Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Ory Kratos

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ory Kratos has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Ory Kratos headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page
- They diverge on capability: Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Ory Kratos covers Headless API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Ory Kratos actually diverge.
| Attribute | Baffle | Ory Kratos |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open-source self-hosted, with a paid managed network |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Linux, Web | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Ory Kratos
- Headless API
- Self-service flows
- Multi-factor authentication
- Pluggable identity schemas
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Ory Kratos
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Ory Kratos
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Ory Kratos
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Ory Kratos
Ory Kratos
- Products needing complete control over the look and flow of authenticationnot Baffle
- Applications that must not hand user identity data to a third partynot Baffle
- Teams building identity as infrastructure across several servicesnot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Ory Kratos
- Headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page
- More moving parts than a monolithic IAM: Kratos handles identity, and OAuth2 needs Ory Hydra alongside
- Documentation assumes real familiarity with identity concepts and is not a gentle introduction
- Self-hosting identity carries the security and availability burden that hosted providers absorb
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Ory Kratos
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Full identity server
- All flows
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Choose Ory Kratos if
- You need headless api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want self-service flows.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Ory Kratos better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Ory Kratos at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Ory Kratos?
- Ory Kratos has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Baffle and Free for Ory Kratos.
- Does Baffle or Ory Kratos run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Ory Kratos runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Ory Kratos for free?
- Yes. Ory Kratos has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Baffle starts at On request.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Ory Kratos is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Ory Kratos cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification. Ory Kratos covers Headless API, Self-service flows, Multi-factor authentication, Pluggable identity schemas.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Ory Kratos: Is Ory Kratos free?
Yes, open source and free to self-host. Ory Network is a paid managed service.
Baffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Ory Kratos: What does headless mean here?
Kratos provides identity flows as APIs and no user interface. You build the login, registration and recovery screens yourself.
Baffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Ory Kratos: Does Kratos do OAuth2?
No. Kratos handles user identity; OAuth2 and OpenID Connect provider functionality is Ory Hydra, a separate component.
Baffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Logto
- Baffle vs Authelia
- Baffle vs authentik
- Baffle vs Clerk
- Baffle vs Trivy
- Baffle vs Bitwarden
- Baffle vs Frontegg
- Baffle vs Infisical
- Baffle vs Semgrep
- Baffle vs Envysion
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Baffle vs JumpCloud
- Ory Kratos vs Very Good Security
- Ory Kratos vs HashiCorp Vault
- Ory Kratos vs 1Password
- Ory Kratos vs LastPass
- Ory Kratos vs Mullvad VPN
- Ory Kratos vs Private Internet Access
- Ory Kratos vs IVPN
- Ory Kratos vs TunnelBear
- Ory Kratos vs Enpass
- Ory Kratos vs Passbolt
- Ory Kratos vs Feedzai
- Ory Kratos vs Genetec Security Center
- Ory Kratos vs Tenable Nessus
- Ory Kratos vs Transmit Security
- Ory Kratos vs TrustArc
- Ory Kratos vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Ory Kratos vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ory Kratos vs Wireshark
- Ory Kratos vs Logto
- Ory Kratos vs Authelia
- Ory Kratos vs authentik
- Ory Kratos vs Clerk
- Ory Kratos vs Trivy
- Ory Kratos vs Bitwarden
- Ory Kratos vs Frontegg
- Ory Kratos vs Infisical
- Ory Kratos vs Semgrep
- Ory Kratos vs Envysion
- Ory Kratos vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Ory Kratos vs JumpCloud

