APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Trivy

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trivy
Cybersecurity
Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Trivy reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Trivy covers Multi-target scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Trivy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Trivy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | web, linux, api | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | APIs | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2017 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Trivy
- Multi-target scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Misconfiguration checks
- Secret detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Trivy
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Trivy
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Trivy
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Trivy
Trivy
- Failing a pull request when a container image introduces a known CVEnot Kong Gateway
- Scanning Terraform and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration before applynot Kong Gateway
- Catching committed secrets as part of an existing CI stepnot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Trivy
- Reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- No built-in triage or exception workflow, so suppressing accepted risk is managed in config files
- Findings are point-in-time from CI, with no continuous runtime monitoring unless you add the commercial platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Trivy
Free- TrivyFree
- Full scanner
- Unlimited scans
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Trivy if
- You need multi-target scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Trivy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Trivy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Trivy?
- Kong Gateway starts at Free and Trivy at Free.
- Does Kong Gateway or Trivy run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Trivy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Trivy is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Trivy cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Trivy covers Multi-target scanning, Vulnerability detection, Misconfiguration checks, Secret detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceTrivy: Is Trivy free?
Yes, open source from Aqua Security with no licence fee. Aqua sells a commercial platform around it.
Kong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceTrivy: What can Trivy scan?
Container images, filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters and infrastructure-as-code, for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets and licences.
Kong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceTrivy: Does Trivy need a server?
No. It is a single binary, which is a large part of why it became a default in CI.
Related pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs Grype
- Kong Gateway vs Snyk
- Kong Gateway vs Chainguard
- Kong Gateway vs Semgrep
- Kong Gateway vs Bitwarden
- Kong Gateway vs Infisical
- Kong Gateway vs Authelia
- Kong Gateway vs Ory Kratos
- Kong Gateway vs HashiCorp Vault
- Kong Gateway vs Arnica
- Kong Gateway vs OWASP ZAP
- Kong Gateway vs Proton Mail
- Kong Gateway vs Veriff
- Kong Gateway vs Brave Browser
- Kong Gateway vs March Networks
- Kong Gateway vs Salient CompleteView
- Kong Gateway vs Sumsub
- Kong Gateway vs Syft
- Trivy vs Tyk
- Trivy vs Moesif
- Trivy vs Treblle
- Trivy vs Convoy
- Trivy vs Janus Gateway
- Trivy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Trivy vs Gravitee
- Trivy vs Strapi
- Trivy vs WSO2 API Manager
- Trivy vs AWS API Gateway
- Trivy vs GraphQL Apollo
- Trivy vs Appwrite
- Trivy vs Payload CMS
- Trivy vs Portkey
- Trivy vs Prisma
- Trivy vs RapidAPI
- Trivy vs REST Client VSCode
- Trivy vs Rutter
- Trivy vs Grype
- Trivy vs Snyk
- Trivy vs Chainguard
- Trivy vs Semgrep
- Trivy vs Bitwarden
- Trivy vs Infisical
- Trivy vs Authelia
- Trivy vs Ory Kratos
- Trivy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trivy vs Arnica
- Trivy vs OWASP ZAP
- Trivy vs Proton Mail
- Trivy vs Veriff
- Trivy vs Brave Browser
- Trivy vs March Networks
- Trivy vs Salient CompleteView
- Trivy vs Sumsub
- Trivy vs Syft
