Maritime · head to head
Bearing AI vs Terminal49

Bearing AI
Maritime
Machine learning vessel performance models for voyage and commercial decisions, embedded in partner platforms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Terminal49 has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bearing AI bearing increasingly reaches customers embedded in partner platforms such as StormGeo, so the contract, support path and commercial relationship may be with the partner rather than with Bearing.; Terminal49 aPI access and webhooks start at the Essential plan
- They diverge on capability: Bearing AI covers Vessel-specific consumption models, Terminal49 covers Automated tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bearing AI and Terminal49 actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bearing AI | Terminal49 |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, API | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2019 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bearing AI
- Vessel-specific consumption models
- Speed optimisation
- Emissions forecasting
- Voyage evaluation
- AIS-derived data
- Weather-aware routing inputs
- Fleet benchmarking
- Partner platform embedding
Only in Terminal49
- Automated tracking
- Terminal appointments
- Demurrage alerts
- Customer portals
- TMS platforms
- Carrier websites
- Terminal systems
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bearing AI
- A chartering desk evaluating fixtures against learned consumption rather than a delivery-era speed and consumption tablenot Terminal49
- Projecting a vessel CII rating for a planned trading pattern before committing to itnot Terminal49
- Identifying which sister ship in a series is underperforming because of hull condition rather than routingnot Terminal49
- Feeding realistic consumption predictions into an existing voyage optimisation platform through an APInot Terminal49
Terminal49
- Tracking ocean containers and shipments across carriers and terminalsnot Bearing AI
- Feeding container milestones into an internal system over an APInot Bearing AI
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bearing AI
- Bearing increasingly reaches customers embedded in partner platforms such as StormGeo, so the contract, support path and commercial relationship may be with the partner rather than with Bearing.
- Model accuracy depends on the volume and honesty of historical voyage data, and fleets with sparse or inaccurate noon reporting get materially weaker vessel-specific models.
- It is a modelling layer rather than a voyage management system of record, so it must be bought alongside a platform that handles the operational workflow.
- As a venture-funded specialist with a small headcount, its long-term independence is uncertain, and a modelling layer inside someone else product is a fragile position if a partnership lapses.
- Nothing is published on pricing or fleet size thresholds, so small owners cannot tell whether they are a viable customer without entering a sales process.
Terminal49
- API access and webhooks start at the Essential plan
- The free plan is limited to 3 users and 50 document credits
- The Lite and Complete plans require an annual contract
- No plan above the free tier publishes a price, so every paid tier requires contacting sales
Pricing, plan by plan
Bearing AI
On request- Bearing AI$undefined/year
- Priced per vessel per year on annual agreements
- Often purchased indirectly as a component of a partner voyage optimisation service
- Model onboarding requires historical voyage data supplied by the customer
Terminal49
Free- Pro$299/month
- Unlimited tracking
- Terminal data
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Bearing AI if
- You need vessel-specific consumption models.
- You work on Web, Cloud, API.
- You also want speed optimisation.
Choose Terminal49 if
- You need automated tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want terminal appointments.
Questions people ask
- Is Bearing AI or Terminal49 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bearing AI starts at On request and Terminal49 at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bearing AI or Terminal49?
- Terminal49 has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Bearing AI and Free for Terminal49.
- Does Bearing AI or Terminal49 run on more platforms?
- Bearing AI runs on Web, Cloud, API. Terminal49 runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Terminal49 for free?
- Yes. Terminal49 has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Bearing AI starts at On request.
- What is Bearing AI best used for?
- Bearing AI is most often used for a chartering desk evaluating fixtures against learned consumption rather than a delivery-era speed and consumption table, projecting a vessel cii rating for a planned trading pattern before committing to it, identifying which sister ship in a series is underperforming because of hull condition rather than routing, feeding realistic consumption predictions into an existing voyage optimisation platform through an api. Of those, a chartering desk evaluating fixtures against learned consumption rather than a delivery-era speed and consumption table and projecting a vessel cii rating for a planned trading pattern before committing to it are not what Terminal49 is typically brought in for.
