Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Semgrep

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Semgrep
Cybersecurity
Open-source static analysis tool for finding security bugs and enforcing code standards.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Semgrep has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Semgrep free tier caps out at 10 contributors and 10 repositories.
- They diverge on capability: Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Semgrep covers Static code scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Semgrep actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Semgrep
- Static code scanning
- Supply chain scanning
- Secrets detection
- Cross-file analysis
- AI-powered triage and remediation
- CI/CD integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Semgrep
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Semgrep
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Semgrep
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Semgrep
Semgrep
- Scanning code for security vulnerabilities in CI/CDnot Baffle
- Detecting vulnerable open-source dependenciesnot Baffle
- Finding hardcoded secrets before code shipsnot Baffle
- Enforcing custom code standards with rule setsnot Baffle
- Prioritizing findings with AI-assisted triagenot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Semgrep
- Free tier caps out at 10 contributors and 10 repositories.
- Secrets scanning is priced as a separate module ($15/contributor) from Code and Supply Chain.
- Self-managed repositories and custom CI/CD require the Enterprise tier.
- AI credits are limited per tier and additional usage requires upgrading.
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Semgrep
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 10 contributors
- Code and Supply Chain scanning
- 60 AI credits total
- Teams$30/month
- Code, Supply Chain, or Secrets scanning per contributor
- Pro rules
- AI-powered triage and remediation
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- On-prem support
- Custom CI/CD
- 50 AI credits per developer/month
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Choose Semgrep if
- You need static code scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, mac, windows.
- You also want supply chain scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Semgrep better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Semgrep at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Semgrep?
- Semgrep has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Baffle and Free for Semgrep.
- Does Baffle or Semgrep run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Semgrep runs on web, api, linux, mac, windows.
- Can I use Semgrep for free?
- Yes. Semgrep has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Baffle starts at On request.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Semgrep is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Semgrep cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification. Semgrep covers Static code scanning, Supply chain scanning, Secrets detection, Cross-file analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Semgrep: What does Semgrep cost?
The Free edition covers up to 10 contributors; Teams starts at $30/contributor/month for Code scanning (Supply Chain also $30, Secrets $15); Enterprise is custom-priced.
SourceBaffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Semgrep: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes, the Free edition supports up to 10 contributors and 10 repositories with Code and Supply Chain scanning plus 60 AI credits total.
SourceBaffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Semgrep: How is usage metered?
Pricing is per contributor, defined as someone who made at least one commit to a scanned private repository in the past 90 days.
SourceBaffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Semgrep: Is there special pricing for startups?
Yes, Semgrep offers special startup pricing upon request for early-stage companies.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Veracode
- Baffle vs Arnica
- Baffle vs Trivy
- Baffle vs Grype
- Baffle vs Snyk
- Baffle vs Bitwarden
- Baffle vs Infisical
- Baffle vs Chainguard
- Baffle vs Authelia
- Baffle vs Ory Kratos
- Baffle vs authentik
- Baffle vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Baffle vs Shufti Pro
- Baffle vs Signicat
- Baffle vs Silent Eight
- Baffle vs Socket
- Baffle vs Socure
- Semgrep vs Very Good Security
- Semgrep vs HashiCorp Vault
- Semgrep vs 1Password
- Semgrep vs LastPass
- Semgrep vs Mullvad VPN
- Semgrep vs Private Internet Access
- Semgrep vs IVPN
- Semgrep vs TunnelBear
- Semgrep vs Enpass
- Semgrep vs Passbolt
- Semgrep vs Feedzai
- Semgrep vs Genetec Security Center
- Semgrep vs Tenable Nessus
- Semgrep vs Transmit Security
- Semgrep vs TrustArc
- Semgrep vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Semgrep vs VMware Carbon Black
- Semgrep vs Wireshark
- Semgrep vs Veracode
- Semgrep vs Arnica
- Semgrep vs Trivy
- Semgrep vs Grype
- Semgrep vs Snyk
- Semgrep vs Bitwarden
- Semgrep vs Infisical
- Semgrep vs Chainguard
- Semgrep vs Authelia
- Semgrep vs Ory Kratos
- Semgrep vs authentik
- Semgrep vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Semgrep vs Shufti Pro
- Semgrep vs Signicat
- Semgrep vs Silent Eight
- Semgrep vs Socket
- Semgrep vs Socure
