Logging · head to head
Azure Monitor vs Redis
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; Redis licensing changed from BSD to AGPL in 2025, impacting open-source usage
- They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Redis covers In-memory data store.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and Redis actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Monitor | Redis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Logging | Technology |
| Founded | 2010 | 2009 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Redis
- In-memory data store
- Data structures
- Pub/Sub messaging
- Lua scripting
- Transactions
- Persistence options
- Replication
- Clustering
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Redis
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Redis
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Redis
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Redis
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Redis
Redis
- Cachingnot Azure Monitor
- Session managementnot Azure Monitor
- Real-time analyticsnot Azure Monitor
- Message queuingnot Azure Monitor
- Leaderboardsnot Azure Monitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Redis
- Licensing changed from BSD to AGPL in 2025, impacting open-source usage
- All data must fit in memory, limiting scalability to available RAM
- No built-in support for multi-tenancy
- Limited transaction support compared to traditional databases
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Redis
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Redis review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Choose Redis if
- You need in-memory data store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want data structures.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Monitor or Redis better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and Redis at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or Redis?
- Azure Monitor starts at Free and Redis at Free.
- Does Azure Monitor or Redis run on more platforms?
- Azure Monitor runs on Web, Api. Redis runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Monitor best used for?
- Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what Redis is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Monitor do that Redis cannot?
- Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. Redis covers In-memory data store, Data structures, Pub/Sub messaging, Lua scripting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Monitor: How does Azure Monitor billing work?
Billing is based on data volume ingested into Azure Monitor. Additional charges apply separately for alerts, notifications, web tests, and data export. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription.
SourceRedis: Is Redis open source?
Redis was open source under the BSD license since its inception in 2009 and has remained open source. However, in 2024-2025, Redis Labs changed licensing to source-available and AGPL, prompting the creation of Valkey, a BSD-licensed open-source fork.
SourceAzure Monitor: What savings are available with Azure Monitor?
Capacity reservations offer up to 36% savings compared to standard pay-as-you-go pricing when you commit to reserved capacity upfront.
SourceRedis: What is Redis used for?
Redis is an in-memory data structure store used primarily as a cache, database, and message broker. It provides high-speed data access for real-time applications, sessions, leaderboards, real-time analytics, and other use cases requiring fast data retrieval.
SourceAzure Monitor: Is there a free tier for Azure Monitor?
No dedicated free tier exists. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription, but detailed monitoring requires additional configuration and associated costs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Monitor
Other head to heads
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Grafana Loki
- Azure Monitor vs incident.io
- Azure Monitor vs Cronitor
- Azure Monitor vs FireHydrant
- Azure Monitor vs Healthchecks
- Azure Monitor vs Openstatus
- Azure Monitor vs Rootly
- Azure Monitor vs Checkly
- Azure Monitor vs CloudWatch
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs InfluxDB
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Axiom
- Azure Monitor vs Asana
- Azure Monitor vs ClickUp
- Azure Monitor vs Linear
- Azure Monitor vs Figma
- Azure Monitor vs Kubernetes
- Azure Monitor vs Notion
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog
- Azure Monitor vs Monday.com
- Azure Monitor vs Terraform
- Azure Monitor vs Docker
- Azure Monitor vs Greenhouse
- Azure Monitor vs Google Chrome
- Azure Monitor vs Intercom
- Azure Monitor vs Mozilla Firefox
- Azure Monitor vs Okta
- Azure Monitor vs PostHog
- Azure Monitor vs Supabase
- Azure Monitor vs Amplitude
- Redis vs Elastic Stack
- Redis vs New Relic
- Redis vs Datadog Logs
- Redis vs Coralogix
- Redis vs Grafana Loki
- Redis vs incident.io
- Redis vs Cronitor
- Redis vs FireHydrant
- Redis vs Healthchecks
- Redis vs Openstatus
- Redis vs Rootly
- Redis vs Checkly
- Redis vs CloudWatch
- Redis vs Dynatrace
- Redis vs InfluxDB
- Redis vs Airbrake
- Redis vs AppDynamics
- Redis vs Axiom
- Redis vs Asana
- Redis vs ClickUp
- Redis vs Linear
- Redis vs Figma
- Redis vs Kubernetes
- Redis vs Notion
- Redis vs Datadog
- Redis vs Monday.com
- Redis vs Terraform
- Redis vs Docker
- Redis vs Greenhouse
- Redis vs Google Chrome
- Redis vs Intercom
- Redis vs Mozilla Firefox
- Redis vs Okta
- Redis vs PostHog
- Redis vs Supabase
- Redis vs Amplitude


