Government · head to head
Polco vs Teleport

Teleport
Cybersecurity
Certificate-based access to servers, Kubernetes, databases and apps, replacing shared credentials and VPNs
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Polco interface has a formal, academic tone compared to modern civic engagement platforms; Teleport pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- They diverge on capability: Polco covers Scientific Surveys, Teleport covers Short-lived certificates.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Polco and Teleport actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Polco
- Scientific Surveys
- Live Polling
- Community Benchmarking
- Priority-Based Budgeting
- Demographic Analysis
- NRC Surveys
- ArcGIS
- Social Media
Only in Teleport
- Short-lived certificates
- Protocol coverage
- Session recording and replay
- Access Requests
- Device Trust
- Identity provider integration
- Machine identity
- FIPS and FedRAMP builds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Polco
- Citizen Servicesnot Teleport
- Records Managementnot Teleport
- Public Safetynot Teleport
- Civic Engagementnot Teleport
Teleport
- Removing long-lived SSH keys and shared database passwords so that offboarding an engineer takes one action in the identity providernot Polco
- Producing session recordings and per-user database audit trails as direct evidence for SOC 2 or FedRAMPnot Polco
- Giving contractors or on-call engineers time-boxed, approved access to production instead of standing admin rightsnot Polco
- Replacing a flat VPN with per-resource authorisation across servers, Kubernetes and internal web appsnot Polco
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Polco
- Interface has a formal, academic tone compared to modern civic engagement platforms
- Emphasizes surveys and benchmarking over open discussion forums and idea boards
- Pricing is custom quote-based without transparent pricing on the website
Teleport
- Pricing is not published and is described as active users plus protected resources, so an autoscaling estate cannot forecast the bill and finance teams discover the true cost only after the first true-up.
- The proxy is a hard dependency on reaching production, so it needs its own high availability deployment and a tested break-glass path or an outage in Teleport becomes an outage in your ability to respond to outages.
- The open source Community Edition omits Access Requests, Device Trust and the FIPS builds, which are exactly the controls an auditor asks about, so the free tier rarely survives a compliance review.
- Self-hosting means running and upgrading a certificate authority and its backing store, and Teleport releases frequently enough that upgrade work becomes a standing operational commitment.
- Coverage across protocols is uneven in depth, so teams with legacy systems, unusual databases or bespoke network appliances find gaps that still require the old VPN to remain in place alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Polco
$300/month- Community Engagement$300/month
- Community Surveys
- Live Polling
- Benchmarking
Teleport
On request- Teleport Community Edition$undefined/year
- Open source, self-hosted
- SSH, Kubernetes, database and app access
- Session recording
- Teleport Enterprise$undefined/year
- Cloud-hosted or self-hosted
- Access Requests and approval workflow
- Device Trust and hardware key enforcement
Which should you pick?
Choose Polco if
- You need scientific surveys.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want live polling.
Choose Teleport if
- You need short-lived certificates.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want protocol coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Polco or Teleport better?
- Neither clearly leads. Polco starts at $300/month and Teleport at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Polco or Teleport?
- Polco starts at $300/month and Teleport at On request.
- Does Polco or Teleport run on more platforms?
- Polco runs on Web, Ios, Android. Teleport runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- What is Polco best used for?
- Polco is most often used for citizen services, records management, public safety, civic engagement. Of those, citizen services and records management are not what Teleport is typically brought in for.
- What can Polco do that Teleport cannot?
- Polco covers Scientific Surveys, Live Polling, Community Benchmarking, Priority-Based Budgeting. Teleport covers Short-lived certificates, Protocol coverage, Session recording and replay, Access Requests.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Polco: How does Polco ensure survey data quality?
Polco uses scientific survey methodology through the National Research Center, with pre-tested survey questions and verification that participants live in the surveyed area to eliminate outside interference and bad-faith responses.
SourceTeleport: Is the open source edition usable in production?
Yes, but it lacks Access Requests, Device Trust and FIPS builds, which most compliance programmes end up requiring.
Polco: What's the difference between Polco and open discussion platforms?
Polco emphasizes scientific surveys and benchmarking over open forums or suggestion boards, prioritizing rigorous data collection for policy decisions over broad community brainstorming.
SourceTeleport: How is it priced?
Not publicly. The vendor prices on active users and protected resources and provides a quote after a sales conversation.
Teleport: What happens if Teleport goes down?
Nobody reaches the resources behind it, so you need a highly available deployment and a documented break-glass procedure.
Teleport: Does it replace our VPN?
For anything you put behind it, yes. Legacy systems and appliances it does not support will keep the VPN alive.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Polco vs CivicPlus
- Polco vs PublicInput
- Polco vs Granicus
- Polco vs mySidewalk
- Polco vs Zencity
- Polco vs Accela
- Polco vs CitizenLab
- Polco vs Bonfire
- Polco vs CentralSquare
- Polco vs CityView
- Polco vs IAPro
- Polco vs iCompass
- Polco vs Mapbox Government
- Polco vs Mark43
- Polco vs MuckRock
- Polco vs Municode
- Polco vs Bang the Table
- Polco vs Legistar
- Polco vs JumpCloud
- Polco vs HashiCorp Vault
- Polco vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Polco vs Beyond Identity
- Polco vs Falco
- Polco vs Delinea
- Polco vs Sysdig
- Polco vs BeyondTrust
- Polco vs One Identity
- Polco vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Polco vs Doppler
- Polco vs Infisical
- Polco vs Akeyless
- Polco vs DataGrail
- Polco vs Envysion
- Polco vs Feedzai
- Teleport vs CivicPlus
- Teleport vs PublicInput
- Teleport vs Granicus
- Teleport vs mySidewalk
- Teleport vs Zencity
- Teleport vs Accela
- Teleport vs CitizenLab
- Teleport vs Bonfire
- Teleport vs CentralSquare
- Teleport vs CityView
- Teleport vs IAPro
- Teleport vs iCompass
- Teleport vs Mapbox Government
- Teleport vs Mark43
- Teleport vs MuckRock
- Teleport vs Municode
- Teleport vs Bang the Table
- Teleport vs Legistar
- Teleport vs JumpCloud
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Vault
- Teleport vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Teleport vs Beyond Identity
- Teleport vs Falco
- Teleport vs Delinea
- Teleport vs Sysdig
- Teleport vs BeyondTrust
- Teleport vs One Identity
- Teleport vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Teleport vs Doppler
- Teleport vs Infisical
- Teleport vs Akeyless
- Teleport vs DataGrail
- Teleport vs Envysion
- Teleport vs Feedzai

