Veterinary · head to head
AVImark vs VIA Veterinary

AVImark
Veterinary
Long-running Windows practice management software for veterinary clinics, now part of Covetrus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

VIA Veterinary
Veterinary
Medically oriented veterinary practice management, now owned by Antech and Mars Veterinary Health
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AVImark the owner markets a different cloud platform as its strategic product, so AVImark development is maintenance paced and buyers should expect a migration conversation rather than a long roadmap.; VIA Veterinary the vendor is owned by Mars Veterinary Health through Antech, the same group that owns Antech Diagnostics, Banfield and VCA, so a practice is buying its record system from its diagnostics supplier and its competitor in the consolidation market.
- They diverge on capability: AVImark covers Medical records, VIA Veterinary covers Clinical flowsheets.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AVImark and VIA Veterinary actually diverge.
| Attribute | AVImark | VIA Veterinary |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, Web, iPadOS |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Veterinary).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AVImark
- Medical records
- Appointment scheduling
- Invoicing and estimates
- Inventory and controlled drugs
- Reminders
- Add-on modules
Only in VIA Veterinary
- Clinical flowsheets
- Integrated SOAP
- DICOM imaging
- Laboratory results
- VIA Cloud
- VIA Touch
- Multi-site
- Open standards integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AVImark
- A single site clinic that wants the lowest ongoing software cost and already has a server and an IT providernot VIA Veterinary
- A practice whose staff are fast in AVImark and where retraining cost outweighs the benefits of movingnot VIA Veterinary
- A rural clinic with poor connectivity that cannot depend on a browser based systemnot VIA Veterinary
- A practice buying Covetrus pharmacy and supplies that wants prescription workflow in the same systemnot VIA Veterinary
VIA Veterinary
- An emergency and critical care hospital that runs on treatment flowsheets and a live whiteboard rather than an appointment calendarnot AVImark
- A multi-doctor specialty referral practice needing DICOM imaging and lab results inside the medical recordnot AVImark
- A practice already committed to Antech diagnostics that wants first-party laboratory and imaging integrationnot AVImark
- A multi-site hospital group consolidating separate practice management installations onto one systemnot AVImark
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AVImark
- The owner markets a different cloud platform as its strategic product, so AVImark development is maintenance paced and buyers should expect a migration conversation rather than a long roadmap.
- Meaningful capabilities including imaging, client communication and wellness plans are separately priced modules, so the quoted base licence understates what a working configuration costs.
- It is Windows and server based, which pushes hardware, backup and IT support costs onto the practice and rules out browser or tablet use in the examination room.
- The interface is keyboard driven and dated, which suits long-serving staff but slows new hires and makes onboarding relief staff harder.
- Data lives in a local database with limited export tooling, so extracting a clean history when moving to another system is a paid conversion project rather than a download.
VIA Veterinary
- The vendor is owned by Mars Veterinary Health through Antech, the same group that owns Antech Diagnostics, Banfield and VCA, so a practice is buying its record system from its diagnostics supplier and its competitor in the consolidation market.
- No pricing is published at all, so licence, implementation, conversion, hardware and support costs all arrive through a sales process and cannot be compared against alternatives before you engage.
- It remains substantially a Windows on-premises product with a cloud option layered on, so hardware, network and backup remain your operational problem in the traditional deployment.
- Integration depth with IDEXX diagnostics is the obvious risk given the ownership, and a practice with in-house IDEXX analysers should test that path explicitly rather than assume parity with Antech.
- The clinical emphasis means front-of-house and client engagement features, including online booking and marketing automation, tend to arrive through third-party integrations rather than natively.
Pricing, plan by plan
AVImark
On request- AVImark$undefined/year
- Licence plus annual maintenance and support agreement
- Add-on modules priced individually
- Server, backup and workstation costs borne by the practice
VIA Veterinary
On request- VIA Veterinary$undefined/year
- Pricing available only through a sales process
- On-premises or VIA Cloud deployment
- Implementation, data conversion and training quoted per hospital
Which should you pick?
Choose AVImark if
- You need medical records.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want appointment scheduling.
