Softwr

Software · head to head

Bacula vs Borg Backup

B

Bacula

Software

The best open source backup software for Linux

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Borg Backup logo

Borg Backup

Software

Deduplicating archiver with compression and encryption

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Bacula the community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.; Borg Backup linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bacula and Borg Backup actually diverge.

Attributes where Bacula and Borg Backup differ
AttributeBaculaBorg Backup
Pricing modelopen-sourcefree
PlatformsWebLinux, Mac
FoundedUnknown2015

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bacula

Nothing recorded that Borg Backup does not also cover.

Only in Borg Backup

  • Content-defined chunking
  • Deduplication
  • Compression
  • Authenticated encryption
  • Pruning
  • Mount archives
  • SSH
  • BorgBase

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bacula

No use cases recorded yet. See the Bacula review.

Borg Backup

  • Deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensivenot Bacula
  • Encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintextnot Bacula
  • Browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over FUSEnot Bacula
  • Scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to runnot Bacula

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bacula

  • The community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.

Borg Backup

  • Linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform
  • Command-line only, with no graphical interface in the project itself
  • Version 2.0 is still in beta, so production use means staying on the 1.4 line
  • Restoring requires the Borg tooling, since archives are a deduplicated chunk store rather than plain files

Pricing, plan by plan

Bacula

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Bacula review.

Borg Backup

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Deduplication
    • Compression
    • Encryption

Which should you pick?

Choose Bacula if

  • You want to start without paying.
Bacula review

Choose Borg Backup if

  • You need content-defined chunking.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Mac.
  • You also want deduplication.
Borg Backup review

Questions people ask

Is Bacula or Borg Backup better?
Neither clearly leads. Bacula starts at Free and Borg Backup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bacula or Borg Backup?
Bacula starts at Free and Borg Backup at Free.
Does Bacula or Borg Backup run on more platforms?
Bacula runs on Web. Borg Backup runs on Linux, Mac.
Can I use Bacula for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What can Bacula do that Borg Backup cannot?
Borg Backup covers Content-defined chunking, Deduplication, Compression, Authenticated encryption.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Bacula

More on Borg Backup

Keep looking

Other head to heads