgrep
- Trivy vs Bitwarden
- Trivy vs Infisical
- Trivy vs Authelia
- Trivy vs Ory Kratos
- Trivy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trivy vs Arnica
- Trivy vs OWASP ZAP
- Trivy vs Proton Mail
- Trivy vs Veriff
- Trivy vs Brave Browser
- Trivy vs March Networks
- Trivy vs Salient CompleteView
- Trivy vs Sumsub
- Trivy vs Syft
