Networking · head to head
Auvik vs Ivanti

Auvik
Networking
Cloud-based network monitoring and management priced by managed device count, quote-only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ivanti
Networking
Security, service management, and unified endpoint management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Auvik no pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison; Ivanti no pricing information published - enterprise custom pricing required
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auvik and Ivanti actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auvik
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- Multi-tenant MSP view
- Traffic insight
- Device-based billing with exclusions
Only in Ivanti
Nothing recorded that Auvik does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auvik
- An MSP wanting a single SaaS platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregationnot Ivanti
- An internal IT team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselvesnot Ivanti
- A network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manuallynot Ivanti
- An organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collectornot Ivanti
Ivanti
- Controlling device compliance and patches for remote workforcesnot Auvik
- Automating service ticketing and change processes at enterprise scalenot Auvik
- Enforcing device compliance before network access in regulated industriesnot Auvik
- Prioritizing vulnerability patches by risk levelnot Auvik
- Enabling passwordless zero-trust access without VPN infrastructurenot Auvik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auvik
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison
- Billing by managed device count means the total cost is not knowable in advance without first running an accurate device count against Auvik's specific inclusion and exclusion rules
- As a SaaS-only product with no on-premises option, an organisation loses monitoring visibility if its own internet connection to Auvik's cloud goes down at the same time as the incident it needs to diagnose
- MSP-focused multi-tenant packaging may include features an internal IT team monitoring only its own network does not need, while still pricing against that broader feature set
- Configuration backup and restore depend on Auvik correctly supporting the specific hardware models on a given network; less common vendors may have thinner support
- Volume discounts exist but are also not published, so an MSP scaling client count has no way to model margin impact before negotiating each contract renewal
Ivanti
- no pricing information published - enterprise custom pricing required
Pricing, plan by plan
Auvik
On request- Auvik$undefined/month
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- MSP multi-tenant packages available
Ivanti
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Ivanti review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Ivanti if
Nothing in the data separates Ivanti from Auvik on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Auvik or Ivanti better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auvik starts at On request and Ivanti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auvik or Ivanti?
- Auvik starts at On request and Ivanti at On request.
- Does Auvik or Ivanti run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Auvik best used for?
- Auvik is most often used for an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation, an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves, a network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manually, an organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collector. Of those, an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation and an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves are not what Ivanti is typically brought in for.
- What can Auvik do that Ivanti cannot?
- Auvik covers Automated network mapping, Configuration backup, Multi-tenant MSP view, Traffic insight.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auvik: Is Auvik priced per network or per device?
Per device, according to Auvik's own FAQ; some device categories like access points and printers are monitored at no additional charge.
Ivanti: How much does Ivanti cost?
Ivanti does not publish pricing on their website. As an enterprise solution, pricing is customized based on organizational needs. Contact Ivanti through their website to request a demo and pricing information.
SourceAuvik: Is there any published price?
No, all pricing is quote-only through a sales conversation.
Auvik: Does Auvik require an on-premises server?
No, it is SaaS-delivered with a lightweight local collector rather than a full on-premises monitoring server.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Auvik vs Domotz
- Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Auvik vs LibreNMS
- Auvik vs Kentik
- Auvik vs Zabbix
- Auvik vs ThousandEyes
- Auvik vs Icinga
- Auvik vs OpenVPN
- Auvik vs Consul
- Auvik vs Tailscale
- Auvik vs Cisco Meraki
- Auvik vs HiveMQ
- Auvik vs Traefik
- Auvik vs ZeroTier
- Auvik vs Juniper Mist
- Auvik vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Auvik vs Nebula
- Auvik vs ngrok
- Auvik vs Cloudflare
- Auvik vs Grafana
- Auvik vs Prometheus
- Auvik vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Auvik vs Catchpoint
- Auvik vs Palo Alto Networks
- Auvik vs Splunk
- Auvik vs Twingate
- Ivanti vs Domotz
- Ivanti vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Ivanti vs LibreNMS
- Ivanti vs Kentik
- Ivanti vs Zabbix
- Ivanti vs ThousandEyes
- Ivanti vs Icinga
- Ivanti vs OpenVPN
- Ivanti vs Consul
- Ivanti vs Tailscale
- Ivanti vs Cisco Meraki
- Ivanti vs HiveMQ
- Ivanti vs Traefik
- Ivanti vs ZeroTier
- Ivanti vs Juniper Mist
- Ivanti vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Ivanti vs Nebula
- Ivanti vs ngrok
- Ivanti vs Cloudflare
- Ivanti vs Grafana
- Ivanti vs Prometheus
- Ivanti vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Ivanti vs Catchpoint
- Ivanti vs Palo Alto Networks
- Ivanti vs Splunk
- Ivanti vs Twingate
