Networking · head to head
Auvik vs OpenVPN

Auvik
Networking
Cloud-based network monitoring and management priced by managed device count, quote-only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenVPN has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Auvik no pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison; OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- They diverge on capability: Auvik covers Automated network mapping, OpenVPN covers Open source core.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auvik and OpenVPN actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auvik
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- Multi-tenant MSP view
- Traffic insight
- Device-based billing with exclusions
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auvik
- An MSP wanting a single SaaS platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregationnot OpenVPN
- An internal IT team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselvesnot OpenVPN
- A network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manuallynot OpenVPN
- An organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collectornot OpenVPN
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot Auvik
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot Auvik
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot Auvik
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot Auvik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auvik
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison
- Billing by managed device count means the total cost is not knowable in advance without first running an accurate device count against Auvik's specific inclusion and exclusion rules
- As a SaaS-only product with no on-premises option, an organisation loses monitoring visibility if its own internet connection to Auvik's cloud goes down at the same time as the incident it needs to diagnose
- MSP-focused multi-tenant packaging may include features an internal IT team monitoring only its own network does not need, while still pricing against that broader feature set
- Configuration backup and restore depend on Auvik correctly supporting the specific hardware models on a given network; less common vendors may have thinner support
- Volume discounts exist but are also not published, so an MSP scaling client count has no way to model margin impact before negotiating each contract renewal
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Auvik
On request- Auvik$undefined/month
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- MSP multi-tenant packages available
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Auvik or OpenVPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auvik starts at On request and OpenVPN at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auvik or OpenVPN?
- OpenVPN has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Auvik and Free for OpenVPN.
- Does Auvik or OpenVPN run on more platforms?
- Auvik runs on Web. OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- Can I use OpenVPN for free?
- Yes. OpenVPN has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Auvik starts at On request.
- What is Auvik best used for?
- Auvik is most often used for an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation, an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves, a network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manually, an organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collector. Of those, an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation and an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves are not what OpenVPN is typically brought in for.
- What can Auvik do that OpenVPN cannot?
- Auvik covers Automated network mapping, Configuration backup, Multi-tenant MSP view, Traffic insight. OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auvik: Is Auvik priced per network or per device?
Per device, according to Auvik's own FAQ; some device categories like access points and printers are monitored at no additional charge.
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
Auvik: Is there any published price?
No, all pricing is quote-only through a sales conversation.
OpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
Auvik: Does Auvik require an on-premises server?
No, it is SaaS-delivered with a lightweight local collector rather than a full on-premises monitoring server.
OpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Auvik vs Domotz
- Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Auvik vs LibreNMS
- Auvik vs Kentik
- Auvik vs Zabbix
- Auvik vs ThousandEyes
- Auvik vs Icinga
- Auvik vs Consul
- Auvik vs Tailscale
- Auvik vs Cisco Meraki
- Auvik vs HiveMQ
- Auvik vs Traefik
- Auvik vs ZeroTier
- Auvik vs Juniper Mist
- Auvik vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Auvik vs Nebula
- Auvik vs ngrok
- Auvik vs pfSense
- Auvik vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Auvik vs Twingate
- Auvik vs OPNsense
- Auvik vs Palo Alto Networks
- Auvik vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs PRTG Network Monitor
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Kentik
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs ThousandEyes
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Cisco Meraki
- OpenVPN vs HiveMQ
- OpenVPN vs Traefik
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs Juniper Mist
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