- What can Bearing AI do that Terminal49 cannot?
- Bearing AI covers Vessel-specific consumption models, Speed optimisation, Emissions forecasting, Voyage evaluation. Terminal49 covers Automated tracking, Terminal appointments, Demurrage alerts, Customer portals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bearing AI: Can I buy Bearing AI directly?
Yes, but a growing share of its distribution is through partners such as StormGeo, where the models are embedded in that vendor voyage optimisation service.
Terminal49: Is there a free plan available?
Yes, Terminal49 offers a Free Forever plan with no commitment required. It includes up to 3 users, basic shipment tracking, and 50 document credits.
SourceBearing AI: Does it replace a voyage management system?
No. It is a performance modelling layer that feeds commercial and operational decisions made in another system.
Terminal49: What plans require payment?
Terminal49 offers four tiers: Free (free forever), Lite (annual contract), Essential (annual or pay-as-you-go), and Complete (annual contract). Lite, Essential, and Complete require direct contact with sales for pricing.
SourceBearing AI: What data does it need?
Historical voyage data, noon reports and AIS positions, plus weather history. Data quality drives model quality directly.
Terminal49: What features are in the Essential plan?
Essential (Most Popular) includes unlimited users, full shipment & container dashboards, API access & webhooks, intermodal rail tracking, container assignments, and team collaboration features. It offers both annual contract and pay-as-you-go billing options.
SourceBearing AI: Does it cover CII?
Yes, it projects CII ratings from the learned vessel model rather than from nominal consumption figures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bearing AI vs Nautilus Labs
- Bearing AI vs Veson Nautical
- Bearing AI vs NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Bearing AI vs ZeroNorth
- Bearing AI vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- Bearing AI vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- Bearing AI vs Helm Operations
- Bearing AI vs Harbour Assist
- Bearing AI vs SpeedyDock
- Bearing AI vs DNV Maritime
- Bearing AI vs Dockwa
- Bearing AI vs Kaleris
- Bearing AI vs DTN
- Bearing AI vs FleetMon
- Bearing AI vs Linerlytica
- Bearing AI vs MDS Transmodal
- Bearing AI vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Bearing AI vs MarineTraffic
- Bearing AI vs ChartCo
- Bearing AI vs Sea Machines
- Bearing AI vs Portcast
- Bearing AI vs Flexport
- Bearing AI vs Container xChange
- Bearing AI vs Vizion
- Bearing AI vs project44
- Bearing AI vs Freightos
- Bearing AI vs CargoSmart
- Bearing AI vs ORBCOMM
- Bearing AI vs Pole Star Global
- Bearing AI vs Q88
- Bearing AI vs Sea-Intelligence
- Terminal49 vs Nautilus Labs
- Terminal49 vs Veson Nautical
- Terminal49 vs NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Terminal49 vs ZeroNorth
- Terminal49 vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- Terminal49 vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- Terminal49 vs Helm Operations
- Terminal49 vs Harbour Assist
- Terminal49 vs SpeedyDock
- Terminal49 vs DNV Maritime
- Terminal49 vs Dockwa
- Terminal49 vs Kaleris
- Terminal49 vs DTN
- Terminal49 vs FleetMon
- Terminal49 vs Linerlytica
- Terminal49 vs MDS Transmodal
- Terminal49 vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Terminal49 vs MarineTraffic
- Terminal49 vs ChartCo
- Terminal49 vs Sea Machines
- Terminal49 vs Portcast
- Terminal49 vs Flexport
- Terminal49 vs Container xChange
- Terminal49 vs Vizion
- Terminal49 vs project44
- Terminal49 vs Freightos
- Terminal49 vs CargoSmart
- Terminal49 vs ORBCOMM
- Terminal49 vs Pole Star Global
- Terminal49 vs Q88
- Terminal49 vs Sea-Intelligence

