Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Osano

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Osano
Cybersecurity
Consent management and data privacy platform with a published self-serve tier
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Osano the published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Osano covers Consent banner.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Osano actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Osano |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Per month by monthly website visitors |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Osano
- Consent banner
- Pre-consent tag blocking
- Consent record
- No fines guarantee
- Subject rights requests
- Data mapping
- Vendor privacy monitoring
- Cookie scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Osano
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Osano
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Osano
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Osano
Osano
- A mid market company selling into the EU and California that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor regionnot Blacksmith
- A privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liabilitynot Blacksmith
- A marketing team that needs Google Consent Mode signals wired correctly so analytics and ads degrade rather than break when consent is refusednot Blacksmith
- A company with a handful of brand domains wanting one consent record and one scanning schedule across all of themnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Osano
- The published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.
- The no fines guarantee is bounded and conditional on configuring the product as instructed, so it is a marketing differentiator with an indemnity cap rather than the insurance policy the name suggests, and the limits should be read before it influences a decision.
- Everything beyond consent, including subject rights automation, data mapping and vendor monitoring, is enterprise quoted, so the transparent pricing that attracts buyers covers only the cheapest part of the platform.
- Tag blocking depends on tags being loaded through the mechanisms Osano can intercept, and marketing teams that inject scripts directly into templates or through server side tagging routinely leak trackers past the banner without anyone noticing.
- It is a privacy platform rather than a security compliance one, so organisations that also need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence collection run it alongside a separate tool and duplicate parts of the vendor and asset inventory.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Osano
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- 1 domain
- 5,000 monthly visitors
- Plus$199/month
- 2 users
- 3 domains
- 30,000 monthly visitors
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited domains and higher visitor volumes
- Subject rights request automation
- Data mapping and assessments
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Osano if
- You need consent banner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want pre-consent tag blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Osano better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Osano at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Osano?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Osano at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Osano run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Osano runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Osano is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Osano cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Osano covers Consent banner, Pre-consent tag blocking, Consent record, No fines guarantee.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceOsano: Does the free tier include the no fines guarantee?
No. The guarantee attaches to paid use of the consent product, and the free tier is capped at one domain and 5,000 monthly visitors.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceOsano: How is Osano priced?
By monthly website visitors, number of domains and tier. The self-serve path stops at a low visitor ceiling and everything above is quoted.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceOsano: Can it handle US state privacy laws as well as GDPR?
Yes, with region aware rule sets covering GDPR, ePrivacy and the US state regimes, so an EU visitor sees an opt-in banner and a US visitor sees the applicable opt-out.
Osano: Does Osano do subject access requests?
Yes, but in the enterprise tier rather than the published plans, and it is quoted separately from consent.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs TrustArc
- Blacksmith vs Transcend
- Blacksmith vs Termly
- Blacksmith vs OneTrust
- Blacksmith vs DataGrail
- Blacksmith vs Avast One
- Blacksmith vs CyberGhost VPN
- Blacksmith vs ProtonVPN
- Blacksmith vs Securiti
- Blacksmith vs Surfshark
- Blacksmith vs BigID
- Blacksmith vs Mullvad VPN
- Blacksmith vs Speakeasy
- Blacksmith vs Sysdig
- Blacksmith vs Tenable
- Blacksmith vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Blacksmith vs TunnelBear
- Blacksmith vs Vanta
- Osano vs WarpBuild
- Osano vs Depot
- Osano vs Namespace
- Osano vs Earthly
- Osano vs Nx Cloud
- Osano vs OpsLevel
- Osano vs Garden
- Osano vs ConfigCat
- Osano vs Dagger
- Osano vs Nix
- Osano vs Rust
- Osano vs Ansible
- Osano vs PartyKit
- Osano vs PhpStorm
- Osano vs Pieces for Developers
- Osano vs RAD Studio
- Osano vs Refact
- Osano vs TrustArc
- Osano vs Transcend
- Osano vs Termly
- Osano vs OneTrust
- Osano vs DataGrail
- Osano vs Avast One
- Osano vs CyberGhost VPN
- Osano vs ProtonVPN
- Osano vs Securiti
- Osano vs Surfshark
- Osano vs BigID
- Osano vs Mullvad VPN
- Osano vs Speakeasy
- Osano vs Sysdig
- Osano vs Tenable
- Osano vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Osano vs TunnelBear
- Osano vs Vanta
