Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Securiti

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Securiti
Cybersecurity
Data and AI security posture management with privacy operations on a single data catalogue
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Blacksmith has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Securiti value depends entirely on connector coverage and completed scanning, so the first useful data map commonly takes months and stalls whenever a data owner will not grant access to a system.
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Securiti covers Sensitive data discovery.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Securiti actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Securiti |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Securiti
- Sensitive data discovery
- Data security posture management
- Data access intelligence
- AI and LLM governance
- PrivacyOps
- Data flow governance
- Breach impact analysis
- People data graph
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Securiti
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Securiti
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Securiti
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Securiti
Securiti
- An enterprise that must answer, within days of a breach, exactly whose regulated data was in the affected store and in which jurisdictionsnot Blacksmith
- A privacy team automating deletion requests across dozens of systems where the hard part is knowing where a person appears at allnot Blacksmith
- A security team that needs to find sensitive data sitting in over-permissive cloud buckets and warehouse tables before an auditor doesnot Blacksmith
- A company putting internal data into retrieval-augmented AI applications and needing to prove that regulated fields are not reaching the modelnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Securiti
- Value depends entirely on connector coverage and completed scanning, so the first useful data map commonly takes months and stalls whenever a data owner will not grant access to a system.
- Usage-based pricing tied to data volume means costs rise as the estate grows rather than as the security programme matures, and organisations with large but low-risk data lakes pay for scanning they do not need.
- The breadth across DSPM, privacy and AI governance means each individual module is competing with a specialist, and buyers who only need one of the three often find a focused tool does that job better for less.
- Classification accuracy on unstructured and free-text data requires tuning, and untuned deployments generate false positives that erode trust in the catalogue precisely when teams are being asked to act on it.
- Pricing is unpublished and modular, so scoping is difficult without a sales engagement and the eventual cost depends on module choices that are hard to evaluate before you have seen your own data map.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Securiti
On request- Data and AI Command Centre$undefined/year
- Modular, usage based pricing quoted by data volume and modules selected
- Available through the AWS marketplace as well as direct
- Annual subscription with no fixed end date, cancellable
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Securiti if
- You need sensitive data discovery.
- You also want data security posture management.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Securiti better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Securiti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Securiti?
- Blacksmith has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Blacksmith and On request for Securiti.
- Does Blacksmith or Securiti run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Securiti runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Yes. Blacksmith has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Securiti starts at On request.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Securiti is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Securiti cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Securiti covers Sensitive data discovery, Data security posture management, Data access intelligence, AI and LLM governance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceSecuriti: Is Securiti a DSPM tool or a privacy tool?
Both, deliberately. It runs data security posture management and privacy operations off one discovery catalogue, which is its main argument against buying two products.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceSecuriti: What does it cost?
Not published. Pricing is modular and usage based, quoted by data volume and selected modules, and it is also available through the AWS marketplace.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceSecuriti: How long until it is useful?
Expect months, not weeks. The limiting factor is configuring connectors and getting access approvals to the systems you most want scanned.
Securiti: Does it govern AI use?
Yes, it includes controls over data flowing into models and retrieval pipelines, which is increasingly the reason enterprises shortlist it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs BigID
- Blacksmith vs OneTrust
- Blacksmith vs Transcend
- Blacksmith vs DataGrail
- Blacksmith vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Blacksmith vs Netwrix
- Blacksmith vs Osano
- Blacksmith vs Mullvad VPN
- Blacksmith vs Speakeasy
- Blacksmith vs Endor Labs
- Blacksmith vs Enpass
- Blacksmith vs Private Internet Access
- Blacksmith vs Microsoft Intune
- Blacksmith vs NordVPN
- Blacksmith vs Omada Identity
- Blacksmith vs Ory
- Blacksmith vs ProtonVPN
- Securiti vs WarpBuild
- Securiti vs Depot
- Securiti vs Namespace
- Securiti vs Earthly
- Securiti vs Nx Cloud
- Securiti vs OpsLevel
- Securiti vs Garden
- Securiti vs ConfigCat
- Securiti vs Dagger
- Securiti vs Nix
- Securiti vs Rust
- Securiti vs Ansible
- Securiti vs PartyKit
- Securiti vs PhpStorm
- Securiti vs Pieces for Developers
- Securiti vs RAD Studio
- Securiti vs Refact
- Securiti vs BigID
- Securiti vs OneTrust
- Securiti vs Transcend
- Securiti vs DataGrail
- Securiti vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Securiti vs Netwrix
- Securiti vs Osano
- Securiti vs Mullvad VPN
- Securiti vs Speakeasy
- Securiti vs Endor Labs
- Securiti vs Enpass
- Securiti vs Private Internet Access
- Securiti vs Microsoft Intune
- Securiti vs NordVPN
- Securiti vs Omada Identity
- Securiti vs Ory
- Securiti vs ProtonVPN