Choose VIA Veterinary if
- You need clinical flowsheets.
- You work on Windows, Web, iPadOS.
- You also want integrated soap.
Questions people ask
- Is AVImark or VIA Veterinary better?
- Neither clearly leads. AVImark starts at On request and VIA Veterinary at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AVImark or VIA Veterinary?
- AVImark starts at On request and VIA Veterinary at On request.
- Does AVImark or VIA Veterinary run on more platforms?
- AVImark runs on Windows. VIA Veterinary runs on Windows, Web, iPadOS.
- What is AVImark best used for?
- AVImark is most often used for a single site clinic that wants the lowest ongoing software cost and already has a server and an it provider, a practice whose staff are fast in avimark and where retraining cost outweighs the benefits of moving, a rural clinic with poor connectivity that cannot depend on a browser based system, a practice buying covetrus pharmacy and supplies that wants prescription workflow in the same system. Of those, a single site clinic that wants the lowest ongoing software cost and already has a server and an it provider and a practice whose staff are fast in avimark and where retraining cost outweighs the benefits of moving are not what VIA Veterinary is typically brought in for.
- What can AVImark do that VIA Veterinary cannot?
- AVImark covers Medical records, Appointment scheduling, Invoicing and estimates, Inventory and controlled drugs. VIA Veterinary covers Clinical flowsheets, Integrated SOAP, DICOM imaging, Laboratory results.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AVImark: Who owns AVImark now?
Covetrus, following its spin-out from Henry Schein in 2019 and its move to private ownership in 2022. It was originally a McAllister Software Systems product.
VIA Veterinary: Who owns VIA?
VIA Information Systems is an Antech company and part of Mars Veterinary Health, the group that also owns Antech Diagnostics, Banfield and VCA.
AVImark: Is AVImark being discontinued?
No announcement of that, but Covetrus positions Pulse as its cloud platform. Ask for written roadmap commitments before signing a multi-year agreement.
VIA Veterinary: Is pricing published?
No. Licence, implementation, conversion and support costs come only through a sales process.
AVImark: Can AVImark be run in the cloud?
Only by hosting it on a remote Windows server. It is not a browser application.
VIA Veterinary: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, VIA Cloud is offered alongside traditional on-premises installation, with cloud backup included.
AVImark: Is it cheaper than cloud practice management systems?
On licence cost yes, but add server, backup, IT support and paid modules before making the comparison.
VIA Veterinary: What kind of practice is it built for?
Medically intensive practices: emergency, specialty, referral, equine and multi-doctor small animal hospitals where flowsheets and whiteboards drive the day.
Related pages
More on VIA Veterinary
Other head to heads
- AVImark vs Digitail
- AVImark vs ezyVet
- AVImark vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- AVImark vs PetDesk
- AVImark vs Onward Vet
- AVImark vs Provet Cloud
- AVImark vs Shepherd
- AVImark vs Vetspire
- AVImark vs Hippo Manager
- AVImark vs Instinct Science
- AVImark vs VetBadger
- AVImark vs Talkatoo
- AVImark vs Vet Radar
- AVImark vs RxWorks
- AVImark vs Animana
- AVImark vs IDEXX Neo
- AVImark vs VisionVPM
- AVImark vs ImproMed
- AVImark vs Covetrus Pulse
- VIA Veterinary vs Digitail
- VIA Veterinary vs ezyVet
- VIA Veterinary vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- VIA Veterinary vs PetDesk
- VIA Veterinary vs Onward Vet
- VIA Veterinary vs Provet Cloud
- VIA Veterinary vs Shepherd
- VIA Veterinary vs Vetspire
- VIA Veterinary vs Hippo Manager
- VIA Veterinary vs Instinct Science
- VIA Veterinary vs VetBadger
- VIA Veterinary vs Talkatoo
- VIA Veterinary vs Vet Radar
- VIA Veterinary vs RxWorks
- VIA Veterinary vs Animana
- VIA Veterinary vs IDEXX Neo
- VIA Veterinary vs VisionVPM
- VIA Veterinary vs ImproMed
- VIA Veterinary vs Covetrus Pulse
