Cybersecurity · head to head
Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Boundary

Endor Labs
Cybersecurity
Security and AI agent governance for code and supply chain
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

HashiCorp Boundary
Cybersecurity
Identity-aware session broker for infrastructure access without distributing credentials
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Endor Labs pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates; HashiCorp Boundary hashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- They diverge on capability: Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Endor Labs and HashiCorp Boundary actually diverge.
| Attribute | Endor Labs | HashiCorp Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Seat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, IDE | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Endor Labs
- AI coding agent governance
- SAST scanning
- Secrets detection
- Reachability analysis
- Open source dependency scanning
- Package firewall
- MCP server integration
Only in HashiCorp Boundary
- Identity-based access
- Just-in-time credentials
- Dynamic host catalogues
- Session recording
- Transparent sessions
- Multi-hop workers
- Audit logging
- Terraform provider
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Endor Labs
- Securing AI coding agent outputs before deploymentnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Reducing SAST false positives with reachability analysisnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Managing open source supply chain risknot HashiCorp Boundary
- Enforcing security policies in CI/CD pipelinesnot HashiCorp Boundary
HashiCorp Boundary
- A platform team replacing shared SSH keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity providernot Endor Labs
- Granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keepnot Endor Labs
- An estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of datenot Endor Labs
- Producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they rannot Endor Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Endor Labs
- Pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Developer tier lacks UI and historical scan data
- Free tier limited to local scanning only
- Seat-based model may become expensive for large teams
HashiCorp Boundary
- HashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- Enterprise pricing is not published anywhere, and the features most organisations actually need for compliance, notably session recording, are Enterprise only, so the free community edition is rarely the version you end up buying.
- It solves access to infrastructure, not to applications; browser-based internal tools, SaaS admin consoles and APIs need a separate control, so Boundary is one component of a zero-trust programme rather than the whole thing.
- Running it yourself means operating controllers, worker nodes and a Postgres database in a highly available configuration, and if that control plane is down nobody can reach production, which makes it a new critical dependency.
- It is materially easier to adopt if you already run Vault and Terraform; teams without that ecosystem face a steeper learning curve than a device-based mesh product like Tailscale, for a similar access outcome.
Pricing, plan by plan
Endor Labs
Free- DeveloperFree
- Local scanning
- Read-only vulnerability data
- No UI, policies, or scan history
HashiCorp Boundary
Free- Boundary Community EditionFree
- MPL 2.0 open source
- Self-hosted controllers and workers
- Identity-based target access
- Boundary Enterprise$undefined/year
- Session recording and playback
- Multi-hop and transparent sessions
- Multi-tenancy via scopes
Which should you pick?
Choose Endor Labs if
- You need ai coding agent governance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE.
- You also want sast scanning.
Choose HashiCorp Boundary if
- You need identity-based access.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want just-in-time credentials.
Questions people ask
- Is Endor Labs or HashiCorp Boundary better?
- Neither clearly leads. Endor Labs starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Endor Labs or HashiCorp Boundary?
- Endor Labs starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free.
- Does Endor Labs or HashiCorp Boundary run on more platforms?
- Endor Labs runs on Web, CLI, IDE. HashiCorp Boundary runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Endor Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Endor Labs best used for?
- Endor Labs is most often used for securing ai coding agent outputs before deployment, reducing sast false positives with reachability analysis, managing open source supply chain risk, enforcing security policies in ci/cd pipelines. Of those, securing ai coding agent outputs before deployment and reducing sast false positives with reachability analysis are not what HashiCorp Boundary is typically brought in for.
- What can Endor Labs do that HashiCorp Boundary cannot?
- Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, SAST scanning, Secrets detection, Reachability analysis. HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Just-in-time credentials, Dynamic host catalogues, Session recording.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Endor Labs: What is the difference between Endor Labs Developer and paid tiers?
Developer tier is free and provides local scanning via MCP server with read-only vulnerability access and no UI. Paid tiers (Core and Pro) add team features like policy enforcement, enterprise integrations, reporting, and scan history.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Is Boundary open source?
The community edition is, under MPL 2.0. Boundary Enterprise is commercial and is now sold through IBM Passport Advantage.
Endor Labs: How does Endor Labs define seats for pricing?
Seats are calculated per contributing developer (those with commits in monitored repositories within the last 90 days). Volume discounts apply as team size grows.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Does it replace a VPN?
For infrastructure access, largely yes. It grants a session to a specific target rather than putting the user on a network, but it does not cover browser-based internal applications.
Endor Labs: Does Endor Labs support on-premises deployment?
The platform is cloud-based SaaS by default. Enterprise customers should contact sales to discuss custom deployment options.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: What does Boundary Enterprise cost?
HashiCorp does not publish Boundary pricing. It is quoted, and since the IBM acquisition it is transacted on IBM licensing paper.
HashiCorp Boundary: Do I need Vault to use it?
No, but the just-in-time credential brokering that makes Boundary worthwhile depends on Vault or an equivalent secrets store.
Related pages
More on HashiCorp Boundary
Other head to heads
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Socket
- Endor Labs vs Chainguard
- Endor Labs vs Akeyless
- Endor Labs vs Doppler
- Endor Labs vs Arnica
- Endor Labs vs Infisical
- Endor Labs vs Veracode
- Endor Labs vs Speakeasy
- Endor Labs vs Tenable
- Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Vault
- Endor Labs vs Transcend
- Endor Labs vs Windscribe
- Endor Labs vs Yoti
- Endor Labs vs authentik
- Endor Labs vs Avast One
- Endor Labs vs Cosign
- Endor Labs vs BeyondTrust
- Endor Labs vs Teleport
- Endor Labs vs Delinea
- Endor Labs vs 1Password
- Endor Labs vs LastPass
- Endor Labs vs Logto
- Endor Labs vs Ory
- Endor Labs vs Saviynt
- Endor Labs vs Beyond Identity
- Endor Labs vs One Identity
- Endor Labs vs Keygen
- Endor Labs vs KnowBe4
- Endor Labs vs Legit Security
- Endor Labs vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Endor Labs vs Metasploit
- Endor Labs vs MetricStream
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Snyk
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Socket
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Chainguard
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Akeyless
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Doppler
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Arnica
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Veracode
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Speakeasy
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Tenable
- HashiCorp Boundary vs HashiCorp Vault
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Transcend
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Windscribe
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Yoti
- HashiCorp Boundary vs authentik
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Avast One
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Cosign
- HashiCorp Boundary vs BeyondTrust
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Teleport
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Delinea
- HashiCorp Boundary vs 1Password
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LastPass
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Logto
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ory
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Saviynt
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Beyond Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs One Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Keygen
- HashiCorp Boundary vs KnowBe4
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Legit Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LogRhythm SIEM
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Metasploit
- HashiCorp Boundary vs MetricStream
