Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Frontegg

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Frontegg
Cybersecurity
Customer identity and access management platform for SaaS applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Frontegg has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Frontegg detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.
- They diverge on capability: Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Frontegg covers Hosted login.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Frontegg actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Frontegg
- Hosted login
- Enterprise SSO/SCIM
- Multi-tenant organizations
- Custom domains
- M2M tokens
- Fraud protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Frontegg
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Frontegg
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Frontegg
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Frontegg
Frontegg
- Adding enterprise SSO/SCIM to a B2B SaaS productnot Baffle
- Multi-tenant customer identity managementnot Baffle
- White-labeled, custom-domain login experiencesnot Baffle
- Securing AI agent access to a SaaS product via Agen.conot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Frontegg
- Detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.
- Advanced fraud protection and multiple environments are Enterprise-only, unavailable on the Pay As You Go plan.
- The 7,500 free monthly active users is comparatively modest next to some competitors' free tiers.
- As a broader CIAM platform, it can be more complex to integrate than lighter-weight developer-first auth tools for smaller apps.
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Frontegg
Free- Pay As You GoFree
- 7,500 monthly active users included
- 5 enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM)
- Unlimited organizations
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom pricing
- Multiple environments
- Advanced fraud protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Choose Frontegg if
- You need hosted login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want enterprise sso/scim.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Frontegg better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Frontegg at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Frontegg?
- Frontegg has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Baffle and Free for Frontegg.
- Does Baffle or Frontegg run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Frontegg runs on web, api.
- Can I use Frontegg for free?
- Yes. Frontegg has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Baffle starts at On request.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Frontegg is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Frontegg cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification. Frontegg covers Hosted login, Enterprise SSO/SCIM, Multi-tenant organizations, Custom domains.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Frontegg: What does Frontegg cost?
Frontegg's Pay As You Go plan is free up to 7,500 monthly active users, after which pricing scales with users, enterprise connections and M2M tokens via an online calculator; Enterprise pricing is custom.
SourceBaffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Frontegg: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the free Pay As You Go plan includes 7,500 monthly active users, 5 enterprise SSO/SCIM connections, unlimited organizations, and a custom domain.
SourceBaffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Frontegg: How is usage metered?
Pricing is consumption-based, driven by monthly active users, monthly enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM), and monthly M2M tokens, with customers paying only for usage beyond the free 7,500-user threshold.
SourceBaffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Clerk
- Baffle vs Authelia
- Baffle vs Akeyless
- Baffle vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Baffle vs authentik
- Baffle vs Logto
- Baffle vs Ory Kratos
- Baffle vs Ping Identity
- Baffle vs Speakeasy
- Baffle vs Doppler
- Baffle vs Infisical
- Baffle vs Diligent
- Baffle vs Endor Labs
- Baffle vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Baffle vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Frontegg vs Very Good Security
- Frontegg vs HashiCorp Vault
- Frontegg vs 1Password
- Frontegg vs LastPass
- Frontegg vs Mullvad VPN
- Frontegg vs Private Internet Access
- Frontegg vs IVPN
- Frontegg vs TunnelBear
- Frontegg vs Enpass
- Frontegg vs Passbolt
- Frontegg vs Feedzai
- Frontegg vs Genetec Security Center
- Frontegg vs Tenable Nessus
- Frontegg vs Transmit Security
- Frontegg vs TrustArc
- Frontegg vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Frontegg vs VMware Carbon Black
- Frontegg vs Wireshark
- Frontegg vs Clerk
- Frontegg vs Authelia
- Frontegg vs Akeyless
- Frontegg vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Frontegg vs authentik
- Frontegg vs Logto
- Frontegg vs Ory Kratos
- Frontegg vs Ping Identity
- Frontegg vs Speakeasy
- Frontegg vs Doppler
- Frontegg vs Infisical
- Frontegg vs Diligent
- Frontegg vs Endor Labs
- Frontegg vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Frontegg vs Fortinet FortiGate
