Government · head to head
Bonfire vs Signicat

Bonfire
Government
Public sector sourcing and bid evaluation software with scored, auditable award decisions
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bonfire it is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.; Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- They diverge on capability: Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Signicat covers eID scheme brokering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bonfire and Signicat actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bonfire
- Solicitation posting
- Sealed submission intake
- Scored evaluation workspace
- Audit trail
- Supplier portal
- Requirement matrices
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Document verification
- AML screening
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bonfire
- An agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation recordnot Signicat
- A procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and emailnot Signicat
- A university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement systemnot Signicat
- An agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing listnot Signicat
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot Bonfire
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot Bonfire
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot Bonfire
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot Bonfire
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bonfire
- It is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.
- Since the acquisition path from GTY to GI Partners to Euna Solutions, Bonfire sits in a portfolio alongside products it once competed with, which narrows a shortlist that appears independent.
- Suppliers must register on the portal to bid, and small local vendors reliably complain about the extra account, which can reduce responses on low value solicitations.
- Pricing is quoted rather than published and scales with solicitation volume, so an agency with a few very large procurements pays a model designed around throughput.
- Contract management after award is thin compared with dedicated contract lifecycle products, so agencies often buy a second system for the obligations the award created.
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bonfire
On request- Bonfire$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and annual solicitation volume
- Supplier side registration is free, which is how the vendor network grows
- Implementation and training quoted separately from subscription
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Which should you pick?
Choose Bonfire if
- You need solicitation posting.
- You also want sealed submission intake.
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Questions people ask
- Is Bonfire or Signicat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bonfire starts at On request and Signicat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bonfire or Signicat?
- Bonfire starts at On request and Signicat at On request.
- Does Bonfire or Signicat run on more platforms?
- Bonfire runs on Web. Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Bonfire best used for?
- Bonfire is most often used for an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record, a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email, a university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement system, an agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing list. Of those, an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record and a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email are not what Signicat is typically brought in for.
- What can Bonfire do that Signicat cannot?
- Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Sealed submission intake, Scored evaluation workspace, Audit trail. Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bonfire: Who owns Bonfire?
Euna Solutions. Bonfire was acquired by GTY Technology in 2019, GTY was taken private by GI Partners in 2022, and the portfolio was rebranded Euna Solutions in 2023.
Signicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
Bonfire: Is it full procure to pay?
No. It covers sourcing and evaluation through award. Purchase orders and invoicing remain in the finance system.
Signicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
Bonfire: What is the real value?
A defensible, time stamped evaluation record when an award is protested, which is the expensive failure mode in public procurement.
Signicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Bonfire: Can we see what other agencies pay?
Yes. These contracts are public records. Read several comparable awards before negotiating.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bonfire vs Bidnet Direct
- Bonfire vs Periscope Holdings
- Bonfire vs NEOGOV
- Bonfire vs ArchiveSocial
- Bonfire vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Bonfire vs mySidewalk
- Bonfire vs SAP for Government
- Bonfire vs Clariti
- Bonfire vs GovPilot
- Bonfire vs Zencity
- Bonfire vs Tyler Technologies
- Bonfire vs Polco
- Bonfire vs SafeCity
- Bonfire vs SeeClickFix
- Bonfire vs ShotSpotter
- Bonfire vs Springbrook Software
- Bonfire vs Rock Solid
- Bonfire vs Jumio
- Bonfire vs Sumsub
- Bonfire vs IDnow
- Bonfire vs Trulioo
- Bonfire vs Veriff
- Bonfire vs iDenfy
- Bonfire vs Yoti
- Bonfire vs Shufti Pro
- Bonfire vs Socure
- Bonfire vs March Networks
- Bonfire vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Bonfire vs Semperis
- Bonfire vs MetricStream
- Bonfire vs Microsoft Defender
- Bonfire vs Mimecast
- Bonfire vs Motorola Vigilant
- Bonfire vs Nessus
- Bonfire vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs Bidnet Direct
- Signicat vs Periscope Holdings
- Signicat vs NEOGOV
- Signicat vs ArchiveSocial
- Signicat vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Signicat vs mySidewalk
- Signicat vs SAP for Government
- Signicat vs Clariti
- Signicat vs GovPilot
- Signicat vs Zencity
- Signicat vs Tyler Technologies
- Signicat vs Polco
- Signicat vs SafeCity
- Signicat vs SeeClickFix
- Signicat vs ShotSpotter
- Signicat vs Springbrook Software
- Signicat vs Rock Solid
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel
