Cybersecurity · head to head
Beyond Identity vs Endor Labs

Beyond Identity
Cybersecurity
Phishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Endor Labs
Cybersecurity
Security and AI agent governance for code and supply chain
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Endor Labs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Beyond Identity it is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.; Endor Labs pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- They diverge on capability: Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Beyond Identity and Endor Labs actually diverge.
| Attribute | Beyond Identity | Endor Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Seat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, CLI, IDE |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Beyond Identity
- Device-bound credentials
- Continuous device posture
- No shared secrets
- Identity provider integration
- Secure developer signing
- Administrator policy engine
Only in Endor Labs
- AI coding agent governance
- SAST scanning
- Secrets detection
- Reachability analysis
- Open source dependency scanning
- Package firewall
- MCP server integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Beyond Identity
- An organisation that suffered a breach through MFA push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineerednot Endor Labs
- A software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patchesnot Endor Labs
- A firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systemsnot Endor Labs
- A security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on topnot Endor Labs
Endor Labs
- Securing AI coding agent outputs before deploymentnot Beyond Identity
- Reducing SAST false positives with reachability analysisnot Beyond Identity
- Managing open source supply chain risknot Beyond Identity
- Enforcing security policies in CI/CD pipelinesnot Beyond Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Beyond Identity
- It is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.
- Every device that authenticates needs the platform authenticator installed, which makes onboarding contractors, third parties and shared kiosks awkward and sometimes impossible.
- Pricing is quoted per user with no published rates, so buyers cannot benchmark it against the increasingly capable passkey support now included in identity provider base licences.
- Losing all enrolled devices requires an administrative recovery path, and organisations that design that path poorly reintroduce a social-engineering target at the helpdesk.
- Legacy applications that only speak passwords or older protocols need a federation shim or stay outside the policy, so coverage is rarely complete in an estate with old systems.
Endor Labs
- Pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Developer tier lacks UI and historical scan data
- Free tier limited to local scanning only
- Seat-based model may become expensive for large teams
Pricing, plan by plan
Beyond Identity
On request- Secure Access Platform$undefined/year
- Per-user annual subscription quoted by seat count
- Deployed alongside an existing identity provider rather than replacing it
- Device posture integrations with major EDR and MDM vendors included
Endor Labs
Free- DeveloperFree
- Local scanning
- Read-only vulnerability data
- No UI, policies, or scan history
Which should you pick?
Choose Beyond Identity if
- You need device-bound credentials.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want continuous device posture.
Choose Endor Labs if
- You need ai coding agent governance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE.
- You also want sast scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is Beyond Identity or Endor Labs better?
- Neither clearly leads. Beyond Identity starts at On request and Endor Labs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Beyond Identity or Endor Labs?
- Endor Labs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Beyond Identity and Free for Endor Labs.
- Does Beyond Identity or Endor Labs run on more platforms?
- Beyond Identity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android. Endor Labs runs on Web, CLI, IDE.
- Can I use Endor Labs for free?
- Yes. Endor Labs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Beyond Identity starts at On request.
- What is Beyond Identity best used for?
- Beyond Identity is most often used for an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered, a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches, a firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systems, a security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on top. Of those, an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered and a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches are not what Endor Labs is typically brought in for.
- What can Beyond Identity do that Endor Labs cannot?
- Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Continuous device posture, No shared secrets, Identity provider integration. Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, SAST scanning, Secrets detection, Reachability analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Beyond Identity: Does it replace Okta or Entra ID?
No. It sits in front of them as the authentication method. Budget for both.
Endor Labs: What is the difference between Endor Labs Developer and paid tiers?
Developer tier is free and provides local scanning via MCP server with read-only vulnerability access and no UI. Paid tiers (Core and Pro) add team features like policy enforcement, enterprise integrations, reporting, and scan history.
SourceBeyond Identity: What happens when a user loses their laptop?
They authenticate from another enrolled device, or go through an administrative recovery flow. Designing that recovery well matters, because it is the weakest point.
Endor Labs: How does Endor Labs define seats for pricing?
Seats are calculated per contributing developer (those with commits in monitored repositories within the last 90 days). Volume discounts apply as team size grows.
SourceBeyond Identity: Is it different from passkeys?
The credential mechanism is similar in spirit. The difference is enforcing device security posture at every authentication, which standard passkeys do not do.
Endor Labs: Does Endor Labs support on-premises deployment?
The platform is cloud-based SaaS by default. Enterprise customers should contact sales to discuss custom deployment options.
SourceRelated pages
More on Beyond Identity
Other head to heads
- Beyond Identity vs 1Password
- Beyond Identity vs Cisco Duo
- Beyond Identity vs Transmit Security
- Beyond Identity vs Teleport
- Beyond Identity vs Authelia
- Beyond Identity vs authentik
- Beyond Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Beyond Identity vs Clerk
- Beyond Identity vs Frontegg
- Beyond Identity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Beyond Identity vs Logto
- Beyond Identity vs Ory
- Beyond Identity vs WorkOS
- Beyond Identity vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Beyond Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Beyond Identity vs Osano
- Beyond Identity vs Proton Mail
- Beyond Identity vs Veriff
- Beyond Identity vs Snyk
- Beyond Identity vs Socket
- Beyond Identity vs Chainguard
- Beyond Identity vs Akeyless
- Beyond Identity vs Doppler
- Beyond Identity vs Arnica
- Beyond Identity vs Infisical
- Beyond Identity vs Veracode
- Beyond Identity vs Speakeasy
- Beyond Identity vs Tenable
- Beyond Identity vs HashiCorp Vault
- Beyond Identity vs Transcend
- Beyond Identity vs Windscribe
- Beyond Identity vs Yoti
- Beyond Identity vs Avast One
- Beyond Identity vs Cosign
- Endor Labs vs 1Password
- Endor Labs vs Cisco Duo
- Endor Labs vs Transmit Security
- Endor Labs vs Teleport
- Endor Labs vs Authelia
- Endor Labs vs authentik
- Endor Labs vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Endor Labs vs Clerk
- Endor Labs vs Frontegg
- Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Endor Labs vs Logto
- Endor Labs vs Ory
- Endor Labs vs WorkOS
- Endor Labs vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Endor Labs vs Milestone XProtect
- Endor Labs vs Osano
- Endor Labs vs Proton Mail
- Endor Labs vs Veriff
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Socket
- Endor Labs vs Chainguard
- Endor Labs vs Akeyless
- Endor Labs vs Doppler
- Endor Labs vs Arnica
- Endor Labs vs Infisical
- Endor Labs vs Veracode
- Endor Labs vs Speakeasy
- Endor Labs vs Tenable
- Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Vault
- Endor Labs vs Transcend
- Endor Labs vs Windscribe
- Endor Labs vs Yoti
- Endor Labs vs Avast One
- Endor Labs vs Cosign
