Government · head to head
Bonfire vs Teleport

Bonfire
Government
Public sector sourcing and bid evaluation software with scored, auditable award decisions
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Teleport
Cybersecurity
Certificate-based access to servers, Kubernetes, databases and apps, replacing shared credentials and VPNs
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bonfire it is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.; Teleport pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- They diverge on capability: Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Teleport covers Short-lived certificates.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bonfire and Teleport actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bonfire
- Solicitation posting
- Sealed submission intake
- Scored evaluation workspace
- Audit trail
- Supplier portal
- Requirement matrices
Only in Teleport
- Short-lived certificates
- Protocol coverage
- Session recording and replay
- Access Requests
- Device Trust
- Identity provider integration
- Machine identity
- FIPS and FedRAMP builds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bonfire
- An agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation recordnot Teleport
- A procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and emailnot Teleport
- A university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement systemnot Teleport
- An agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing listnot Teleport
Teleport
- Removing long-lived SSH keys and shared database passwords so that offboarding an engineer takes one action in the identity providernot Bonfire
- Producing session recordings and per-user database audit trails as direct evidence for SOC 2 or FedRAMPnot Bonfire
- Giving contractors or on-call engineers time-boxed, approved access to production instead of standing admin rightsnot Bonfire
- Replacing a flat VPN with per-resource authorisation across servers, Kubernetes and internal web appsnot Bonfire
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bonfire
- It is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.
- Since the acquisition path from GTY to GI Partners to Euna Solutions, Bonfire sits in a portfolio alongside products it once competed with, which narrows a shortlist that appears independent.
- Suppliers must register on the portal to bid, and small local vendors reliably complain about the extra account, which can reduce responses on low value solicitations.
- Pricing is quoted rather than published and scales with solicitation volume, so an agency with a few very large procurements pays a model designed around throughput.
- Contract management after award is thin compared with dedicated contract lifecycle products, so agencies often buy a second system for the obligations the award created.
Teleport
- Pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- The proxy is a hard dependency on reaching production, so it needs its own high availability deployment and a tested break-glass path or an outage in Teleport becomes an outage in your ability to respond to outages.
- The open source Community Edition omits Access Requests, Device Trust and the FIPS builds, which are exactly the controls an auditor asks about, so the free tier rarely survives a compliance review.
- Self-hosting means running and upgrading a certificate authority and its backing store, and Teleport releases frequently enough that upgrade work becomes a standing operational commitment.
- Coverage across protocols is uneven in depth, so teams with legacy systems, unusual databases or bespoke network appliances find gaps that still require the old VPN to remain in place alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bonfire
On request- Bonfire$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and annual solicitation volume
- Supplier side registration is free, which is how the vendor network grows
- Implementation and training quoted separately from subscription
Teleport
On request- Teleport Community Edition$undefined/year
- Open source, self-hosted
- SSH, Kubernetes, database and app access
- Session recording
- Teleport Enterprise$undefined/year
- Cloud-hosted or self-hosted
- Access Requests and approval workflow
- Device Trust and hardware key enforcement
Which should you pick?
Choose Bonfire if
- You need solicitation posting.
- You also want sealed submission intake.
Choose Teleport if
- You need short-lived certificates.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want protocol coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Bonfire or Teleport better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bonfire starts at On request and Teleport at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bonfire or Teleport?
- Bonfire starts at On request and Teleport at On request.
- Does Bonfire or Teleport run on more platforms?
- Bonfire runs on Web. Teleport runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- What is Bonfire best used for?
- Bonfire is most often used for an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record, a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email, a university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement system, an agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing list. Of those, an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record and a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email are not what Teleport is typically brought in for.
- What can Bonfire do that Teleport cannot?
- Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Sealed submission intake, Scored evaluation workspace, Audit trail. Teleport covers Short-lived certificates, Protocol coverage, Session recording and replay, Access Requests.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bonfire: Who owns Bonfire?
Euna Solutions. Bonfire was acquired by GTY Technology in 2019, GTY was taken private by GI Partners in 2022, and the portfolio was rebranded Euna Solutions in 2023.
Teleport: Is the open source edition usable in production?
Yes, but it lacks Access Requests, Device Trust and FIPS builds, which most compliance programmes end up requiring.
Bonfire: Is it full procure to pay?
No. It covers sourcing and evaluation through award. Purchase orders and invoicing remain in the finance system.
Teleport: How is it priced?
Not publicly. The vendor prices on active users and protected resources and provides a quote after a sales conversation.
Bonfire: What is the real value?
A defensible, time stamped evaluation record when an award is protested, which is the expensive failure mode in public procurement.
Teleport: What happens if Teleport goes down?
Nobody reaches the resources behind it, so you need a highly available deployment and a documented break-glass procedure.
Bonfire: Can we see what other agencies pay?
Yes. These contracts are public records. Read several comparable awards before negotiating.
Teleport: Does it replace our VPN?
For anything you put behind it, yes. Legacy systems and appliances it does not support will keep the VPN alive.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bonfire vs Bidnet Direct
- Bonfire vs Periscope Holdings
- Bonfire vs NEOGOV
- Bonfire vs ArchiveSocial
- Bonfire vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Bonfire vs mySidewalk
- Bonfire vs SAP for Government
- Bonfire vs Clariti
- Bonfire vs GovPilot
- Bonfire vs Zencity
- Bonfire vs Tyler Technologies
- Bonfire vs Polco
- Bonfire vs SafeCity
- Bonfire vs SeeClickFix
- Bonfire vs ShotSpotter
- Bonfire vs Springbrook Software
- Bonfire vs Rock Solid
- Bonfire vs JumpCloud
- Bonfire vs HashiCorp Vault
- Bonfire vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Bonfire vs Beyond Identity
- Bonfire vs Falco
- Bonfire vs Delinea
- Bonfire vs Sysdig
- Bonfire vs BeyondTrust
- Bonfire vs One Identity
- Bonfire vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Bonfire vs Doppler
- Bonfire vs Infisical
- Bonfire vs Akeyless
- Bonfire vs DataGrail
- Bonfire vs Envysion
- Bonfire vs Feedzai
- Teleport vs Bidnet Direct
- Teleport vs Periscope Holdings
- Teleport vs NEOGOV
- Teleport vs ArchiveSocial
- Teleport vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Teleport vs mySidewalk
- Teleport vs SAP for Government
- Teleport vs Clariti
- Teleport vs GovPilot
- Teleport vs Zencity
- Teleport vs Tyler Technologies
- Teleport vs Polco
- Teleport vs SafeCity
- Teleport vs SeeClickFix
- Teleport vs ShotSpotter
- Teleport vs Springbrook Software
- Teleport vs Rock Solid
- Teleport vs JumpCloud
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Vault
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Teleport vs Beyond Identity
- Teleport vs Falco
- Teleport vs Delinea
- Teleport vs Sysdig
- Teleport vs BeyondTrust
- Teleport vs One Identity
- Teleport vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Teleport vs Doppler
- Teleport vs Infisical
- Teleport vs Akeyless
- Teleport vs DataGrail
- Teleport vs Envysion
- Teleport vs Feedzai
