Cybersecurity · head to head
Salient CompleteView vs Trivy

Salient CompleteView
Cybersecurity
Per-camera licensed video management software with unlimited client workstations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Trivy
Cybersecurity
Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Trivy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Salient CompleteView the third-party integration ecosystem is much smaller than Milestone's, so a specialist analytics, LPR or access control requirement is more likely to need custom integration work.; Trivy reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- They diverge on capability: Salient CompleteView covers One licence per camera, Trivy covers Multi-target scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Salient CompleteView and Trivy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Salient CompleteView | Trivy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Salient CompleteView
- One licence per camera
- Open camera support
- Perpetual or subscription
- Recording server architecture
- Video wall
- Cloud Services
- Forensic search
- First responder access
Only in Trivy
- Multi-target scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Misconfiguration checks
- Secret detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Salient CompleteView
- A school district where dozens of administrators and resource officers need viewing access without per-seat licencesnot Trivy
- A hospital campus consolidating legacy recorders under one recording architecturenot Trivy
- A city department needing first responder access to specific cameras during an incidentnot Trivy
- An integrator deploying a mid-sized site where an enterprise VMS would be over-engineerednot Trivy
Trivy
- Failing a pull request when a container image introduces a known CVEnot Salient CompleteView
- Scanning Terraform and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration before applynot Salient CompleteView
- Catching committed secrets as part of an existing CI stepnot Salient CompleteView
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Salient CompleteView
- The third-party integration ecosystem is much smaller than Milestone's, so a specialist analytics, LPR or access control requirement is more likely to need custom integration work.
- It is Windows server based with a conventional recording architecture, so it carries the server, storage and maintenance burden that cloud-native competitors remove entirely.
- International presence is limited and the channel is concentrated in North America, so buyers elsewhere face thin support and few experienced integrators.
- No current pricing is published; distribution list prices circulate but the actual number depends on the integrator, which makes competitive comparison slow.
- Brand recognition is lower than the market leaders, which matters in public procurement where specifications are sometimes written around a named competitor and a substitution has to be argued.
Trivy
- Reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- No built-in triage or exception workflow, so suppressing accepted risk is managed in config files
- Findings are point-in-time from CI, with no continuous runtime monitoring unless you add the commercial platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Salient CompleteView
On request- CompleteView$undefined/one-time
- One licence per IP camera, sold through distribution
- No charge or licence for client workstations, unlimited clients
- Perpetual and subscription licensing both available
Trivy
Free- TrivyFree
- Full scanner
- Unlimited scans
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Salient CompleteView if
- You need one licence per camera.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want open camera support.
Choose Trivy if
- You need multi-target scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Salient CompleteView or Trivy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Salient CompleteView starts at On request and Trivy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Salient CompleteView or Trivy?
- Trivy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Salient CompleteView and Free for Trivy.
- Does Salient CompleteView or Trivy run on more platforms?
- Salient CompleteView runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Trivy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Trivy for free?
- Yes. Trivy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Salient CompleteView starts at On request.
- What is Salient CompleteView best used for?
- Salient CompleteView is most often used for a school district where dozens of administrators and resource officers need viewing access without per-seat licences, a hospital campus consolidating legacy recorders under one recording architecture, a city department needing first responder access to specific cameras during an incident, an integrator deploying a mid-sized site where an enterprise vms would be over-engineered. Of those, a school district where dozens of administrators and resource officers need viewing access without per-seat licences and a hospital campus consolidating legacy recorders under one recording architecture are not what Trivy is typically brought in for.
- What can Salient CompleteView do that Trivy cannot?
- Salient CompleteView covers One licence per camera, Open camera support, Perpetual or subscription, Recording server architecture. Trivy covers Multi-target scanning, Vulnerability detection, Misconfiguration checks, Secret detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Salient CompleteView: Do I pay for client workstations?
No. CompleteView licenses one licence per IP camera with no additional charge or licence for clients and no limit on the number of client workstations.
Trivy: Is Trivy free?
Yes, open source from Aqua Security with no licence fee. Aqua sells a commercial platform around it.
Salient CompleteView: Is licensing perpetual or subscription?
Both are offered. Perpetual suits capital budgets; subscription suits organisations that prefer operating expenditure.
Trivy: What can Trivy scan?
Container images, filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters and infrastructure-as-code, for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets and licences.
Salient CompleteView: Does it have a cloud option?
Yes, Salient Cloud Services, with free registration for an asset dashboard and paid upgrades for remote access, monitoring and first responder connectivity.
Trivy: Does Trivy need a server?
No. It is a single binary, which is a large part of why it became a default in CI.
Salient CompleteView: What version is current?
CompleteView 8.0 is the current release line.
Related pages
More on Salient CompleteView
Other head to heads
- Salient CompleteView vs Milestone XProtect
- Salient CompleteView vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Salient CompleteView vs Rhombus Systems
- Salient CompleteView vs DTiQ
- Salient CompleteView vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Salient CompleteView vs Genetec Security Center
- Salient CompleteView vs Hanwha Vision
- Salient CompleteView vs March Networks
- Salient CompleteView vs Dahua Technology
- Salient CompleteView vs Camio
- Salient CompleteView vs Envysion
- Salient CompleteView vs Spot AI
- Salient CompleteView vs KnowBe4
- Salient CompleteView vs Legit Security
- Salient CompleteView vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Salient CompleteView vs Metasploit
- Salient CompleteView vs MetricStream
- Salient CompleteView vs Microsoft Defender
- Salient CompleteView vs Grype
- Salient CompleteView vs Snyk
- Salient CompleteView vs Chainguard
- Salient CompleteView vs Semgrep
- Salient CompleteView vs Bitwarden
- Salient CompleteView vs Infisical
- Salient CompleteView vs Authelia
- Salient CompleteView vs Ory Kratos
- Salient CompleteView vs HashiCorp Vault
- Salient CompleteView vs Arnica
- Salient CompleteView vs OWASP ZAP
- Salient CompleteView vs Proton Mail
- Salient CompleteView vs Veriff
- Salient CompleteView vs Brave Browser
- Salient CompleteView vs Sumsub
- Salient CompleteView vs Syft
- Trivy vs Milestone XProtect
- Trivy vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Trivy vs Rhombus Systems
- Trivy vs DTiQ
- Trivy vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Trivy vs Genetec Security Center
- Trivy vs Hanwha Vision
- Trivy vs March Networks
- Trivy vs Dahua Technology
- Trivy vs Camio
- Trivy vs Envysion
- Trivy vs Spot AI
- Trivy vs KnowBe4
- Trivy vs Legit Security
- Trivy vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Trivy vs Metasploit
- Trivy vs MetricStream
- Trivy vs Microsoft Defender
- Trivy vs Grype
- Trivy vs Snyk
- Trivy vs Chainguard
- Trivy vs Semgrep
- Trivy vs Bitwarden
- Trivy vs Infisical
- Trivy vs Authelia
- Trivy vs Ory Kratos
- Trivy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trivy vs Arnica
- Trivy vs OWASP ZAP
- Trivy vs Proton Mail
- Trivy vs Veriff
- Trivy vs Brave Browser
- Trivy vs Sumsub
- Trivy vs Syft
